journal article·2022-07-04

Scattering analysis of linear and nonlinear symmetric Lamb wave at cracks in plates

Reza Soleimanpour, Sayed Mohamad Soleimani

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed study on detecting defects in isotropic plates by studying scattering analysis of first and second harmonics of symmetric Lamb wave (S0) at cracks in aluminium plates induced by Contact Acoustic Nonlinearity (CAN) using experimental and 3D Finite Element (FE) simulation approaches. In this study, a set of models with different crack sizes and orientations are studied. The effects of crack size and crack orientation on scattering behaviour of first and second harmonics of Lamb waves are investigated . The results show that the Scattering Directivity Pattern (SDP) of Lamb wave around the cracks is significantly influenced by crack size and crack orientation. It is also shown that the largest amplitude of scattered S0 wave is acquired from forward scattering waves for linear waves while the largest amplitude of scattered S0 Lamb wave is obtained from backward scattering waves for nonlinear waves. Therefore, it is expected that pulse-echo sensor configuration enhances nonlinear wave damage detection while pitch-catch configuration may suit better when linear wave is used. It is shown that selecting proper propagation direction for incident wave and proper geometry and angle for monitoring points are the key factors to achieve successful damage detection in isotropic plates.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Australian College of Kuwait

Funding

Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Gaydeckp PA, Burdekin FM. Nondestructive testing of reinforced and pre-stressed concrete structures. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval. 1998;14:339–392.
2. Harper MF, Thompson M. Health monitoring of a complex structure using a sparse array of modally selective transducers. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval. 2005;20:159–173.
3. 10.2172/24929910.2172/249299 ↗
4. 10.1177/147592171666387610.1177/1475921716663876 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cma.2020.11289610.1016/j.cma.2020.112896 ↗
6. 10.1080/1058975870895293610.1080/10589758708952936 ↗
7. 10.1007/s13349-016-0166-710.1007/s13349-016-0166-7 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00137-310.1016/S0041-624X(02)00137-3 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.02.02810.1016/j.jsv.2009.02.028 ↗
10. Roy G, Panigrahi B, Pohit G. Crack identification in beam-type structural elements using a piezoelectric sensor. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval. 2020;36:597–615.
11. 10.1109/MetroAeroSpace51421.2021.951167310.1109/MetroAeroSpace51421.2021.9511673 ↗
12. Janeliukstis R, Rucevskis S, Chate A. Condition monitoring with defect localisation in a two-dimensional structure based on linear discriminant and nearest neighbour classification of strain features. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval. 2019;35:48–72.
13. 10.1063/1.281195410.1063/1.2811954 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.316952010.1063/1.3169520 ↗
15. 10.1177/147592171667302110.1177/1475921716673021 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00186-510.1016/S0041-624X(02)00186-5 ↗
17. 10.1142/S021812740501306X10.1142/S021812740501306X ↗
18. 10.1007/978-0-387-35851-210.1007/978-0-387-35851-2 ↗
19. 10.1016/0020-7225(79)90008-910.1016/0020-7225(79)90008-9 ↗
20. 10.1177/107754632199014510.1177/1077546321990145 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.07310.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.073 ↗
22. 10.1007/978-3-030-64594-6_1410.1007/978-3-030-64594-6_14 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.07.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2009.07.004 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.01010.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.010 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.01010.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.010 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.05.03910.1016/j.jsv.2019.05.039 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00241-X10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00241-X ↗
28. 10.12989/sss.2005.1.2.18510.12989/sss.2005.1.2.185 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.01910.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.019 ↗
30. 10.1080/10589759.2021.197210310.1080/10589759.2021.1972103 ↗
31. 10.1121/1.353374110.1121/1.3533741 ↗
32. 10.1121/1.163933210.1121/1.1639332 ↗
33. Lowe M, Pavlakovic B. DISPERSE user’s manual, version 2.0.20a non-destructive testing laboratory. UK: Imperial College London; 2013.
34. 10.1016/j.cma.2005.05.04310.1016/j.cma.2005.05.043 ↗
35. 10.1016/0041-624X(96)00024-810.1016/0041-624X(96)00024-8 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.021 ↗