journal article·2013-09

Noise-tolerant inverse analysis models for nondestructive evaluation of transportation infrastructure systems using neural networks

Halil Ceylan, Kasthurirangan Gopalakrishnan, Mustafa Birkan Bayrak, Alper Guclu

Publisher page

Abstract

The need to rapidly and cost-effectively evaluate the present condition of pavement infrastructure is a critical issue concerning the deterioration of ageing transportation infrastructure all around the world. Nondestructive testing (NDT) and evaluation methods are well-suited for characterising materials and determining structural integrity of pavement systems. The falling weight deflectometer (FWD) is a NDT equipment used to assess the structural condition of highway and airfield pavement systems and to determine the moduli of pavement layers. This involves static or dynamic inverse analysis (referred to as backcalculation) of FWD deflection profiles in the pavement surface under a simulated truck load. The main objective of this study was to employ biologically inspired computational systems to develop robust pavement layer moduli backcalculation algorithms that can tolerate noise or inaccuracies in the FWD deflection data collected in the field. Artificial neural systems, also known as artificial neural networks (ANNs), are valuable computational intelligence tools that are increasingly being used to solve resource-intensive complex engineering problems. Unlike the linear elastic layered theory commonly used in pavement layer backcalculation, non-linear unbound aggregate base and subgrade soil response models were used in an axisymmetric finite element structural analysis programme to generate synthetic database for training and testing the ANN models. In order to develop more robust networks that can tolerate the noisy or inaccurate pavement deflection patterns in the NDT data, several network architectures were trained with varying levels of noise in them. The trained ANN models were capable of rapidly predicting the pavement layer moduli and critical pavement responses (tensile strains at the bottom of the asphalt concrete layer, compressive strains on top of the subgrade layer and the deviator stresses on top of the subgrade layer), and also pavement surface deflections with very low average errors comparable with those obtained directly from the finite element analyses.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Haas R. · 1994
2. R.A. Macdonald, Pavement technology project in Thailand, Road Directorate, Report No. 119, Danish Road Institute, Denmark, 2002
3. Brown S.F. · 1981 · 17
4. Thompson M.R. · 1985 · 50
5. N. Garg, E. Tutumluer, and M.R. Thompson, Structural modeling concepts for the design of airport pavements for heavy aircraft, Proceedings, Fifth International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields, July, Trondheim (1998)
6. M.R. Thompson, ILLI-PAVE based conventional flexible pavement design procedure, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Nottingham (1992)
7. Meier R.W. · 1995 · 72
8. Trentin E. · Inf. Sci. Int. J. · 2003 · 156 · 5510.1016/S0020-0255(03)00164-6 ↗
9. Gucunski N. · 1996 · 6
10. Meier R.W. · 1997 · 126
11. Khazanovich L. · 1997 · 143
12. H. Ceylan, E. Tutumluer, and E.J. Barenberg, Artificial neural networks as design tools in concrete airfield pavement design, Proceedings of the 25th ASCE international Air Transportation Conference, Austin, TX. American Society of Civil Enginers (ASCE), Reston, VA (1998), pp. 447–465
13. Kim Y. · 1998 · 53
14. S.J. Bredenhann and M.F.C. van de Ven, Application of aritificial neural networks in the back-calculation of flexible pavement layer moduli from deflection measurements, Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa (CAPSA'04), Sun City, South Africa (2004)
15. Haykin S. · 1999
16. P. Werbos, Beyond regression: New tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences, Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, Cambridge, MA (1974)
17. 10.1038/323533a010.1038/323533a0 ↗
18. Hicks R.G. · 1971 · 15
19. Uzan J. · 1985 · 52
20. Rada G. · 1981 · 23
21. Thompson M.R. · Transport. Eng. J. ASCE · 1979 · 105 · 7110.1061/TPEJAN.0000772 ↗
22. Raad L. · Transport. Eng. J. ASCE · 1980 · 16 · 11110.1061/TPEJAN.0000830 ↗
23. J. Uzan, M.W. Witczak, T. Scullion, and R.L. Lytton, Development and validation of realistic pavement response models, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Nottingham. International Society for Asphalt Pavements (ISAP), Lino Lakes, MN (1992), Vol. 1, pp. 334–350
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:1(25)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:1(25) ↗
25. Meier, R. and Tutumluer, E. 1998. “Uses of artificial neural networks in the mechanistic-empirical design of flexible pavements”. 1–12. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Methods in Pavement and Geomechanical Engineering Systems, Florida International University, Miami, FL
26. Goktepe B. · ARI Bull. Istanbul Tech. Univ. · 2004 · 54 · 65
27. 10.1080/1029843050015098110.1080/10298430500150981 ↗
28. H. Ceylan, Analysis and design of concrete pavement systems using artificial neural networks, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, December (2002)
29. R. Mooney, R. Shavlik, G. Towell, and A. Gove, An experimental comparison of symbolic and connectionist learning algorithms, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-89), 20–25 August, Detroit, MI (1989), pp. 775–780
30. LeCun Y. · 1993