Development of computational inversion techniques to size cracks from eddy current signals
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper reviews the recent advance in computational inversion techniques to size defects using eddy current signals. Studies reporting the sizing of artificial slits with the aid of computational inversion techniques are briefly overviewed and then several recent studies dealing with the sizing of fatigue and stress corrosion cracks are introduced. The results of the studies confirm computational techniques for sizing slits are sufficiently mature, and even though the measured signals are polluted with high noise, the boundary profile of slits can be evaluated from the signals. Furthermore, the studies demonstrate fatigue cracks can be dealt with almost identically to artificial slits from the viewpoint of eddy current testing; fatigue cracks introduced inside weld with a rough surface are well sized using eddy current testing with the aid of computational inversion techniques. In contrast, there is a large discrepancy between artificial slits and stress corrosion cracks, and thus conventional approaches are not always applicable to the sizing of stress corrosion cracks. This paper introduces several recent activities in the author's group to overcome this problem.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
a Nuclear Professional School, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo , 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo , 113-8656 , Japan
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Bowler J.R. · Int. J. Appl. Electromagnet. Mech. · 1997 · 8 · 3
2. 10.1023/A:102189852062610.1023/A:1021898520626 ↗
3. Udpa S.S. · 2004 · 5 · 61
4. Palanisamy R. · Mater. Eval. · 1980 · 38 · 39
5. 10.1109/20.4388510.1109/20.43885 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0056875810.1007/BF00568758 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0073088810.1007/BF00730888 ↗
8. 10.1109/20.25065910.1109/20.250659 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.218455510.1063/1.2184555 ↗
10. 10.1080/0934984059096167010.1080/09349840590961670 ↗
11. A. Skarlatos, G. Pichenot, D. Lesselier, M. Lambert, and B. Duchene, Numerical modeling of ferromagnetic tube inspection via an integral equation approach, in Presented at 6th International Conference on NDE in relation to Structural Integrity for Nuclear and Pressurized Components. 8–10 October 2007, Budapest, Hungary
12. Chen Z. · J. Nondestr. Eval. · 1998 · 17 · 167
13. 10.1007/BF0299548410.1007/BF02995484 ↗
14. 10.1109/20.71759610.1109/20.717596 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.35335910.1063/1.353359 ↗
16. Bowler J. · 1995 · 31
17. Popa R.C. · J. Nondestr. Eval. · 1998 · 17 · 209
18. Takagi T. · 2000 · 235
19. Huang H. · 2002 · 218
20. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.01.00510.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.01.005 ↗
21. 10.1023/A:102265222159810.1023/A:1022652221598 ↗
22. 10.1109/20.99625910.1109/20.996259 ↗
23. 10.1109/TMAG.2004.82532210.1109/TMAG.2004.825322 ↗
24. 10.1109/TMAG.2006.87096710.1109/TMAG.2006.870967 ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0074258310.1007/BF00742583 ↗
26. 10.1109/20.87777110.1109/20.877771 ↗
27. Yusa N. · Int. J. Appl. Electrom. Mech. · 2000 · 12 · 139
28. 10.1109/TMAG.2004.82411610.1109/TMAG.2004.824116 ↗
29. 10.1080/1068276041000171015010.1080/10682760410001710150 ↗
30. Badics Z. · 1995 · 21
31. Ohshima K. · J. Jpn. Society Appl. Electromagnet. Mech. · 2000 · 10 · 384
32. Morozov M. · 2007 · 267
33. 10.1115/1.243571810.1115/1.2435718 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.02.01110.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.02.011 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.10.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2005.10.007 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0963-8695(03)00067-710.1016/S0963-8695(03)00067-7 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.10.01210.1016/j.ndteint.2006.10.012 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.06.01610.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.06.016 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.04.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2007.04.002 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.05.07110.1016/j.matlet.2006.05.071 ↗
41. Randle W.R. · Mater. Eval. · 1991 · 49 · 44
42. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.06.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2005.06.001 ↗
43. Chady T. · 2000 · 87
44. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.03.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2006.03.005 ↗
45. Hagemaier D.J. · Mater. Eval. · 1985 · 43 · 1438