Utilizing linear and nonlinear ultrasound for improved estimation of concrete strength
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigated non-destructive concrete strength evaluation using in-situ cored samples. Data from various mix proportions and design strengths revealed inconsistent correlations between compressive strength and linear ultrasonic wave velocity (Vp). This inconsistency arises because Vp captures only linear elastic behaviour, whereas concrete strength reflects both linear and nonlinear behaviours. In contrast, the acoustic nonlinearity parameter (βre) exhibits superior sensitivity to microstructural conditions owing to its direct link to material nonlinearity. We proposed a new integrity index (M/β*) by combining the constrained modulus (M) derived from Vp with βre to capture the entire elastic behaviour. This index demonstrated statistically significant correlation with the factor of safety (FS) across different design strengths and mix proportions. Next, we developed a risk stratification system based on M/β* using fuzzy c-means clustering, categorising concrete into three risk zones: critical (M/β* <40), moderate (40 < M/β* <75) and low (M/β* >75), providing a quantitative tool for assessing concrete quality. The results highlight the importance of integrating linear and nonlinear ultrasonic parameters for accurate strength prediction, particularly in field conditions where traditional Vp–strength correlations are unreliable. This approach offers a new method for non-destructive concrete strength detection, thereby enhancing structural safety assessments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Yonsei University
Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST)
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
GS Construction & Engineering
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport of the Korean government through the Railway Technology Research Program
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1201/b1267410.1201/b12674 ↗
2. Feld J, Carper KL. Construction failure. NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 1996.
3. Halvorsen GT, Farahmandnia A. The Willow Island collapse: a maturity case study. Temp Eff Concr STP. 1985;858:168–176.
4. Jae-Hyuk P. GS E&C admits to faulty construction of apartment underground parking lot in Incheon. The Korea Times. 2023.
5. Eun-Ji B. All construction by HDC halted in Gwangju following disaster. The Korea Times. 2022.
6. 10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00164-110.1016/S0008-8846(98)00164-1 ↗
7. Farzampour A. Compressive behavior of concrete under environmental effects. In: Compressive strength of concrete. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2019.
8. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.11.01210.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.11.012 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2010.00622.x10.1111/j.1747-1567.2010.00622.x ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000129410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001294 ↗
11. A. International. ASTM C39. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. 2012.
12. ASTM. Standard practice for making and curing concrete test specimens in the field ASTM C31/C31M 2021.
13. ASTM. Standard test method for obtaining and testing drilled cores and sawed beams of concrete. ASTM C42 2020.
14. 10.1002/suco.20170007010.1002/suco.201700070 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.14110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.141 ↗
16. 10.1016/0008-8846(90)90079-D10.1016/0008-8846(90)90079-D ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.09.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2018.09.005 ↗
18. 10.1007/BF0247267610.1007/BF02472676 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.09.00710.1016/j.ultras.2004.09.007 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.07.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2014.07.004 ↗
21. 10.1121/1.271074510.1121/1.2710745 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10283410.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102834 ↗
23. 10.14359/5173041210.14359/51730412 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:6(628)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:6(628) ↗
25. 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00569-510.1016/S0008-8846(01)00569-5 ↗
26. Rose JL. Ultrasonic waves in solid media. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press; 2004.
27. C.E.N. EN 13791: assessment of in-situ compressive strength in structures and precast concrete components. Br. Stand. Institution; 2007 London.
28. 10.1016/j.ultras.2018.03.00610.1016/j.ultras.2018.03.006 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.11.01010.1016/j.cemconres.2016.11.010 ↗
30. 10.1617/s11527-014-0506-110.1617/s11527-014-0506-1 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.05010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.050 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ultras.2024.10738510.1016/j.ultras.2024.107385 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10921-017-0410-z10.1007/s10921-017-0410-z ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.02210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.022 ↗
35. Cantrell JH. Fundamentals and applications of nonlinear ultra- sonic nondestructive evaluation. In: Kundu T, editor. Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation. FL, USA: CRC Press; 2004. p. 363–434.
36. 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2012.08.00910.1016/j.wavemoti.2012.08.009 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.11.01410.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.11.014 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.10522510.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105225 ↗
39. A. Standard. Standard test method for pulse velocity through concrete ASTM Stand. C597–16 ASTM Int. West Conshohocken; 2016.
40. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2004.08.00710.1016/j.tafmec.2004.08.007 ↗
41. 10.3390/buildings1102004410.3390/buildings11020044 ↗
42. 10.4236/ojce.2016.6404310.4236/ojce.2016.64043 ↗