Fatigue crack detection and fatigue damage imaging using the non-collinear transverse wave mixing technique
Source abstract
Abstract
For the fatigue crack embedded in metallic components, the non-collinear transverse wave mixing technique is applied to detect them and image the fatigue damage around crack. When two non-collinear transverse waves with same frequency meet in components, a resonance longitudinal wave can be generated if the resonance condition is satisfied; the mixing nonlinear parameter is applied to evaluate the nonlinearity of detection positions. The non-collinear wave mixing experiments are conducted on components with different length of fatigue crack. By changing the relative position of transducers, different detection positions can be controlled. According to the distribution of mixing nonlinear parameter at vertical direction, the length of fatigue crack at vertical direction can be measured. Furthermore, the mixing nonlinear parameters of different detection positions around fatigue crack are measured, the image of mixing nonlinear parameter can visualise the damage around fatigue crack which is very easy to assess the fatigue damage of components.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Mechanical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning, China
Institute of Light Industrial and Food Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning, China
Guangxi Liugong Machinery Co., Ltd., Liuzhou, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province · advanced manufacturing technology of Guangxi key laboratory project
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3788/OPE.20111901.013210.3788/OPE.20111901.0132 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61097-210.1016/S1003-6326(11)61097-2 ↗
3. 10.1557/JMR.1999.017610.1557/JMR.1999.0176 ↗
4. 10.1121/1.191840510.1121/1.1918405 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.473974610.1063/1.4739746 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10921-014-0224-110.1007/s10921-014-0224-1 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.12.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2013.12.004 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.359187210.1063/1.3591872 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.09.01110.1016/j.ultras.2013.09.011 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.03.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2012.03.005 ↗
11. Liu S · J Mech Eng · 2012 · 22 · 21
12. Jiao J · Smart Mater Struct · 2017 · 26
13. 10.1063/1.482718010.1063/1.4827180 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.176728310.1063/1.1767283 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.10430110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.104301 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.242689110.1063/1.2426891 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.14430110.1103/PhysRevLett.113.144301 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.12.01010.1016/j.ndteint.2016.12.010 ↗
19. 10.1121/1.323145110.1121/1.3231451 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ultras.2015.09.02110.1016/j.ultras.2015.09.021 ↗
21. Zhang Z · AIP Conf Proc · 1650 · 2015 · 1599
22. Zhang Z · AIP Conf Proc · 1706 · 2016 · 060003