Electromagnetic (EM) sensor measurement for residual stress characterisation in welded steel plates
Source abstract
Abstract
Residual stresses can cause compromise in structural integrity; it is desirable to assess residual stresses using non-destructive testing so that effects on structural properties can be predicted. Electromagnetic (EM) sensors can be used to characterise residual stresses in steels accounting for, microstructure and geometry effects. Residual stress characterisation in welded EN S275 steel plates using EM sensors is reported. Low-frequency, low-magnetic field EM sensors were used to assess residual stresses in the plates. A finite element model for the sensor and sample was generated in COMSOL software so the influence of weld bead geometry and microstructure could be predicted and accounted for. This allowed residual stresses to be determined from EM sensor measurements, excluding the geometry and microstructure effects, XRD was used to verify EM sensor measurements. The highest residual stresses were found adjacent to the weld fusion zone, with magnitudes of, 170±5MPa, 120±20MPa and 42±10MPa for X-ray diffraction (XRD), a small EM sensor (U-12.7) and a big EM sensor (U-31) types, respectively. The differences are due to the volume of the material measured by each measurement type. It was shown that EM sensors are capable of measuring residual stress in welded plates to a good level of accuracy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
Tata Steel UK Ltd, Research and Development, University of Warwick Science Park, Coventry, CV4 7EZ, UK
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Tata Steel UK
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1179/02670830110151008710.1179/026708301101510087 ↗
2. 10.1080/1058975080224528010.1080/10589750802245280 ↗
3. Jin M, Nam H, Jang DY, et al. Residual stress measurement on welded specimen by neutron diffraction. J Mater Process Technol. 2004;156:1171–1177.
4. 10.1063/1.240104810.1063/1.2401048 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.499420210.1063/1.4994202 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.06.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2017.06.001 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.21310.1016/j.procir.2018.03.213 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2017.04.00610.1016/j.ijpvp.2017.04.006 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.12.03310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.12.033 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.12.03410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.12.034 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.04.03110.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.04.031 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.00410.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.004 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.00610.1016/j.dental.2005.03.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.10471510.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104715 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.12.04710.1016/j.measurement.2014.12.047 ↗
17. 10.1007/s12540-020-00921-410.1007/s12540-020-00921-4 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12834710.1016/j.matlet.2020.128347 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.05410.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.054 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2011.11.00710.1016/j.tafmec.2011.11.007 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.08.02210.1016/j.matdes.2011.08.022 ↗
22. 10.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.00109-610.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.00109-6 ↗
23. 10.1109/SUPERGEN.2009.534801710.1109/SUPERGEN.2009.5348017 ↗
24. 10.1109/ICMAE.2016.754954610.1109/ICMAE.2016.7549546 ↗
25. 10.3390/met808059210.3390/met8080592 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.499420210.1063/1.4994202 ↗
27. 10.1109/CLEOPR.2009.529270510.1109/CLEOPR.2009.5292705 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.03.00110.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.03.001 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.09.01110.1016/j.ndteint.2014.09.011 ↗
30. 10.1109/ICEMI.2009.527462310.1109/ICEMI.2009.5274623 ↗
31. 10.1109/TMAG.2002.80229910.1109/TMAG.2002.802299 ↗
32. 10.1109/ICMA.2011.598582010.1109/ICMA.2011.5985820 ↗
33. 10.1109/ICMA.2014.688573310.1109/ICMA.2014.6885733 ↗
34. 10.1109/FENDT.2016.799200210.1109/FENDT.2016.7992002 ↗
35. 10.1109/IWC.2016.806836410.1109/IWC.2016.8068364 ↗
36. 10.1109/FENDT.2015.739832810.1109/FENDT.2015.7398328 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.10.00710.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.10.007 ↗
38. 10.1179/02670830110150998010.1179/026708301101509980 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.36088010.1063/1.360880 ↗
40. 10.1016/0029-1021(76)90239-510.1016/0029-1021(76)90239-5 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0963-8695(97)00023-610.1016/S0963-8695(97)00023-6 ↗
42. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.490-491.16510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.490-491.165 ↗
43. 10.1109/FENDT.2013.663553810.1109/FENDT.2013.6635538 ↗
44. 10.1243/030932498151300210.1243/0309324981513002 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.16550410.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165504 ↗
46. 10.1109/20.5401510.1109/20.54015 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.01.05710.1016/j.jmmm.2014.01.057 ↗
48. 10.1533/9780857099136.23810.1533/9780857099136.238 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.10.09910.1016/j.jmmm.2018.10.099 ↗
50. 10.3390/met911123310.3390/met9111233 ↗
51. Zhou L et al. “Non-destructive monitoring of phase fraction and tensile properties of dual-phase steels by an electro-magnetic sensor ” Proc 6th Eur Roll Conf. 2013; [Online]. Available: http://221.0.90.144
52. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.11.03210.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.11.032 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.08.04810.1016/j.jmmm.2011.08.048 ↗
54. 10.1109/TMAG.2014.235784010.1109/TMAG.2014.2357840 ↗
55. 10.1109/TIE.2016.258992010.1109/TIE.2016.2589920 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.03410.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.034 ↗
57. Farajian M, Nitschke-Pagel T, Dilger K. Relaxation of welding residual stresses - part I: under quasi-static loading. Int J Microstruct Mater Prop. 2012;7(1):3–15.