journal article·2025-03-04

Creep strain prediction in power plant material via ANN modelling of nonlinear ultrasonic test results

M. Sahu, A. Ghosh, C. Dutta, J. Kumar, S. Palit Sagar

Publisher page

Abstract

Reliable and accurate prediction of the creep life of power plant components is crucial for both economic and safety reasons. Existing prediction models, based on creep test data, can be complex and time-consuming. Nonlinear ultrasonic (NLU) is a widely-accepted non-destructive testing (NDT) technique for evaluating damage progression in crept specimens. The information from NLU measurements alone is insufficient to forecast the life of any component. In real-time applications, intelligent NDT protocols are needed to enable fast and accurate life prediction of such components. A methodology for creep life prediction using artificial neural networks (ANN) has been introduced based on NLU test results of crept P92 steel specimens. The technique involved creep tests of P92 specimens exposed to a temperature of 625⁰C with applied stress ranging from 120MPa to 160MPa, NLU measurements at each step load, and prediction of creep life of the material with a ANN trained with creep strain and NLU test data. The technique involves prediction from previously generated historical data, thus saving both cost and time of conducting continuous experiments. This approach for ANN modeling of NLU data can be considered a reliable, time-saving, and effective technique for assessing creep damage progression in power plant components.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Institute of Technology

CSIR National Metallurgical Laboratory

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board, New Delhi, India

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.05010.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.050 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.171176010.1063/1.1711760 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-1-4615-4791-4_22710.1007/978-1-4615-4791-4_227 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0041-624X(97)00040-110.1016/S0041-624X(97)00040-1 ↗
5. 10.1108/ACMM-05-2014-139010.1108/ACMM-05-2014-1390 ↗
6. 10.1098/rspa.2003.118110.1098/rspa.2003.1181 ↗
7. 10.1080/10589759.2022.212348110.1080/10589759.2022.2123481 ↗
8. Prassianakis I N. Experimental approach to damage evaluation using ultrasounds. 1994.
9. 10.3390/s11111079810.3390/s111110798 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00162-110.1016/S0142-1123(01)00162-1 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00063-310.1016/S0963-8695(00)00063-3 ↗
12. 10.31399/asm.tb.dmlahtc.978162708340910.31399/asm.tb.dmlahtc.9781627083409 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.276736410.1115/1.2767364 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.486363910.1063/1.4863639 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11665-021-06272-410.1007/s11665-021-06272-4 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.01110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.011 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11665-023-08113-y10.1007/s11665-023-08113-y ↗
18. 10.1590/S1678-5878200500040000710.1590/S1678-58782005000400007 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.06410.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.064 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10921-004-0822-410.1007/s10921-004-0822-4 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0963-8695(02)00041-510.1016/S0963-8695(02)00041-5 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0020-0255(01)00112-810.1016/S0020-0255(01)00112-8 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10813010.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108130 ↗
24. 10.3390/ma1519652310.3390/ma15196523 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00521-017-2851-910.1007/s00521-017-2851-9 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.07910.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.079 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.01.04310.1016/j.anucene.2014.01.043 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10921-010-0086-010.1007/s10921-010-0086-0 ↗
29. Elmolla ES, Chaudhuri M. The Use of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for modelling, simulation and prediction of advanced oxidation process performance in recalcitrant wastewater treatment. Artificial Neural Networks-Application. UK: Intechopen; 2011.
30. 10.1080/23311916.2019.160917910.1080/23311916.2019.1609179 ↗
31. 10.1088/1742-6596/1378/4/04209410.1088/1742-6596/1378/4/042094 ↗
32. Garson DG. Interpreting neural network connection weights. AI Expert. 1991;6:47–51.
33. 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00579-X10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00579-X ↗