Development of compact smart bearing and novel hybrid feature assessment for weak defect identification
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, a compact smart bearing with self-sensing and condition monitoring function is proposed. A traditional bearing embedded in a piezoelectric transducer ring with a segmented electrode design is prototyped and tested under different working conditions. Its compact design ensures compatibility for integration with different systems. The segmented electrodes enable possible multidirectional data acquisition and piezoelectric energy generation, suggesting potential integration with Internet of Things (IoT) platforms. Utilizing the high sensitivity, fast response and high signal resolution of the piezoelectric material in conjunction with a novel design that enables close contact between the piezoelectric transducer and the bearing, the smart bearing demonstrates effective performance in detecting weak bearing defects signals. A novel feature characterising method is proposed, and a hybridised feature selection method is employed for reducing the dimension of feature subsets and ensuring defect identification accuracy. A classification model for the identification of defects is developed based on a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network. The performance of the smart bearing and the method for identifying the defects are evaluated through experiments to demonstrate the potential for practical applications. A preliminary experiment for energy harvesting using the smart bearing has been conducted, and it proves the potential to sustain power.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis · Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Guangdong University of Technology
University of Manitoba
Jiangsu Normal University
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/1-84628-269-1_710.1007/1-84628-269-1_7 ↗
2. 10.1177/147592171770462610.1177/1475921717704626 ↗
3. 10.1080/10589759.2010.52182510.1080/10589759.2010.521825 ↗
4. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/1/01200210.1088/0964-1726/20/1/012002 ↗
5. Alzghoul A, Jarndal A, Alsyouf I, et al. On the usefulness of pre-processing methods in rotating machines faults classification using artificial neural network. J Appl Comput Mech. 2021;7(1):254–261.
6. 10.1080/10589759.2015.104645210.1080/10589759.2015.1046452 ↗
7. 10.1080/10589759.2020.178544710.1080/10589759.2020.1785447 ↗
8. 10.1117/12.27568310.1117/12.275683 ↗
9. 10.1177/1045389X2092482910.1177/1045389X20924829 ↗
10. 10.1080/15376494.2018.150879510.1080/15376494.2018.1508795 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.energy.2021.12177010.1016/j.energy.2021.121770 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10427710.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104277 ↗
13. 10.3390/polym1504082610.3390/polym15040826 ↗
14. 10.1155/2016/813927310.1155/2016/8139273 ↗
15. 10.36001/ijphm.2016.v7i2.236510.36001/ijphm.2016.v7i2.2365 ↗
16. 10.1007/s42835-019-00096-y10.1007/s42835-019-00096-y ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10998710.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109987 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.05.03310.1016/j.ymssp.2014.05.033 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.10.02810.1016/j.apacoust.2015.10.028 ↗
20. 10.1080/10589759.2024.237556710.1080/10589759.2024.2375567 ↗
21. 10.3390/s2007188410.3390/s20071884 ↗
22. 10.1109/TIA.2021.309195810.1109/TIA.2021.3091958 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41598-022-08956-w10.1038/s41598-022-08956-w ↗
24. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11240810.1016/j.measurement.2022.112408 ↗
25. 10.1080/10589759.2022.211874710.1080/10589759.2022.2118747 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11071-023-08405-x10.1007/s11071-023-08405-x ↗
27. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10751810.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107518 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.10485210.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.104852 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.10887010.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108870 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00170-022-10792-110.1007/s00170-022-10792-1 ↗
31. 10.3390/s2314650810.3390/s23146508 ↗
32. 10.3390/machines1105053110.3390/machines11050531 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ast.2023.10822610.1016/j.ast.2023.108226 ↗
34. 10.1080/10589759.2023.224958110.1080/10589759.2023.2249581 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.asej.2022.10194510.1016/j.asej.2022.101945 ↗
36. 10.1080/10589759.2024.232763910.1080/10589759.2024.2327639 ↗
37. 10.1080/10589759.2020.184365210.1080/10589759.2020.1843652 ↗
38. 10.1177/1077546322109564910.1177/10775463221095649 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10758710.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107587 ↗
40. 10.1177/1475921721107395010.1177/14759217211073950 ↗
41. 10.1080/10589759.2022.209437810.1080/10589759.2022.2094378 ↗
42. 10.1080/10589759.2023.229431810.1080/10589759.2023.2294318 ↗
43. 10.1088/1361-665x/ac6d3010.1088/1361-665x/ac6d30 ↗
44. 10.1016/0167-2789(93)90009-P10.1016/0167-2789(93)90009-P ↗
45. 10.1109/78.53667210.1109/78.536672 ↗
46. 10.1177/1475921721106810710.1177/14759217211068107 ↗
47. He X, Cai D, Niyogi P. Laplacian score for feature selection. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; December 5-8, 2005; Vancouver British Columbia Canada. 2005. p. 507–514.
48. 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.173510.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
49. 10.1007/978-981-15-6759-9_410.1007/978-981-15-6759-9_4 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.10815510.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108155 ↗
51. 10.1080/10589759.2024.238046210.1080/10589759.2024.2380462 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.11081310.1016/j.chaos.2021.110813 ↗
53. 10.1007/s11071-023-08248-610.1007/s11071-023-08248-6 ↗
54. 10.1088/1361-665X/acbcb110.1088/1361-665X/acbcb1 ↗