journal article·2020-07-02

A low-cost geometry calibration procedure for a modular cone-beam X-ray CT system

V. Nguyen, J. De Beenhouwer, J. G. Sanctorum, S. Van Wassenbergh, S. Bazrafkan, J. J. J. Dirckx, J. Sijbers

Publisher page

Abstract

Accurate knowledge of the acquisition geometry of a CT scanning system is key for high quality tomographic imaging. Unfortunately, in modular X-ray CT setups, geometry misalignment occurs each time the setup is changed, which calls for an efficient calibration procedure to correct for geometric inaccuracies. Although many studies have been dealing with the calibration of X-ray CT systems, these are often specifically designed for one setup and/or expensive.In this work, we explore the possibilities of a low-cost, easy-to-build, and modular phantom, constructed from LEGO bricks, which serves as a structure to hold small metal beads, for geometric calibration of a tomographic X-ray system. By estimating the bead coordinates using deep learning, and minimizing center-to-center distances of the metal beads between measured and reference projection data, geometry parameters are derived. With simulated as well as real experiments, it is shown that the LEGO phantom can be used to accurately estimate the geometry of a modular X-ray CT system.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Imec - Vision Lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium

Biophysics and BioMedical Physics (BIMEF) Lab, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

Functional Morphology Lab, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

Funding

University Research Fund, UAntwerp BOF-GOA 2016 · EC INTERREG Vlaanderen-Nederland · Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO) SBO project MetroFlex

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.11.02710.1016/j.jsb.2011.11.027 ↗
2. 10.1118/1.360909610.1118/1.3609096 ↗
3. 10.1152/ajplegacy.1975.229.3.74610.1152/ajplegacy.1975.229.3.746 ↗
4. Wang CC · Sci Rep · 2017 · 7 · 110.1038/s41598-016-0028-x ↗
5. Liu Y Improve Industrial Cone-Beam Computed Tomography by Integrating Prior Information [dissertation]. ETH Zurich; 2001.
6. 10.1118/1.186965210.1118/1.1869652 ↗
7. 10.1118/1.358913010.1118/1.3589130 ↗
8. 10.1088/0031-9155/54/6/01610.1088/0031-9155/54/6/016 ↗
9. 10.1118/1.473924710.1118/1.4739247 ↗
10. 10.1364/AO.37.00340810.1364/AO.37.003408 ↗
11. 10.6028/jres.113.02710.6028/jres.113.027 ↗
12. 10.1055/s-0040-172163010.1055/s-0040-1721630 ↗
13. Brainerd EL · J Exp Zool Part A Ecol Genetics Physiol · 2010 · 313 · 26210.1002/jez.589 ↗
14. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.9010.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
15. Marinovszki A · 2018
16. 10.1023/A:100867742736110.1023/A:1008677427361 ↗
17. Ferrucci M Systematic approach to geometrical calibration of X-ray computed tomography instruments [dissertation]; 2018. Available from: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/521553.
18. Mahesh M · Radio Graphics · 2004 · 24 · 1747
19. 10.1088/1361-6501/ab23e710.1088/1361-6501/ab23e7 ↗
20. 10.1242/jeb.14538310.1242/jeb.145383 ↗
21. 10.1364/OE.24.02512910.1364/OE.24.025129 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.05.00210.1016/j.ultramic.2015.05.002 ↗
23. Nguyen V · 2019 · 1