journal article·2022-11-02

Damage Imaging of Lamb Wave in Isotropic Plate Using Phased Array Delay and Sum Based on Frequency-domain Inverse Scattering Model

Fengzhong Li, Ying Luo

Publisher page

Abstract

Among many damage imaging methods based on Lamb wave, phased array Delay and Sum (DAS) has attracted much attention because of its high efficiency. However, inherent dispersion effect leads to the inaccurate acquisition of time-domain features, which affects imaging accuracy. The imaging index based on the amplitude of scattering wave ignores the interaction between Lamb wave and damage, which is difficult to reflect the physical characteristics of damage scattering, and further affects imaging accuracy. We use the physical characteristic parameter-reflectivity of the damage surface as the imaging index and establish an inverse scattering model of damage in frequency domain with dispersion relationship. The simulation and experiment results show that the DAS method combined with the frequency-domain inverse scattering model can realise the high-quality imaging of the damage in the isotropic waveguide structure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Seismic Waves and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Center for International Research on Structural Health Management of Critical Components, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.02010.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.020 ↗
2. 10.2514/6.1997-122510.2514/6.1997-1225 ↗
3. 10.1177/1045389012214527610.1177/10453890122145276 ↗
4. 10.1177/147592170505523310.1177/1475921705055233 ↗
5. 10.1063/2.110510410.1063/2.1105104 ↗
6. 10.12989/sss.2007.3.4.43910.12989/sss.2007.3.4.439 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ultras.2018.08.00510.1016/j.ultras.2018.08.005 ↗
8. 10.1109/58.15617410.1109/58.156174 ↗
9. Cao S · Vibroeng Procedia · 2019 · 23 · 165
10. Zeng L · 2016 · 3
11. Mori N · Ultrasonics · 2018 · 91 · 19
12. 10.1002/stc.191910.1002/stc.1919 ↗
13. Liu Z · J Experimental Mech · 2015 · 30 · 4
14. 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.10.04410.1016/j.jsv.2006.10.044 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2007)20:3(141)10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2007)20:3(141) ↗
16. 10.1121/1.173948210.1121/1.1739482 ↗
17. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/7/07502810.1088/0964-1726/22/7/075028 ↗
18. Sun Y · Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica · 2013 · 30 · 264
19. 10.1080/09349847.2015.112212910.1080/09349847.2015.1122129 ↗
20. 10.1166/jnn.2019.1681410.1166/jnn.2019.16814 ↗
21. 10.2140/jomms.2007.2.45910.2140/jomms.2007.2.459 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.02.00110.1016/j.ultras.2016.02.001 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.218461310.1063/1.2184613 ↗
24. 10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/31210.1088/0964-1726/10/3/312 ↗
25. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100148-6.00010-X10.1016/B978-0-08-100148-6.00010-X ↗
26. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/00510.1088/0964-1726/15/5/005 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.008 ↗
28. Xu C · Meas SciTechnol · 2019 · 30 · 306
29. 10.1364/AO.39.00021210.1364/AO.39.000212 ↗
30. 10.1016/0165-2125(79)90020-910.1016/0165-2125(79)90020-9 ↗
31. 10.1016/0926-9851(93)90045-Z10.1016/0926-9851(93)90045-Z ↗
32. 10.1017/CBO978110727361010.1017/CBO9781107273610 ↗
33. Lester W · Springer · 2016 · 122 · 85
34. Bleistein N · 1984
35. 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2007.02.00810.1016/j.wavemoti.2007.02.008 ↗
36. 10.1177/147592171562335910.1177/1475921715623359 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10338-021-00216-010.1007/s10338-021-00216-0 ↗
38. Giurgiutiu V · 2007
39. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2009.11.01210.1016/j.optlastec.2009.11.012 ↗
40. Lester W · 2015
41. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.002 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.08610.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.086 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.03.01110.1016/j.ndteint.2018.03.011 ↗