journal article·2024-11-16

Measuring thermal and electrical performances of additively manufactured magnetic shielding material: an active thermography approach

Luca Santoro, Michele Quercio, Aldo Canova, Raffaella Sesana

Publisher page

Abstract

The thermal and electrical responses of additive manufactured specimens were analysed for a additive manufactured steel magnetic shield as a case study. The analysis was based on the evidence that variations in the thermal properties of a material can be measured as a phase delay in thermal diffusion through the material bulk. The signal post-processing was performed, and the results were presented in a phase diagram. The results showed that after heat treatment, the slope of the phase diagram changed to less steep, indicating an increase in thermal diffusivity and hence thermal conductivity. The electrical conductivity was predicted using the thermal conductivity and the Weidemann-Franz law and validated by experimental measurements of the electrical conductivity. The same approach was applied to predict the electrical conductivity in the magnetic shielding, taking into consideration the scaling of the density due to porosity. The results showed that the thermographic non-destructive full field non-contact approach can be used to evaluate the electrical properties of a component and that the heat-treated specimens show better thermal diffusivity and hence thermal and electrical conductivity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy

Energy Department, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.00110.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 ↗
2. Wang H, Feng W, Liu D, et al. Iron-based soft magnetic materials fabricated by laser additive manufacturing. Eng Sci. 2023;22:809.
3. 10.1007/s42114-023-00687-410.1007/s42114-023-00687-4 ↗
4. 10.1007/s42114-023-00672-x10.1007/s42114-023-00672-x ↗
5. Wang X, Liu Z, Wang H, et al. Direct 3d printing of piezoelectrets: process feasibility, prototypes fabrication and device performance. Eng Sci. 2022;21:800.
6. Manoj A, Ch R. Biodegradable filament for 3d printing process: A review. Eng Sci. 2022;18:11–19.
7. Wang X, Liu Z, Wang H, et al. An electro-mechanical coupled model for 3d printed piezoelectrets: development, validation, and prediction. Eng Sci. 2023;24:899.
8. 10.1007/s42114-023-00698-110.1007/s42114-023-00698-1 ↗
9. 10.1177/095441001456879710.1177/0954410014568797 ↗
10. 10.1115/1.402859910.1115/1.4028599 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.mfglet.2017.12.01110.1016/j.mfglet.2017.12.011 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12767910.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127679 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.01.02810.1016/j.jmrt.2022.01.028 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.01.01610.1016/j.matchar.2018.01.016 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.12.00610.1016/j.matdes.2018.12.006 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11665-021-05919-610.1007/s11665-021-05919-6 ↗
17. 10.1108/RPJ-08-2019-022410.1108/RPJ-08-2019-0224 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.09910.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.03010.1016/j.addma.2019.05.030 ↗
20. 10.1115/1.402854010.1115/1.4028540 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.11387210.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113872 ↗
22. Senck S, Happl M, Reiter M, et al. Additive manufacturing and non-destructive testing of topology-optimised aluminium components. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval. 2020, Jul;35(3):315–327.
23. 10.1080/17452759.2017.135731910.1080/17452759.2017.1357319 ↗
24. 10.1007/s42452-021-04685-310.1007/s42452-021-04685-3 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.02710.1016/j.addma.2018.03.027 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.08.04210.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.08.042 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.12414410.1016/j.seppur.2023.124144 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.12322510.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123225 ↗
29. 10.1007/s42114-022-00487-210.1007/s42114-022-00487-2 ↗
30. 10.1007/s42114-021-00413-y10.1007/s42114-021-00413-y ↗
31. 10.1007/s42114-022-00507-110.1007/s42114-022-00507-1 ↗
32. 10.30919/esee8c54510.30919/esee8c545 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.infrared.2018.12.00610.1016/j.infrared.2018.12.006 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.514497210.1063/1.5144972 ↗
35. 10.3390/jimaging101022010.3390/jimaging1010220 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.infrared.2013.08.00310.1016/j.infrared.2013.08.003 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.infrared.2013.10.00610.1016/j.infrared.2013.10.006 ↗
38. 10.1109/TII.2019.294366910.1109/TII.2019.2943669 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.02.00110.1016/j.marstruc.2017.02.001 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.336242810.1063/1.3362428 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2022.10274810.1016/j.ndteint.2022.102748 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00170-023-11951-810.1007/s00170-023-11951-8 ↗
43. 10.1088/0957-0233/12/12/30710.1088/0957-0233/12/12/307 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.181139010.1063/1.1811390 ↗
45. 10.1007/s10765-014-1755-510.1007/s10765-014-1755-5 ↗
46. 10.1007/s10973-014-4137-010.1007/s10973-014-4137-0 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b0158310.1021/acs.analchem.9b01583 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.epsr.2014.07.00410.1016/j.epsr.2014.07.004 ↗
49. 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181f06c8610.1097/HP.0b013e3181f06c86 ↗
50. 10.1088/2515-7655/ace92f10.1088/2515-7655/ace92f ↗
51. 10.1049/pel2.1258010.1049/pel2.12580 ↗
52. 10.1109/EUROCON56442.2023.1019899510.1109/EUROCON56442.2023.10198995 ↗
53. 10.1109/EUROCON56442.2023.1019895810.1109/EUROCON56442.2023.10198958 ↗
54. 10.1109/OJIA.2022.317697510.1109/OJIA.2022.3176975 ↗
55. 10.1007/s42114-021-00403-010.1007/s42114-021-00403-0 ↗
56. 10.1007/s42114-022-00519-x10.1007/s42114-022-00519-x ↗
57. 10.1007/s42114-022-00438-x10.1007/s42114-022-00438-x ↗
58. 10.1007/s42114-022-00578-010.1007/s42114-022-00578-0 ↗
59. Chang Z, Yuan K, Li J, et al. Anomalous thermal conductivity induced by high dispersive optical phonons in rubidium and cesium halides. ES Energy Environ. 2022;16:30–39.
60. 10.1002/pc.2668410.1002/pc.26684 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10273310.1016/j.addma.2022.102733 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10202010.1016/j.addma.2021.102020 ↗
63. 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.1514710.1103/PhysRevB.53.15147 ↗
64. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/32/32570610.1088/0957-4484/20/32/325706 ↗
65. 10.1063/1.317646710.1063/1.3176467 ↗
66. 10.46338/ijetae0921_0210.46338/ijetae0921_02 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.cja.2020.09.02010.1016/j.cja.2020.09.020 ↗
68. 10.1109/ICEM51905.2022.991068410.1109/ICEM51905.2022.9910684 ↗
69. Bari P, Japigia V Data processing procedures for defects evaluation in composite materials by means of stimulated thermography. In: 19th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing 2016; 2016. p. 1–9. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.
70. 10.1051/e3sconf/2018731301910.1051/e3sconf/20187313019 ↗
71. 10.1088/1361-648X/aaa31e10.1088/1361-648X/aaa31e ↗
72. 10.1002/adem.20160007810.1002/adem.201600078 ↗
73. 10.1109/ITHERM.2016.751766710.1109/ITHERM.2016.7517667 ↗