Phased array ultrasonic evaluation of domestic and imported thermite welds: defect detection and performance analysis in railroad applications
Source abstract
Abstract
This study demonstrates the superior capability of Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing (PAUT) over conventional ultrasonic methods for inspecting thermite welds in railroad applications. The research evaluated both domestically produced and imported thermite powders (two Asian and two European brands), with PAUT proving significantly more effective in detecting and characterising critical defects. The system successfully identified distributed microporosity (2–53 μm) and centre-line imperfections at weld interfaces, while conventional methods showed limited detection sensitivity for sub-surface flaws. PAUT enabled precise quantitative analysis, establishing a strong correlation between material hardness and signal quality (SNR = 0.15·HV − 30.5, R2 = 0.89) and detecting porosity clusters exceeding 50 μm known to reduce fatigue life by 40–60%. The domestic thermite powder demonstrated equivalent performance to imported alternatives in chemical composition, mechanical properties, and microstructural characteristics. PAUT’s multi-angle scanning capabilities and superior signal processing provided enhanced detection reliability in coarse-grained thermite microstructures, particularly for internal flaws that conventional methods frequently missed. This research validates both the cost-effectiveness of domestic thermite materials and PAUT’s critical role in modern rail maintenance, especially in challenging environments like Southeast Asia’s tropical climate, where rail integrity is paramount for transportation safety.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Prince of Songkla University
Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya
Funding
National Science, Research, and Innovative Fund · Prince of Songkla University
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Office NSS. Thailand national strategy summary. 2018. http://bic.moe.go.th/images/stories/pdf/NationalStrategySummary.pdf
2. Thailand SRT Procurement System. Auction declaration. [cited 2025 Mar 2] from: https://procurement.railway.co.th
3. Smith CB. Railway engineering. Canadian Engineer-Biggar, Samuel & Company; 1899.
4. Easterling K. Introduction to the physical metallurgy of welding. Elsevier; 2013.
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12224910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122249 ↗
6. 10.1243/0954409JRRT4410.1243/0954409JRRT44 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.11007610.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110076 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.02810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.028 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.11.01410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.11.014 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.471631710.1063/1.4716317 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10622710.1016/j.ultras.2020.106227 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.sna.2020.11208610.1016/j.sna.2020.112086 ↗
13. 10.1109/FENDT.2016.799202010.1109/FENDT.2016.7992020 ↗
14. Chao L, Dan D, Wensheng C. Research on phased array ultrasonic testing for rail pneumatic welding. Fail Anal Prev. 2011;6(3):139–143.
15. 10.1002/047171914510.1002/0471719145 ↗
16. ISO. ISO 10893–11: 2011: Non-destructive testing of steel tubes—part 11: Automated ultrasonic testing of the weld seam of welded steel tubes for the detection of longitudinal and/or transverse imperfections. 2011.
17. Olympus Corporation. Phased array technology: principles and benefits [white paper]. Olympus IMS; 2021. Available from: https://www.olympus-ims.com
18. 10.1051/e3sconf/20256020100910.1051/e3sconf/202560201009 ↗
19. 10.1243/09544097JRRT20910.1243/09544097JRRT209 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.147301310.1063/1.1473013 ↗
21. Garcia G Zhang J. Application of Ultrasonic Phased Arrays for Rail Flaw Inspection. DOT/FRA/ORD-06/17. Springfield VA: The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). 2006. https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/application-ultrasonic-phased-arrays-rail-flaw-inspection
22. Papaelias M, Kerkyras S, Papaelias F, et al. The future of rail inspection technology and the INTERAIL FP7 project. In: 51st Annual Conference of the British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing, Northamptonshire, UK. British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing; 2012. p. 148–156.
23. 10.1088/2053-1591/ad51db10.1088/2053-1591/ad51db ↗
24. Saita K, Karimine K, Ueda M, et al. Trends in rail welding technologies and our future approach. Nippon Steel Sumitomo Metal Technical Report. 2013;105:84–92.
25. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.03.06310.1016/j.msea.2007.03.063 ↗
26. 10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00148-710.1016/S1359-6462(99)00148-7 ↗
27. 10.1007/BF0035316710.1007/BF00353167 ↗
28. Rail AR Welding BPFBR Welding CTR. Section 34 11 25 running rail.
29. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.38410.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.384 ↗
30. 10.1115/CREEP2007-2657910.1115/CREEP2007-26579 ↗
31. Charlesworth J, Temple J. Application of ultrasonic time of flight diffraction. Berlin: Springer; 2001.
32. 10.1134/S106183091805005410.1134/S1061830918050054 ↗
33. 10.1520/E2700-2010.1520/E2700-20 ↗
34. Olympus Scientific Solutions. New book: advances in phased array ultrasonic technology applications. E-journal of nondestructive testing. 2007. Available from: https://www.ndt.net/?id=4469
35. 10.1784/insi.2015.57.11.62510.1784/insi.2015.57.11.625 ↗
36. Carter R. An introduction to phased array ultrasonic technology applications. R/D Tech; 2004.
37. BS EN 14730–1:2017 Railway applications. Track. Aluminothermic welding of rails approval of welding processes. p. 46.
38. ASTM E407-07 Standard Practice for Microetching Metals and Alloys. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM international; 2015. p. 1–21.
39. G&R Technology Inc. Ht-1000A/HT-2000A portable hardness tester operating instructions. 2014. Available from: https://grhardnesstester.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ht.pdf
40. 10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.59110.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.02.00810.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.02.008 ↗
42. Myers J, Geiger G, Poirier D. Structure and properties of thermite welds in rails. Weld J. 1982;61(8):258–268.
43. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.788.2210.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.788.22 ↗
44. 10.1007/s40194-020-00912-410.1007/s40194-020-00912-4 ↗
45. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.254.8310.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.254.83 ↗
46. 10.3390/s2101024210.3390/s21010242 ↗
47. 10.3390/s2310462710.3390/s23104627 ↗
48. 10.3390/ma1609357910.3390/ma16093579 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10548510.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105485 ↗
50. 10.1109/ICIRT.2018.864167510.1109/ICIRT.2018.8641675 ↗
51. 10.22190/FUME221217008F10.22190/FUME221217008F ↗
52. 10.1007/s11665-024-09488-210.1007/s11665-024-09488-2 ↗
53. 10.1002/9781118357002.ch6410.1002/9781118357002.ch64 ↗
54. Suikkanen P, Karjalainen P, DeArdo A. Effect of carbon content on the phase transformation characteristics, microstructure and properties of 500 MPa grade microalloyed steels with nonpolygonal ferrite microstructures. La Metallurgia Ital. 2009;6:41–54.
55. 10.1179/02670830222500755610.1179/026708302225007556 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.13410.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.134 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.wear.2020.20337710.1016/j.wear.2020.203377 ↗