Hybrid active focusing with adaptive dispersion for higher defect sensitivity in guided wave inspection of cylindrical structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Ultrasonic guided wave inspection is widely used for scanning prismatic structures such as pipes for metal loss. Recent research has investigated focusing the sound energy into predetermined regions of a pipe in order to enhance the defect sensitivity. This paper presents an active focusing technique which is based on a combination of numerical simulation and time reversal concept. The proposed technique is empirically validated using a 3D laser vibrometry measurement of the focal spot. The defect sensitivity of the proposed technique is compared with conventional active focusing, time reversal focusing and synthetic focusing through an empirically validated finite element parametric study. Based on the results, the proposed technique achieves approximately 10 dB improvement of signal-to-coherent-noise ratio compared to the conventional active focusing and time reversal focusing. It is also demonstrated that the proposed technique to have an amplitude gain of around 5 dB over synthetic focusing for defects <0.5λs. The proposed technique is shown to have the potential to improve the reliably detectable flaw size in guided wave inspection from 9% to less than 1% cross-sectional area loss.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Rose JL · Mater. Eval · 2002 · 60 · 53
2. 10.1016/0041-624X(79)90006-410.1016/0041-624X(79)90006-4 ↗
3. 10.1121/1.190868510.1121/1.1908685 ↗
4. 10.1121/1.190775310.1121/1.1907753 ↗
5. 10.1121/1.190775410.1121/1.1907754 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2014.11.00310.1016/j.wavemoti.2014.11.003 ↗
7. 10.1109/TUFFC.2003.119796510.1109/TUFFC.2003.1197965 ↗
8. 10.1177/1045389012214534810.1177/10453890122145348 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.157014510.1063/1.1570145 ↗
10. Catton P. Long range ultrasonic guided waves for the quantitative inspection of pipelines [PhD thesis]; London (UK): 2009. p. 10–20.
11. 10.1784/insi.2007.49.issue-410.1784/insi.2007.49.issue-4 ↗
12. 10.1121/1.131529010.1121/1.1315290 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.206558710.1115/1.2065587 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ultras.2005.07.00210.1016/j.ultras.2005.07.002 ↗
15. 10.1121/1.154393110.1121/1.1543931 ↗
16. 10.1080/1058975070132792410.1080/10589750701327924 ↗
17. Davies JO. Inspection of pipes using low frequency focused guided waves [PhD thesis]. Imperial College London; 2008.
18. 10.1016/0165-2125(94)90039-610.1016/0165-2125(94)90039-6 ↗
19. 10.1109/58.15617410.1109/58.156174 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0041-624X(99)00010-410.1016/S0041-624X(99)00010-4 ↗
21. Rose JL · 2002
22. 10.1109/TUFFC.2002.115984910.1109/TUFFC.2002.1159849 ↗
23. 10.1109/TUFFC.2009.109810.1109/TUFFC.2009.1098 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.002 ↗
25. Behrendt R · 2005
26. 10.1006/jsvi.1995.039810.1006/jsvi.1995.0398 ↗
27. 10.1109/TUFFC.2011.190210.1109/TUFFC.2011.1902 ↗
28. ABAQUS. ABAQUS version 6.13 user’s maual. Simulia; 2013.
29. 10.1115/1.278910710.1115/1.2789107 ↗
30. 10.1784/insi.2014.56.9.50510.1784/insi.2014.56.9.505 ↗
31. 10.1109/JSEN.2015.241487410.1109/JSEN.2015.2414874 ↗
32. Alleyne D. The nondestructive testing for plates using ultrasonic lamb waves [PhD thesis]. Imperial College London; 1991.
33. Lysmer J · J. Eng. Mech. Div · 1969 · 95 · 85910.1061/JMCEA3.0001144 ↗
34. Oliver DE · 2007
35. 10.1121/1.186257210.1121/1.1862572 ↗
36. 10.1121/1.158243910.1121/1.1582439 ↗