journal article·2024-08-17

Non-destructive triaxial vibroacoustic modal testing with a single sound transducer: a railway sleeper case study

Ferhat Çeçen, Bekir Aktaş, Ahmet Özbayrak

Publisher page

Abstract

Vibrational experimental modal analysis (EMA) is among the most widely used modal parameter estimation techniques. However, it has several drawbacks, such as requiring accelerometer(s) mounting and using local measurements. Therefore, this study investigated whether vibroacoustic modal testing (VMT), a rarely studied method, would be a suitable alternative for EMA. In this context, a comparative case study was conducted on railway sleepers. First, modal parameter determination techniques in the literature were compared (time/frequency-domain, with/without normalisation, structural/acoustic excitation, and acoustic/vibrational response). Then, VMT and EMA test setups were reorganised considering the deficiencies identified in the literature. As a result, the difference between the VMT and EMA resonance frequency and damping ratios in the proposed mode shapes is determined as 0.06% and 3.46%, respectively. Consequently, this novel VMT setup using a single microphone that can take non-destructive, non-contact, and non-local (triaxial) measurements has been proven to provide reliable results and is recommended for future studies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Railway Engineering and Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Track Maintenance Department, Turkish State Railways, Sivas, Turkey

Civil Engineering Department, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey

Funding

Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri, Erciyes Üniversitesi

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Bree HED 2009. The microflown ebook chapter-2: sound & vibration. Available from https://www.microflown.com/assets/uploads/Publications/ebook_2_sound_and_vibration.pdf
2. 10.1080/10589759.2023.217375110.1080/10589759.2023.2173751 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.10495110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.104951 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.10582110.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105821 ↗
5. Siemens 2019. What is the acoustic quantity called Q? Available from https://community.sw.siemens.com/s/article/what-is-the-acoustic-quantity-called-q
6. Gidrao GMS, Krahl PA, Carrazedo R. Characterization of concrete internal damping, in 3° Encontro Luso-Brasileiro de Degradação em Estruturas de Concreto Armado São Carlos. Brasil: São Paulo; 2018.
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.01010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.010 ↗
8. 10.1177/107754631452250710.1177/1077546314522507 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12615110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126151 ↗
10. 10.5545/sv-jme.2012.56910.5545/sv-jme.2012.569 ↗
11. 10.5772/intechopen.8271110.5772/intechopen.82711 ↗
12. Proximity effect (audio) Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proximity_effect_(audio)
13. 10.1007/s10921-019-0584-710.1007/s10921-019-0584-7 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.02.00410.1016/j.jsv.2014.02.004 ↗
15. Guimaraes GP, Pirk R, Souto CD, et al., 2011. Acoustic modal analysis of Cylindrical-type Cavities, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2011, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 3160–3167
16. 10.1007/978-3-319-15236-3_410.1007/978-3-319-15236-3_4 ↗
17. Gjelstrup SL 2021. What is Modal Analysis: the ultimate Guide. Available from https://dewesoft.com/daq/what-is-modal-analysis#sdof-fitting
18. Simith GM 2022. Sound and noise measurement with microphone transducers. Available from https://dewesoft.com/daq/sound-measurement-with-microphone-sensors.
19. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.10547110.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105471 ↗