Theoretical model-based quantitative optimisation of numerical modelling for eddy current NDT
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Eddy current (EC) nondestructive testing (NDT) is one of the most widely used NDT methods. Numerical modelling of NDT methods has been used as an important investigative approach alongside experimental and theoretical studies. This paper investigates the set-up of numerical modelling using finite-element method in terms of the optimal selection of element mesh size in different regions within the model based on theoretical analysis of EC NDT. The modelling set-up is refined and evaluated through numerical simulation, balancing both computation time and simulation accuracy. A case study in the optimisation of the modelling set-up of the EC NDT system with a cylindrical probe coil is carried out to verify the proposed optimisation approach. Here, the mesh size of the simulation model is set based on the geometries of the coil and the magnetic sensor, as well as on the skin depth in the sample; so the optimised modelling set-up can be useful even when the geometry of EC system, the excitation frequency or the pulsed width is changed in multi-frequency EC, sweep-frequency EC or system and pulsed EC. Furthermore, this optimisation approach can be used to improve the trade-off between accuracy and the computation time in other more complex EC NDT simulations. Keywords: eddy current nondestructive testing (EC NDT)numerical modellingquantitative optimisationmesh sizeregions of interest (ROI) Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the NSFC (grant no. 51005039), EPSRC UK (grant no. EP/E010458/1) and the special plan for the enterprise correspondent of commissioner's action issued by Guangdong Province, Ministry of Education and department of Science and Technology of China for funding the research. The authors also thank Associate Professor Yong Li of Xi'an Jiaotong University for providing the ETREE model and for valuable discussions. Notes 1. Email: xinhua.li@ncl.ac.uk 2. Email: anthony.simm@ncl.ac.uk 3. Email: g.y.tian@ncl.ac.uk Additional informationNotes on contributorsXinhua Li 1 Anthony Simm 2 Guiyun Tian 3
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TMAG.1985.106420110.1109/TMAG.1985.1064201 ↗
2. 10.1109/20.10640210.1109/20.106402 ↗
3. Jin J. · 2002
4. P. Burrascano, E. Cardelli, A. Faba, S. Fiori, and A. Massinelli, Numerical analysis of eddy current non-destructive testing, in Proceedings of the E'NDE Conference, Budapest, Hungary, June 28–30, 2000, pp. 333–340
5. 10.1134/S106183090612007210.1134/S1061830906120072 ↗
6. E. Nelson, Advances in 3D electromagnetic finite element modeling, in Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 12–16 May, 1997, pp. 1837–184010.1109/PAC.1997.751034 ↗
7. Y. Yu, P. Du, and Z. Wang, Study on the electromagnetic properties of eddy current sensor, in IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Canada, vol. 4, 29 July–1 August, 2005, pp. 1970–197510.1109/ICMA.2005.1626864 ↗
8. 10.1109/74.54440510.1109/74.544405 ↗
9. 10.1109/TMAG.2005.84628110.1109/TMAG.2005.846281 ↗
10. 10.1109/TMAG.2007.90493010.1109/TMAG.2007.904930 ↗
11. 10.1109/JSEN.2004.83912910.1109/JSEN.2004.839129 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.sna.2005.07.01310.1016/j.sna.2005.07.013 ↗
13. Zienkiewicz O.C. · 2005
14. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.04810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.048 ↗
15. 10.1243/09544062JMES64110.1243/09544062JMES641 ↗
16. 10.1109/TMAG.2004.82471410.1109/TMAG.2004.824714 ↗
17. 10.1109/TMAG.2005.84607910.1109/TMAG.2005.846079 ↗
18. Song H. · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1990 · 28 · 1178