journal article·2025-03-04

Utilizing an enhanced machine learning approach for geopolymer concrete analysis

Diksha, Nirendra Dev, Pradeep Kumar Goyal

Publisher page

Abstract

The flyash-based geopolymer concrete has been extensively utilized to minimize carbon emissions for over 15 years. The compressive strength (CS), split tensile strength (STS), and flexural strength (FS) of concrete determine its mechanical characteristics. Laboratory strength testing and analytical methods is costly and time-consuming, which struggle to predict complicated concrete combination CS, STS, and FS. ML models accurately predict CS, STS, FS. To predict the CS, STS, and FS of GPC concrete, five ML techniques (LR, SVM, GPR, EL, and ANN) were adopted. Taylor diagrams and error graphs adopted to represents model performances. The GPR outperforms other models in CS predictions by having the lowest MAE, RMSE, MAPE, and R-values. GPR continues to outperform in STS predictions, with low MAE, RMSE, and MAPE, as well as high R-values. GPR outperforms FS predictions with low MAE, RMSE, MAPE, and high R-values. SVM is excellent since it has a low MAE and RMSE. SVM, GPR, and ANN optimisations keep them competitive. GPR consistently gets the lowest MAPE values across all three tests, indicating that it is a strong model contender. The created model can forecast the mechanical characteristics of geopolymer concrete with ease and better reproducibility.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Delhi Technological University

Funding

no funding associated

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Shayan A. 2016. Specification of geopolymer concrete: general guide. Available from: https://trid.trb.org/view/1435874
2. Glukhovsky VD. Soil silicates (Gruntosilikaty). USSR Kiev: Budivelnik Publisher; 1959.
3. 10.1007/bf0190444610.1007/bf01904446 ↗
4. Malhotra VM. Introduction: sustainable development and concrete technology. Concr Int. 2002;24(7).
5. Nuruddin FCS. Microstructure of polymeric concrete incorporating fly ash & silica fume. Can J Civ Eng. 2010 February;1(1).
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.04510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.045 ↗
7. 10.1680/asic.34044.001710.1680/asic.34044.0017 ↗
8. 10.1080/10589759.2024.230425710.1080/10589759.2024.2304257 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.dibe.2023.10029810.1016/j.dibe.2023.100298 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.21910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.219 ↗
11. 10.3390/ma1206098310.3390/ma12060983 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12425110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124251 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.06.00810.1016/j.jmrt.2020.06.008 ↗
14. 10.3390/app1021772610.3390/app10217726 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11858110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118581 ↗
16. 10.1002/suco.20210035410.1002/suco.202100354 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12378510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123785 ↗
18. 10.1007/s41062-021-00506-z10.1007/s41062-021-00506-z ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10386310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103863 ↗
20. 10.1155/2021/661840710.1155/2021/6618407 ↗
21. 10.3390/ma1407172910.3390/ma14071729 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12578510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125785 ↗
23. 10.1002/suco.20220034410.1002/suco.202200344 ↗
24. Davidovits J 30 years of successes and failures in geopolymer applications. In: Proceedings of the Geopolymer 2002 Conference, Melbourne, Australia; 2002 October 28–29.
25. 10.1007/s13369-014-1093-810.1007/s13369-014-1093-8 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.33610.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.336 ↗
27. Memon FA, Nuruddin MF, Demie S, et al. Effect of superplasticizer and extra water on workability and compressive strength of self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2012;4(5):407–414.
28. 10.1080/19397038.2021.197027510.1080/19397038.2021.1970275 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.05.00910.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.05.009 ↗
30. Davidovits J (2002) 30 years of successes and failures in geopolymer applications. In: Proceedings of the Geopolymer 2002 Conference; 28–29 October, Melbourne, Australia.
31. 10.1007/s41939-023-00148-x10.1007/s41939-023-00148-x ↗
32. 10.1007/s40996-023-01308-210.1007/s40996-023-01308-2 ↗
33. 10.1155/2014/38154910.1155/2014/381549 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.10323310.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103233 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.est.2022.10451210.1016/j.est.2022.104512 ↗
36. 10.1002/widm.124910.1002/widm.1249 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10596210.1016/j.istruc.2024.105962 ↗