Automatic detection of microcracks on the surface of special steel wire based on remanence effect
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, a remanence detection technology and double-layer sensor crack depth quantitative method for the on-line detection of microcracks on the surface of steel wire using remanence were developed. First, an instrument and a verification experiment were designed. Second, the magnetic signal of the prefabricated crack was analysed, and a defect recognition algorithm was designed. Finally, a detection instrument was applied in the industrial field. The results indicate that the practical application of remanence detection technology is feasible, the recognition algorithm is accurate and reliable, and a minimum crack depth of 0.078 mm can be detected. The magnetic anomaly amplitude difference of the double-layer sensor is positively correlated with the crack depth. The maximum error rate of the quantitative formula for the depth obtained by the fitting method is 10.95%. However, distinguishing the tilt direction of the crack from the shape of the notch remains a challenge for remanence detection technology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Nondestructive Testing, Ministry of Education, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, PR China
Shanghai Space Propulsion Technology Research Institute, Machining and partial assembly workshop, Shanghai, PR China
Suzhou Jiangnan Aerospace Electromechanical Industry Co, Ltd, R&D Center, Suzhou, PR China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/03019233.2020.184830210.1080/03019233.2020.1848302 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.01.03410.1016/j.commatsci.2011.01.034 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.008 ↗
4. 10.1016/0043-1648(89)90036-710.1016/0043-1648(89)90036-7 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.11.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2013.11.005 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.02.00310.1016/j.apacoust.2017.02.003 ↗
7. Huang H · Iron & Steel Technology Conference (AISTech 2004) · 2004 · 2 · 717
8. 10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.57.3_60110.2355/tetsutohagane1955.57.3_601 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.07.01710.1016/j.ndteint.2017.07.017 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.sna.2019.11164210.1016/j.sna.2019.111642 ↗
11. Zhang D · NDT & E International. · 2021 · 119 · 102405-1–102405
12. 10.1063/1.191671910.1063/1.1916719 ↗
13. Smith CH · 2004 · 406
14. 10.31274/rtd-180813-1526110.31274/rtd-180813-15261 ↗
15. Lu M · IEEE Trans Instrum Meas · 2020 · 70 · 6003509-1–60035
16. Yin W · Sensors · 2021 · 21 · 110.1109/JSEN.2021.3109763 ↗
17. 10.1109/TIM.2015.247910610.1109/TIM.2015.2479106 ↗
18. 10.3390/s2102041910.3390/s21020419 ↗
19. Lanci L · Geophys J Int · 2010 · 181 · 1362
20. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.300721610.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007216 ↗
21. 10.1109/TMAG.2017.268832610.1109/TMAG.2017.2688326 ↗
22. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.296603210.1109/ACCESS.2020.2966032 ↗