A novel approach for rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on generative adversarial feature under limited data conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Limited fault data severely constrains the accuracy and reliability of deep learning-based methods, posing a great challenge to the non-destructive testing of rolling bearings. Although using Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) to augment limited data has been validated as a beneficial way, fault diagnosis is still driven by large amounts of data in most GAN-based methods. To tackle this challenge, an approach based on the generative adversarial feature is proposed, which improves the diagnosis performance by extracting critical features from limited data. First, a generative adversarial feature extraction network (FE-GAN) is developed by improving the bidirectional generative adversarial network (BiGAN) to capture featuresfrom limited data. Second, a conditional encoding strategy is constructed for the generator and discriminator of BiGAN, empowering FE-GAN to precisely differentiate high-dimensional features of different data categories. Finally, a Laplace wavelet convolution technique is designed for the encoder of BiGAN, granting FE-GAN the capability to extract impact information of each category from limited data. The experimental results on two real cases, CWRU and MFPT, show that the proposed FE-GAN combined with CNN achieves 92.26% and 89.68% recognition accuracies under the extreme condition of only 5 samples per class, outperforming most existing advanced methods, validating its effectiveness.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis · Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
North China Electric Power University
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.inffus.2018.10.00510.1016/j.inffus.2018.10.005 ↗
2. Becker WT, Shipley RJ, Lampman SR, et al. S.D.J.F.a. Henry, Prev, Asm Handb: Volume 11: Fail Anal And Prev. 2002;11:107.
3. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10751810.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107518 ↗
4. 10.1080/10589759.2024.238046210.1080/10589759.2024.2380462 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.isatra.2018.05.01710.1016/j.isatra.2018.05.017 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2020.10768610.1016/j.sigpro.2020.107686 ↗
7. 10.1109/TIM.2022.316055110.1109/TIM.2022.3160551 ↗
8. 10.3934/mbe.202253410.3934/mbe.2022534 ↗
9. 10.1080/10589759.2024.244081510.1080/10589759.2024.2440815 ↗
10. 10.1088/1361-6501/ad7a9110.1088/1361-6501/ad7a91 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ress.2021.10801710.1016/j.ress.2021.108017 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ress.2022.10852510.1016/j.ress.2022.108525 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ress.2022.10871410.1016/j.ress.2022.108714 ↗
14. 10.1080/10589759.2024.242581310.1080/10589759.2024.2425813 ↗
15. 10.1080/10589759.2024.240254910.1080/10589759.2024.2402549 ↗
16. 10.1080/10589759.2025.247410210.1080/10589759.2025.2474102 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10489-022-03344-310.1007/s10489-022-03344-3 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10462-020-09934-210.1007/s10462-020-09934-2 ↗
19. 10.1007/s12559-020-09796-410.1007/s12559-020-09796-4 ↗
20. 10.1109/TIM.2023.324423710.1109/TIM.2023.3244237 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10751010.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107510 ↗
22. 10.1109/TIA.2021.309195810.1109/TIA.2021.3091958 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.04.04510.1016/j.neucom.2020.04.045 ↗
24. Cody T, Adams S, Beling PA. Trade-offs in metric learning for bearing fault diagnosis[C]//2021. In: 20th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). Pasadena, CA, USA: IEEE; 2021. p. 1100–1105.
25. Nikolenko SI. Synthetic data for deep learning[M]. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2021.10.1007/978-3-030-75178-4 ↗
26. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al. Generative adversarial nets. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 (NIPS 2014). Montreal, Canada. 2014. p. 2672–2680.
27. Mirza M Osindero S. Conditional generative adversarial nets. 2014. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1411.1784
28. Radford A. Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. 2015. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1511.06434
29. Donahue J Krähenbühl P Darrell T. Adversarial feature learning. 2016. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1605.09782
30. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10776810.1016/j.measurement.2020.107768 ↗
31. 10.1109/TIM.2021.312636610.1109/TIM.2021.3126366 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.10866410.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108664 ↗
33. 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.320223410.1109/TNNLS.2022.3202234 ↗
34. 10.1109/TIM.2020.300934310.1109/TIM.2020.3009343 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11189910.1016/j.measurement.2022.111899 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10845-020-01579-w10.1007/s10845-020-01579-w ↗
37. 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.10946710.1016/j.measurement.2021.109467 ↗
38. 10.1093/jcde/qwad08110.1093/jcde/qwad081 ↗
39. 10.1109/TIM.2021.312597310.1109/TIM.2021.3125973 ↗
40. 10.1109/TIM.2021.308226410.1109/TIM.2021.3082264 ↗
41. 10.1109/TIM.2023.327172910.1109/TIM.2023.3271729 ↗
42. 10.1109/TMECH.2021.305806110.1109/TMECH.2021.3058061 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.10902210.1016/j.measurement.2021.109022 ↗