Optimisation strategy for coplanar array capacitance imaging in rotational scanning mode
Source abstract
Abstract
Coplanar array capacitive imaging represents a non-destructive testing technology. To address the challenge of reduced utilisation of the high-sensitivity region caused by the ‘soft field’ effect characterised by severe nonlinear and inhomogeneous distribution of coplanar array capacitance sensitivity, resulting in difficulties in solving the problem of medium distribution, the proposed approach involves coplanar array capacitance sensor rotational scanning technology. This paper establishes both a physical rotation model and a sensitive field rotation model for a coplanar array capacitance sensor, demonstrating the inability to resolve the low-sensitivity region for medium distribution and illustrating how rotary scanning detection can enhance the utilisation rate of the high-sensitivity region. In conjunction with improved regional energy contrast, the images acquired under various rotation angles are fused, and experimental verification is conducted. The experimental results underscore that rotational scanning detection techniques can increase the utilisation rate of the high-sensitivity region within the coplanar array capacitance sensor by 74.69%. This enhancement effectively captures essential information within the reconstructed image and successfully addresses the challenge of solving difficulties in dielectric distribution. The research outcomes provide valuable insights for advancing non-destructive testing technologies employing coplanar array capacitance sensors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Yanshan University
Funding
S&T Program of Hebei
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/cjce.2374810.1002/cjce.23748 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apt.2023.10396210.1016/j.apt.2023.103962 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11771-022-5171-x10.1007/s11771-022-5171-x ↗
4. 10.1080/10589759.2023.219823310.1080/10589759.2023.2198233 ↗
5. 10.1784/insi.2012.55.12.67510.1784/insi.2012.55.12.675 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10470-018-01383-w10.1007/s10470-018-01383-w ↗
7. 10.1088/1361-6501/abb48410.1088/1361-6501/abb484 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.10226110.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102261 ↗
9. 10.3390/s1801003110.3390/s18010031 ↗
10. 10.19927/j.cnki.syyt.2022.08.03210.19927/j.cnki.syyt.2022.08.032 ↗
11. 10.1109/jsen.2017.271957910.1109/jsen.2017.2719579 ↗
12. 10.1784/insi.2006.48.12.72410.1784/insi.2006.48.12.724 ↗
13. 10.1108/0260228101101077210.1108/02602281011010772 ↗
14. 10.1109/jsen.2015.244698210.1109/jsen.2015.2446982 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2022.10273810.1016/j.ndteint.2022.102738 ↗
16. 10.1109/tim.2021.308690310.1109/tim.2021.3086903 ↗
17. 10.1109/tim.2022.318043810.1109/tim.2022.3180438 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.10258810.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102588 ↗
19. 10.1088/0957-0233/11/6/31810.1088/0957-0233/11/6/318 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10470-017-0970-y10.1007/s10470-017-0970-y ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jocs.2021.10150710.1016/j.jocs.2021.101507 ↗
22. 10.1109/JSEN.2018.284454910.1109/JSEN.2018.2844549 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10845510.1016/j.measurement.2020.108455 ↗
24. 10.1109/jsen.2017.266486410.1109/jsen.2017.2664864 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00339-023-06644-810.1007/s00339-023-06644-8 ↗
26. 10.1002/jnm.256810.1002/jnm.2568 ↗
27. 10.16854/j.cnki.1000-0712.20054510.16854/j.cnki.1000-0712.200545 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.10898510.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.108985 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.11083110.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110831 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.03.00710.1016/j.sigpro.2015.03.007 ↗
31. 10.1109/msp.2014.232913110.1109/msp.2014.2329131 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2023.10930310.1016/j.sigpro.2023.109303 ↗
33. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3695.2012.05.09210.3969/j.issn.1001-3695.2012.05.092 ↗