Machine learning-driven detection of anomalies in manufactured parts from resonance frequency signatures
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aims to enhance the detection and characterisation of anomalies in manufactured parts by integrating machine learning (ML) with resonance frequency spectra data. A key contribution of this work is the development of a novel Impulse Excitation Technique (IET)-based method that effectively evaluates material health and identifies subtle defects by leveraging numerous mathematical and physical metrics as input features. Three machine learning models – Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) – were systematically compared to determine the most effective method for classifying defects, specifically focusing on healthy, cracked, and dimensionally deviated samples. Among these, the MLP model demonstrated the highest performance, achieving Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) values of 0.963, 0.901, and 0.942 for each class, respectively. Additionally, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis showed anomalies were sensitive to specific resonance frequency metrics, improving prediction accuracy. Cracked samples exhibited slight peak broadening and negative peak shifts, while dimensionally deviated samples showed positive and negative shifts and missing peaks. Dimensional deviations were more pronounced than cracks, making them easier to identify and enhancing predictive accuracy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Henan University of Technology
Erbil Polytechnic University
The Islamic University
The Islamic University of Al Diwaniyah
The Islamic University of Babylon
Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology (IROST)
Sharif University of Technology
Funding
Henan Key Laboratory of Superhard Abrasives and Grinding Equipment, Henan University of Technology · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.10582910.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105829 ↗
2. 10.1177/0021998323122545110.1177/00219983231225451 ↗
3. 10.1088/1402-4896/ad4ea510.1088/1402-4896/ad4ea5 ↗
4. 10.1080/17455030.2023.216938710.1080/17455030.2023.2169387 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.03.06410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.03.064 ↗
6. 10.3390/s2321888410.3390/s23218884 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10288810.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102888 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.10.07610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.10.076 ↗
9. 10.1080/00150193.2023.220178010.1080/00150193.2023.2201780 ↗
10. 10.1063/5.023108710.1063/5.0231087 ↗
11. Weaver G. Nondestructive testing using the resonance acoustic method. Quality. 2022;61(12):12.
12. 10.31399/asm.hb.v24A.a000695310.31399/asm.hb.v24A.a0006953 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000410810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004108 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10921-023-01003-210.1007/s10921-023-01003-2 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11360710.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113607 ↗
16. 10.3390/app1407302310.3390/app14073023 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11572310.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115723 ↗
18. 10.19206/CE-13387210.19206/CE-133872 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2023.10378210.1016/j.tafmec.2023.103782 ↗
20. 10.1007/s40194-022-01419-w10.1007/s40194-022-01419-w ↗
21. 10.1002/eng2.1279210.1002/eng2.12792 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.01110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.011 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.10995010.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109950 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41598-023-33046-w10.1038/s41598-023-33046-w ↗
25. 10.3390/ma1313288610.3390/ma13132886 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10628310.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106283 ↗
27. 10.3390/ma1415427010.3390/ma14154270 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.10525010.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105250 ↗
29. 10.1115/1.405631210.1115/1.4056312 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.10794810.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107948 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10921-023-01035-810.1007/s10921-023-01035-8 ↗
32. 10.1007/s40194-020-01034-710.1007/s40194-020-01034-7 ↗
33. 10.1007/s12206-024-0329-010.1007/s12206-024-0329-0 ↗
34. 10.3390/app1215764810.3390/app12157648 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.10559710.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105597 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41598-023-31461-710.1038/s41598-023-31461-7 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10667410.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106674 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3368110.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33681 ↗
39. 10.1007/s41062-021-00679-710.1007/s41062-021-00679-7 ↗
40. 10.3389/fenvs.2024.129132710.3389/fenvs.2024.1291327 ↗
41. 10.1109/CANDO-EPE60507.2023.1041801410.1109/CANDO-EPE60507.2023.10418014 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11038910.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110389 ↗
43. 10.1007/s13202-021-01087-410.1007/s13202-021-01087-4 ↗
44. 10.1007/s10489-021-02524-x10.1007/s10489-021-02524-x ↗
45. 10.3390/ma1615520710.3390/ma16155207 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.10201510.1016/j.rineng.2024.102015 ↗
47. 10.1109/TR.2022.319471010.1109/TR.2022.3194710 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.10733810.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107338 ↗
49. 10.1109/TUFFC.2021.308175010.1109/TUFFC.2021.3081750 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2021.10377410.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2021.103774 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.11067410.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110674 ↗
52. 10.1177/1475921722110988210.1177/14759217221109882 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.11011210.1016/j.measurement.2021.110112 ↗
54. 10.1109/TIM.2021.305732510.1109/TIM.2021.3057325 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.10249510.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102495 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10626110.1016/j.ultras.2020.106261 ↗