journal article·2019-04-03

Accuracy of X-ray diffraction measurement of residual stresses in shot peened titanium alloy samples

Xuesong Fu, Zhiqiang Niu, Ying Deng, Jie Zhang, Chongyuan Liu, Guoqing Chen, Zhiqiang Li, Wenlong Zhou

Publisher page

Abstract

Accuracy of residual stress measurement using the Sin^2 ψ method has become a focus in many applications where residual stress plays a critical role in components, such as aeronautics, railway welding, bearings, gears, etc. Accuracy in residual stress measurement requires consideration of both correctness and uncertainty. In this paper, a self-designed and home-made in-situ tension/compression device is adapted to evaluate the correctness of residual stress measurement in titanium alloy. A calculation method employing multiple convolutions to evaluate the uncertainty of residual stress measurement is presented. Test results show that the X-ray elastic constant is an important parameter impacting the correctness of residual stress measurement. And that the uncertainty of residual stress measurement fluctuates with the surface status of shot peened samples.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Solidification Control and Digital Preparation Technology (Liaoning Province), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, PR China

Aeronautical Science and Technology Key Laboratory for Plastic Forming, Avic Manufacturing Technology Institute, Beijing, PR China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · Foundation of Liaoning Educational Committee

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00698-X10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00698-X ↗
2. 10.1080/10589759.2016.114958110.1080/10589759.2016.1149581 ↗
3. 10.1080/10589759.2015.107085010.1080/10589759.2015.1070850 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.07.10810.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.07.108 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.06.01510.1016/j.actamat.2014.06.015 ↗
6. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.404-407.2910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.404-407.29 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.04.06610.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.04.066 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.05.04210.1016/j.tsf.2009.05.042 ↗
9. 10.1002/pssa.221146020810.1002/pssa.2211460208 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.273374510.1063/1.2733745 ↗
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.404-407.34110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.404-407.341 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.10.04910.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.10.049 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.12.00910.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.12.009 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.10.03210.1016/j.msea.2018.10.032 ↗
15. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.748.38110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.748.381 ↗
16. 10.21741/9781945291173-710.21741/9781945291173-7 ↗
17. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.638-642.243410.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.638-642.2434 ↗
18. 10.1046/j.1475-1305.2003.00044.x10.1046/j.1475-1305.2003.00044.x ↗
19. Szymanski W · Adv Mater Sci · 2014 · 14 · 10210.2478/adms-2014-0026 ↗
20. Pencea I · Univ Politehnica Buchar Sci Bull Ser A · 2013 · 75 · 275