journal article·2020-04-02

Non-destructive determination of microstructural/mechanical properties and thickness variations in API X65 steel using magnetic hysteresis loop and artificial neural networks

Ali Mirzaee, Saeed Kahrobaee, Iman Ahadi Akhlaghi

Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, a combination of non-destructive magnetic technique and artificial neural networks is introduced, firstly, to ensure that the heat treatment process applied to a given API X65 steel sample results in desired microstructure and mechanical properties and secondly, to determine thickness variation which may occurs as a result of corrosion effect. To evaluate the effects of microstructure/mechanical properties and thickness variations on magnetic parameters, the magnetic hysteresis loop method has been applied on API X65 steel specimens with the thicknesses of 1–4 mm, each subjected to four different heat-treating cycles (austenitised samples were cooled in furnace, air, oil and water). It was found that the magnetic parameters extracted from hysteresis loop are strongly dependent on both the cooling rate of the applied heat treatment (which varies the morphology and grain size of ferrite phase), and thickness of the sample. In the proposed method, probabilistic and radial-basis function neural networks have been used to simultaneously determine the microstructure, mechanical properties and thickness with high reliability and accuracy. Experimental results show that using a simple probabilistic neural network, the type of heat-treatment process applied to the sample under test could be perfectly determined. Moreover, thickness estimation of the sample, with a radial basis neural network, has an error less than 0.05 mm, which is actually outstanding.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Sadjad University of Technology

Department of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, Sadjad University of Technology

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Specifications A. 5L. Specifications for line pipe. Washington (DC): American Petroleum Institute; 2007.
2. Terada Y, Tamehiro H, Yamashita M, et al. Development of API X100 UOE line pipe. Nippon Steel Tech Rep. 1997;(72):47–52.
3. Sherif E-SM, Almajid AA, Khalil KA, et al. Electrochemical studies on the corrosion behavior of API X65 pipeline steel in chloride solutions. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2013;8:9360–9370.10.1016/S1452-3981(23)12975-0 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.10.08910.1016/j.msea.2010.10.089 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2012.05.01110.1016/j.ijpvp.2012.05.011 ↗
6. Lesselier D, Reboud C. Electromagnetic non-destructive evaluation (XXI). Vol. 43. IOS Press; 2018.
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.04010.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.040 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.01.00110.1016/j.jmmm.2014.01.001 ↗
9. Jolfaei M, Shen J, Smith A, et al. Non-destructive measurement of microstructure and tensile strength in varying thickness commercial DP steel strip using an EM Sensor. J Magn Magn Mater. 2018.
10. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.03.04910.1016/j.jmmm.2018.03.049 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.03.01510.1016/j.jmmm.2017.03.015 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.02.00710.1016/j.jmmm.2015.02.007 ↗
13. Kahrobaee S, Norouzi Sahraei H, Ahadi Akhlaghi I. Nondestructive characterization of microstructure and mechanical properties of heat treated H13 tool steel using magnetic hysteresis loop methodology. Res Nondestr Eval. 2019;1–13.
14. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.109110.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.1091 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.02.00610.1016/j.msea.2007.02.006 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.09.05910.1016/j.jmmm.2013.09.059 ↗
17. Karimian N, Wilson J, Yin W, et al., editors. Magnetic sensing for microstructural assessment of power station steels: differential permeability and magnetic hysteresis. J Phys. 2013. IOP Publishing.
18. de Macedo Silva E, Leite JP, de França Neto FA, et al. Evaluation of the magnetic permeability for the microstructural characterization of a duplex stainless steel. J Test Eval. 2014;44(3):1106–1111.10.1520/JTE20130313 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10921-016-0339-710.1007/s10921-016-0339-7 ↗
20. 10.3390/met607016410.3390/met6070164 ↗
21. Sahebalam A, Kashefi M, Kahrobaee S. Comparative study of eddy current and Barkhausen noise methods in microstructural assessment of heat treated steel parts. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval. 2014;29(3):208–218.
22. Kashefi M Kahrobaee S editors. On the application of non-destructive eddy current method for quality control of heat treated parts. 18th Congress IFHTSE Rio de Janeiro; 2010.
23. 10.1007/s11665-012-0369-y10.1007/s11665-012-0369-y ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.07.06510.1016/j.jmmm.2009.07.065 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.01.03910.1016/j.jmmm.2011.01.039 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.01.07410.1016/j.jmmm.2019.01.074 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.486209510.1063/1.4862095 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.01.07210.1016/j.jmmm.2016.01.072 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.04.00710.1016/j.measurement.2015.04.007 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.09.01110.1016/j.ndteint.2014.09.011 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.06.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2017.06.001 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.12.00810.1016/j.ndteint.2012.12.008 ↗
33. 10.1088/1361-6501/aa5afb10.1088/1361-6501/aa5afb ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.03110.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.031 ↗
35. 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2016-054510.1590/1980-5373-mr-2016-0545 ↗
36. Vejdannik M, Sadr A, de Albuquerque VHC, et al. Signal processing for NDE. Handbook of advanced non-destructive evaluation. Cham, Switzerland and New York, NY: Springer; 2018; p. 1–19.
37. Hassoun MH. Fundamentals of artificial neural networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995.
38. 10.1007/978-3-319-94463-010.1007/978-3-319-94463-0 ↗
39. 10.3390/ma705380210.3390/ma7053802 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.003 ↗
41. Durão LMP, Gonçalves D, Tavares JMR, et al. Delamination in carbon/epoxy plates drilling: tool and feed rate effect. Int J Mater Prod Technol. 2014;49:267–284.
42. 10.1080/1042691090322935410.1080/10426910903229354 ↗
43. 10.1002/jemt.2087010.1002/jemt.20870 ↗
44. de Albuquerque VHC, Cortez PC, de Alexandria AR, et al. A new solution for automatic microstructures analysis from images based on a backpropagation artificial neural network. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval. 2008;23(4):273–283.
45. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.05.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2009.05.002 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.02510.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.025 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.06210.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.062 ↗
48. 10.1088/0026-1394/47/2/S1110.1088/0026-1394/47/2/S11 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.02.11310.1016/j.jmmm.2006.02.113 ↗
50. 10.1109/20.99911910.1109/20.999119 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.01910.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.019 ↗
52. Pérez Campos R, Contreras Cuevas A, Esparza Muñoz R. Improvement of mechanical properties of API X-65 steel by non-conventional heat treatment. In: Materials Characterization. Cham, Switzerland and New York, NY: Springer; 2015. p. 71–77.
53. 10.1007/s11665-007-9184-210.1007/s11665-007-9184-2 ↗
54. 10.1155/2015/38418310.1155/2015/384183 ↗
55. Wasserman P. Advanced methods in neural computing. New York (NY): Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1993.
56. 10.3233/ICA-17054010.3233/ICA-170540 ↗
57. 10.1109/72.8034110.1109/72.80341 ↗
58. Haykin S. Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall PTR; 1994.
59. 10.1017/CBO978051154324110.1017/CBO9780511543241 ↗
60. 10.1162/neco.1991.3.2.24610.1162/neco.1991.3.2.246 ↗