Few-shot fault diagnosis of rail transit switch machine based on sparse convolution capsule relation network
Source abstract
Abstract
The switch machine is the foundational rail transit signal equipment, which has an essential impact on the safety and reliability of rail transit. Aiming at the challenge of inadequate diagnostic precision and flexibility caused by the scarcity of fault samples in the real scene of switch machines, a few-shot fault diagnosis method based on a sparse convolutional capsule relation network is proposed. First, a one-dimensional sparse convolution capsule network is proposed to approximate the sparse combination of different fault features, reduce the interference of the outside world to the original signal, and strengthen the feature extraction ability of the action current. Then, the relationship metric module is used to measure and classify these feature vectors. Finally, the proposed approach is demonstrated by different small sample experiments under two conversion states. The testing results demonstrate that compared with the other five approaches, the proposed approach achieves the highest diagnostic accuracy, reaching 96.98% and 96.05% in the two conversion states, which meets the practical application requirements of the rail transit switch machine.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
South China University of Technology
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/10589759.2024.243038410.1080/10589759.2024.2430384 ↗
2. 10.1109/TITS.2022.322148410.1109/TITS.2022.3221484 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10763410.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107634 ↗
4. 10.1093/tse/tdac03610.1093/tse/tdac036 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.10884710.1016/j.engappai.2024.108847 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.03.02110.1016/j.jmsy.2025.03.021 ↗
7. 10.1109/TIM.2024.352267810.1109/TIM.2024.3522678 ↗
8. 10.1080/10589759.2024.232875010.1080/10589759.2024.2328750 ↗
9. 10.1109/TIM.2020.302936510.1109/TIM.2020.3029365 ↗
10. 10.1088/1361-6501/ad11cc10.1088/1361-6501/ad11cc ↗
11. 10.1088/1361-6501/acb0ea10.1088/1361-6501/acb0ea ↗
12. 10.1109/TITS.2023.323963610.1109/TITS.2023.3239636 ↗
13. 10.1177/036119811983722210.1177/0361198119837222 ↗
14. 10.1109/MITS.2023.329537610.1109/MITS.2023.3295376 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10721910.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107219 ↗
16. 10.1080/10589759.2024.244949610.1080/10589759.2024.2449496 ↗
17. 10.1109/TVT.2022.315843610.1109/TVT.2022.3158436 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ress.2025.11090710.1016/j.ress.2025.110907 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.aei.2025.10312310.1016/j.aei.2025.103123 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.aei.2025.10319710.1016/j.aei.2025.103197 ↗
21. 10.1093/tse/tdac04510.1093/tse/tdac045 ↗
22. 10.1109/ITSC57777.2023.1042226610.1109/ITSC57777.2023.10422266 ↗
23. 10.1061/JTEPBS.000043210.1061/JTEPBS.0000432 ↗
24. 10.3390/s2223943810.3390/s22239438 ↗
25. 10.1109/TIM.2020.299886310.1109/TIM.2020.2998863 ↗
26. 10.1080/10589759.2025.245236410.1080/10589759.2025.2452364 ↗
27. 10.1088/1361-6501/ad951410.1088/1361-6501/ad9514 ↗
28. 10.1109/JSEN.2024.349486110.1109/JSEN.2024.3494861 ↗
29. 10.1109/TIM.2020.304230010.1109/TIM.2020.3042300 ↗
30. 10.3390/s2413440210.3390/s24134402 ↗
31. 10.1109/JIOT.2024.336234310.1109/JIOT.2024.3362343 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2025.11056310.1016/j.apacoust.2025.110563 ↗
33. 10.1088/1361-6501/abe5e310.1088/1361-6501/abe5e3 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10845-023-02123-210.1007/s10845-023-02123-2 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.knosys.2023.11045210.1016/j.knosys.2023.110452 ↗
36. 10.1109/TII.2022.316502710.1109/TII.2022.3165027 ↗
37. 10.1109/TIM.2022.318189410.1109/TIM.2022.3181894 ↗
38. 10.1080/10589759.2024.240448910.1080/10589759.2024.2404489 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.knosys.2023.11063410.1016/j.knosys.2023.110634 ↗
40. 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.323239410.1109/TNNLS.2022.3232394 ↗
41. Sabour S, Frosst N, Hinton GE. Dynamic routing between capsules. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; Long Beach, California, USA; 2017. p. 3859–3869.
42. 10.1109/CVPR.2018.0013110.1109/CVPR.2018.00131 ↗
43. Dai X, Li M, Zhai P, et al. Revisiting sparse convolutional model for visual recognition. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2022;35:10492–10504.10.52202/068431-0762 ↗
44. Finn C, Abbeel P, Levine S. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks. In: In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning; Sydney, NSW, Australia; 2017. p. 1126–1135.
45. Snell J, Swersky K, Zemel RS. Prototypical networks for few-shot learning. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; Long Beach, California, USA; 2017. p. 4080–4090.
46. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10751010.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107510 ↗
47. 10.1109/TIM.2022.323048010.1109/TIM.2022.3230480 ↗