journal article·2022-03-04

ECT simulation and measurements in ferromagnetic tube using DC homogeneous magnetic field

Athanasios Kyrgiazoglou, Theodoros Theodoulidis, Nikolaos Poulakis

Publisher page

Abstract

The application of Eddy Current Testing (ECT) to ferromagnetic materials is challenging owing to the difficulties stemming to ferromagnetism. Due to the non-linear magnetic permeability, the use of a strong external DC magnetic field is often necessary in order to bring ferromagnetic materials close to magnetic saturation where permeability is minimised; strongly improving eddy current’s penetration in the material volume. In this work, the main application studied is ECT on a ferromagnetic tube with an Inside Diameter (ID) coil. The effect of different levels of the DC magnetic field on the coil impedance changes is investigated both experimentally and by simulation. It is shown that DC field has a systematic influence both to magnitude and phase of the Eddy Current signal. In addition, for the different defect depths, a critical level is observed, where the signals from discontinuities become visible and stand out from the noise of non-linearity. Moreover, for a range of magnetisation field level, the changes of phase angle are distinct for different defects’ depths allowing thus the application of phase analysis for defect characterisation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, Kozani, Greece

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, Kozani, Greece

Funding

State Scholarships Foundation

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.08.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2009.08.005 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.12.01310.1016/j.ndteint.2013.12.013 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.34522710.1063/1.345227 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.06.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2009.06.007 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.03.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2019.03.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.03.05410.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.03.054 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.01.00610.1016/j.matlet.2004.01.006 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.01.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2010.01.005 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.08.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2006.08.002 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.sna.2017.04.03810.1016/j.sna.2017.04.038 ↗
11. Goldberg L · Mat Eval · 1998 · 56 · 149
12. Cecco VS · Mat Eval · 1993 · 51 · 572
13. Theodoulidis T · 2006
14. Theodoulidis T · 2000 · 357
15. IAEA. Eddy current testing at level 2: manual for the syllabi contained in IAEA-TECDOC-628.Rev.2 “Training guidelines for non destructive testing techniques”. Viena; 2011.
16. Cecco VS · 1983
17. Kyrgiazoglou A · 2018
18. 10.1016/0304-8853(92)91115-A10.1016/0304-8853(92)91115-A ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2015.05.00910.1016/j.ijpvp.2015.05.009 ↗
20. Tumanski S · 2011
21. Fujiwara H · Non-Destr Test · 1992 · 1 · 273
22. 10.1063/1.33770010.1063/1.337700 ↗
23. 10.1109/20.33417210.1109/20.334172 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.11.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2005.11.004 ↗
25. 10.1109/20.10294110.1109/20.102941 ↗
26. Kyrgiazoglou A · 2017
27. 10.1007/s10921-017-0447-z10.1007/s10921-017-0447-z ↗