journal article·2025-06-03

Imaging method of surface defect using leaky Rayleigh wave with ultrasonic phased array

Zhiping Liu, Zelong Li, Duo Lyu, Zhiwu Zhang, Hongwei Hu

Publisher page

Abstract

Leaky Rayleigh wave testing has the advantages of non-contact, high sensitivity, and good beam directivity. However, current leaky Rayleigh wave testing mostly uses monolithic transducers and is seriously affected by acoustic wave attenuation and diffusion, resulting in poor image quality, limited detection range and low imaging efficiency. In this paper, a novel leaky Rayleigh wave testing method using an ultrasonic phased array is developed, and the total focusing method (TFM) is used to achieve high-quality imaging of defects. To improve imaging efficiency, the root-mean-square velocity (RMSV) model is utilised to rapidly acquire an approximate analytical solution for the time of flight of the acoustic wave. To obtain more accurate defect images further, the amplitude of the total focusing imaging signal is calibrated. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves a 48% improvement in the imaging accuracy of a 1 mm hole, compared to the traditional Synthetic Aperture Focusing Technique (SAFT) imaging method. The proposed method achieves an 92% reduction in imaging time compared to the conventional TFM. The proposed method provides a new non-contact approach for high-accuracy and high-efficiency defect imaging using leaky Rayleigh wave.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Flow Measurement and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Changsha University of Science and Technology

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province · Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Intelligent Manufacturing Technology for High-performance Mechanical Equipment

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/10589759.2023.223455410.1080/10589759.2023.2234554 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.10724610.1016/j.measurement.2019.107246 ↗
3. 10.1080/10589759.2024.232437310.1080/10589759.2024.2324373 ↗
4. 10.1080/10589759.2023.228706710.1080/10589759.2023.2287067 ↗
5. 10.1080/10589759.2020.176455310.1080/10589759.2020.1764553 ↗
6. 10.1016/0041-624X(92)90084-Y10.1016/0041-624X(92)90084-Y ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ultras.2019.04.00610.1016/j.ultras.2019.04.006 ↗
8. 10.3938/jkps.74.45910.3938/jkps.74.459 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10870810.1016/j.measurement.2020.108708 ↗
10. 10.1080/10589759.2019.168448910.1080/10589759.2019.1684489 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ultras.2019.10596510.1016/j.ultras.2019.105965 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ultras.2015.08.00810.1016/j.ultras.2015.08.008 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.07.07310.1016/j.measurement.2019.07.073 ↗
14. 10.1784/insi.2014.56.2.7510.1784/insi.2014.56.2.75 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.002 ↗
16. 10.1784/insi.2019.61.7.36710.1784/insi.2019.61.7.367 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.35292210.1063/1.352922 ↗
18. 10.1121/10.000897810.1121/10.0008978 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2022.10275410.1016/j.ndteint.2022.102754 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.06.00210.1016/j.ultras.2006.06.002 ↗
21. 10.1784/insi.2012.54.7.38010.1784/insi.2012.54.7.380 ↗
22. 10.1007/s40328-020-00329-x10.1007/s40328-020-00329-x ↗
23. 10.1007/s10921-013-0198-410.1007/s10921-013-0198-4 ↗
24. 10.1190/1.144005810.1190/1.1440058 ↗
25. 10.1121/1.181027110.1121/1.1810271 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.09.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2009.09.001 ↗
27. 10.1007/978-3-319-30463-210.1007/978-3-319-30463-2 ↗
28. 10.1134/S106183092260111810.1134/S1061830922601118 ↗