Advances in embedded sensor technologies for structural health monitoring of composite structures: a comprehensive review
Source abstract
Abstract
Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is critical for ensuring the safety and reliability of advanced composite structures. While embedded sensors offer a transformative approach to real-time monitoring, a critical challenge lies at the sensor-material interface, where integration processes and environmental factors govern long-term system performance. This review adds to existing knowledge by providing a focused, critical analysis of the specific challenges and advancements related to the integration and in-situ performance of embedded sensors in composites. A systematic literature search of the Web of Science and Scopus databases was conducted, focusing on peer-reviewed articles from the last five years related to embedded sensors, composites, and SHM. From an initial pool of over 1300 articles, 93 were selected for in-depth analysis based on specific inclusion criteria, focusing on experimental findings and novel integration techniques. The analysis reveals a clear predominance of piezoresistive sensors, particularly those using carbon-based nanomaterials, due to their excellent compatibility with composites and suitability for additive manufacturing. Key advancements in sensor integration via 3D printing (FDM, DIW, SLA) are identified, alongside significant challenges, including process-induced defects, thermal mismatch, and signal degradation from environmental factors like moisture and temperature. The findings indicate that while sensor technology has advanced, the reliability of the entire SHM system is often limited by the sensor-material interface. The move towards multifunctional, wireless, and self-powered sensors is a clear trend, but long-term durability and the inability to repair embedded sensors remain significant barriers to widespread adoption. This review concludes that future research must prioritise the development of robust, resilient sensor materials and standardised testing protocols. Integrating advanced materials like metamaterials and leveraging machine learning for predictive data analysis are crucial next steps to creating truly autonomous and reliable SHM systems for composite structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Federal University of Itajubá
Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic
Funding
CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientfíco e Tecnológico · FAPEMIG (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/s2319827910.3390/s23198279 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11872310.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118723 ↗
3. 10.3390/s2309433410.3390/s23094334 ↗
4. Wilson CL, Lonkar K, Roy S, et al. 7.20 Structural health monitoring of composites. In: Beaumont PW Zweben CH, editors. Comprehensive composite materials II. Oxford: Elsevier; 2018. p. 382–407.10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10039-6 ↗
5. Wu W, Cantero-Chinchilla S, Prescott D, et al. A general approach to assessing SHM reliability considering sensor failures based on information theory. Reliab Eng System Saf. 2024;250:110267.10.1016/j.ress.2024.110267 ↗
6. 10.12989/smm.2017.4.1.00110.12989/smm.2017.4.1.001 ↗
7. Khan AA, Zafar S, Khan N, et al. History current status and challenges to structural health monitoring system aviation field. J Space Technol. 2014.;4(1):67–74.
8. 10.1007/s13349-023-00698-110.1007/s13349-023-00698-1 ↗
9. 10.56748/ejse.14193110.56748/ejse.141931 ↗
10. Katam R, Pasupuleti VDK, Kalapatapu P. A review on structural health monitoring: past to present. Innovative Infrastruct Sol. 2023.;8(9):248.10.1007/s41062-023-01217-3 ↗
11. Hao B, Ma P. Carbon nanotubes for defect monitoring in fiber-reinforced polymer composites. In: Peng H, Li Q, Checn T, editors. Industrial applications of carbon nanotubes. Elsevier; 2017. p. 71–99.10.1016/B978-0-323-41481-4.00003-4 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.09.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2017.09.006 ↗
13. 10.1109/COMST.2017.269155110.1109/COMST.2017.2691551 ↗
14. Sabato A, Niezrecki C, Fortino G. Wireless MEMS-based accelerometer sensor boards for structural vibration monitoring: a review. IEEE Sensors J. 2016.;17(2):226–235.10.1109/JSEN.2016.2630008 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cja.2019.09.01710.1016/j.cja.2019.09.017 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.renene.2012.08.07210.1016/j.renene.2012.08.072 ↗
17. HBM. Embedded vs. conventional strain gauges. 2025. [cited 2025. 04 8]. Available from: https://www.hbkworld.com/en/knowledge/resource-center/case-studies/embedded-vs-conventional-strain-gauges
18. Kumar S, Singh D, Mahato DK. PZT-based piezoelectric materials: from synthesis to functional properties and diverse applications. In: Singh NB, Mahato DK, editors. Piezoelectric Materials. Jenny Stanford Publishing; 2025. p. 47–73.
19. 10.1063/5.016745110.1063/5.0167451 ↗
20. 10.20517/gmo.2023.0510.20517/gmo.2023.05 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11223110.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112231 ↗
22. 10.1080/10408436.2019.158870510.1080/10408436.2019.1588705 ↗
23. 10.1557/JMR.1999.010510.1557/JMR.1999.0105 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.07810.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.078 ↗
25. 10.14359/5168948610.14359/51689486 ↗
26. 10.3390/eng202001310.3390/eng2020013 ↗
27. 10.1007/s11664-021-08928-210.1007/s11664-021-08928-2 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.sna.2016.12.01110.1016/j.sna.2016.12.011 ↗
29. 10.1002/adfm.20210024510.1002/adfm.202100245 ↗
30. 10.1088/0268-1242/30/7/07400110.1088/0268-1242/30/7/074001 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.15510.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.155 ↗
32. 10.3390/ma1613463610.3390/ma16134636 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.aej.2024.05.00210.1016/j.aej.2024.05.002 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cis.2024.10309510.1016/j.cis.2024.103095 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11079610.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110796 ↗
36. 10.1088/1361-6463/adade510.1088/1361-6463/adade5 ↗
37. 10.1002/smll.20210639210.1002/smll.202106392 ↗
38. 10.1080/17452759.2024.233115310.1080/17452759.2024.2331153 ↗
39. Dijkshoorn A, Werkman P, Welleweerd M, et al. Embedded sensing: integrating sensors in 3-D printed structures. J Sens Sens Syst. 2018.;7(1):169–181.10.5194/jsss-7-169-2018 ↗
40. 10.3390/nano1324314810.3390/nano13243148 ↗
41. 10.3390/s2304220410.3390/s23042204 ↗
42. 10.1063/5.028098410.1063/5.0280984 ↗
43. Yang X, Huang Y, Zhang Z, et al. Molecular dynamics study on silane coupling agent grafting to optimize the interfacial microstructure and physical properties of polyimide/nano-Si. Materials. 2025.;18(18):4425.10.3390/ma18184425 ↗
44. Wang W, Ye Y, Liu L, et al. High thermal conductivity diamond-copper composites prepared via hot pressing with tungsten-coated interfacial layer optimization. Materials. 2025.;18(16):3882.10.3390/ma18163882 ↗
45. 10.1109/JSEN.2025.359742210.1109/JSEN.2025.3597422 ↗
46. Wu C, Gao X, Zhu H, et al. Multiscale stress transmission regulation toward flexible strain sensors with high stability. Adv Funct Mater. 2025;35:e10852.
47. Nautiyal P, Paul T, Zhang C, et al. A critique on boron nitride nanotube reinforced metal matrix composites. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci. 2024;49(3):482–519.
48. Xiaoli Y, Liang F, Chen H, et al. Interface damage and failure mechanisms of CF/PEEK composite components in hygrothermal environments: experimental and molecular dynamics study. J Thermoplast Composite Mater. 2025;1–24.
49. 10.1177/0021998325137654910.1177/00219983251376549 ↗
50. 10.3390/polym1702018110.3390/polym17020181 ↗
51. 10.1007/s10443-024-10292-310.1007/s10443-024-10292-3 ↗
52. Haeckell MW, Rolfes R, Kane MB, et al. Three-tier modular structural health monitoring framework using environmental and operational condition clustering for data normalization: validation on an operational wind turbine system. Proc IEEE. 2016.;104(8):1632–1646.10.1109/JPROC.2016.2566602 ↗
53. 10.1186/s43251-020-00014-710.1186/s43251-020-00014-7 ↗
54. Liu X, Dong X, Wang Y. Field testing of Martlet wireless sensing system on an in-service pre-stressed concrete highway bridge. In: Kundu T, editor. Health monitoring of structural and biological systems 2016. Vol. 9805. SPIE; 2016. p. 507–513.
55. 10.1177/168781401769621010.1177/1687814017696210 ↗
56. 10.3390/electronics1006066110.3390/electronics10060661 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.iintel.2023.10006610.1016/j.iintel.2023.100066 ↗
58. 10.3390/jsan703003010.3390/jsan7030030 ↗
59. Luo Y-Z, Shen Y-B, Fu W, et al. Implementation of SHM system for Hangzhou East Railway Station using a wireless sensor network. Smart Struct Syst Int J. 2021.;27(1):19–33.
60. Acellent technologies Inc.. Smart layer sensors. 2025. [cited 2025. 04 8]. Available from: https://www.acellent.com/products/smart-layer-sensors
61. 10.1002/stc.193410.1002/stc.1934 ↗
62. 10.1109/JSEN.2020.297071010.1109/JSEN.2020.2970710 ↗
63. 10.3390/s2121732710.3390/s21217327 ↗
64. Fu Y, Zhu L, Hoang T, et al. Demand-based wireless smart sensors for earthquake monitoring of civil infrastructure. In: Wang K-W, Sohn H, Lynch JP, editors. Sensors and smart structures technologies for civil, mechanical, and aerospace systems 2018. Vol. 10598. SPIE; 2018. p. 245–251.
65. 10.3390/s2215570110.3390/s22155701 ↗
66. 10.3390/s2124821310.3390/s21248213 ↗
67. 10.3390/ma1310224910.3390/ma13102249 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10759510.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107595 ↗
69. 10.1177/1475921722109899810.1177/14759217221098998 ↗
70. 10.3390/s2316711610.3390/s23167116 ↗
71. 10.1038/s41377-024-01392-710.1038/s41377-024-01392-7 ↗
72. 10.3390/buildings1304091810.3390/buildings13040918 ↗
73. Blackshire JL, Cooney A. Evaluation and improvement in sensor performance and durability for structural health monitoring systems. In: Meyendorf N, Baaklini GY, Michel B, editors. Advanced sensor technologies for nondestructive evaluation and structural health monitoring II. Vol. 6179. SPIE; 2006. p. 137–146.
74. Blackshire JL, Giurgiutiu V, Cooney A, et al. Characterization of sensor performance and durability for structural health monitoring systems. In: Meyendorf N, Baaklini GY, Michel B, editors. Advanced sensor technologies for nondestructive evaluation and structural health monitoring. Vol. 5770. SPIE; 2005. p. 66–75.10.1117/12.599888 ↗
75. 10.3390/machines1011110310.3390/machines10111103 ↗
76. 10.1088/1361-6501/ad69b110.1088/1361-6501/ad69b1 ↗
77. Glashier T, Kromanis R, Buchanan C. Temperature-based damage detection for the commissioning dataset of the MX3D bridge. In: 11th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, EWSHM 2024, Potsdam, Germany; 2024.
78. Eiras JN, Gavérina L, Mastromatteo L, et al. Effects of thermally induced distress on adhesively bonded piezoelectric wafer active sensors and implications on damage detection and localization. Struct Health Monit. 2023;2023:36925.
79. 10.58286/2986710.58286/29867 ↗
80. 10.3390/jcs812051810.3390/jcs8120518 ↗
81. Fauche R, Pfeiffer H, Seveno D, et al. Resistive response of carbon-black-epoxy nanocomposites upon exposure to moisture. Struct Health Monit 2023. 2023;36996.10.12783/shm2023/36996 ↗
82. Tsitsas P, Rekatsinas C, Barouni A, et al. Effect of moisture on the sensing capabilities of piezoelectric actuator/sensor pairs on flax fibre reinforced composite laminates. In: 11th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, EWSHM 2024, NDT, Potsdam, Germany. net, 2024.
83. 10.1177/00219983760100010110.1177/002199837601000101 ↗
84. Boehme B, Roellig M, Wolter K-J. Moisture induced change of the viscoelastic material properties of adhesives for SHM sensor applications. In: 2010 Proceedings 60th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. IEEE; 2010. p. 1885–1892.10.1109/ECTC.2010.5490701 ↗
85. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/7/07502410.1088/0964-1726/25/7/075024 ↗
86. 10.1038/s41598-021-89750-y10.1038/s41598-021-89750-y ↗
87. 10.1016/j.snb.2024.13577010.1016/j.snb.2024.135770 ↗
88. 10.3390/jcs806020110.3390/jcs8060201 ↗
89. 10.3390/s2517525910.3390/s25175259 ↗
90. 10.3390/s2212451110.3390/s22124511 ↗
91. 10.1109/JSEN.2024.350291410.1109/JSEN.2024.3502914 ↗
92. 10.3390/s2004112210.3390/s20041122 ↗
93. 10.3390/s2006166110.3390/s20061661 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13506710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135067 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.addma.2024.10432410.1016/j.addma.2024.104324 ↗
96. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.11018810.1016/j.optlastec.2023.110188 ↗
97. 10.1007/s11801-025-4027-710.1007/s11801-025-4027-7 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.addma.2023.10347010.1016/j.addma.2023.103470 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10324310.1016/j.addma.2022.103243 ↗
100. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11526610.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115266 ↗