journal article·2022-09-03Open access

Metal FFF sintering shrinkage rate measurements by X-ray computed tomography

Fabien Léonard, Samuel Tammas-Williams

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication (FFF), also known under the brand name fused deposition modelling, has recently emerged as a more straightforward and economic alternative to established 3D printing or additive manufacturing technologies such as powder bed fusion for metal part manufacturing. In this work, we report on possible approaches to the measurements of FFF sintering shrinkage rates from X-ray computed tomography (XCT) data, with particular focus on those that use greyscale data, and are thus independent of any errors introduced by segmentation. Metallic parts were produced using FFF technology, which relies on an isotropic scaling factor applied to the STL model of the part to be produced to compensate for the shrinkage happening during the sintering of the printed (green) part. We report that for the stainless-steel parts produced, the shrinkage rates were not isotropic and the one along the build direction was the largest, the other two being similar to one another. Overall, the shrinkage rate measured by the different methodologies all fell between 15 % and 16 %. XCT data also clearly showed the typical defects encountered with this technology, such as voids resulting from insufficient overlap or caused by print head blockages, are not mitigated by the sintering process. Autocorrelation was introduced as a way of characterising the 3D structure of the sample before and after sintering, and thus the sintering shrinkage rates.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Injection Molding Process and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The University of Manchester at Harwell, Didcot, UK

School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Prusa research website, original Prusa mini specification webpage [cited 2021 Dec 22]. https://www.prusa3d.com/product/original-prusa-mini-3/.
2. 10.1016/j.jvlc.2015.01.00410.1016/j.jvlc.2015.01.004 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-3-030-56127-710.1007/978-3-030-56127-7 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.14710.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.147 ↗
5. Gong H · MATEC Web Conf · 2018 · 249 01001
6. 10.30880/ijie.2019.11.01.02210.30880/ijie.2019.11.01.022 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11837-018-3207-310.1007/s11837-018-3207-3 ↗
8. 10.1080/10426914.2021.190583010.1080/10426914.2021.1905830 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.02.00810.1016/j.matchar.2015.02.008 ↗
10. British stainless steel association website, melting temperature range for stainless steel specification webpage [cited 2022 Mar 20]. https://bssa.org.uk/bssa_articles/melting-temperature-range-for-stainless-steels/.
11. 10.1002/jmri.115610.1002/jmri.1156 ↗
12. 10.1117/12.59613310.1117/12.596133 ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03349.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03349.x ↗
14. Bernard D, Léonard F, Plougonven E, et al. On the use of autocorrelation functions, permeability tensors, and computed tomography to characterise the anisotropy of diesel particulate filter materials. Philosophical Magazine; 2020.10.1080/14786435.2020.1798532 ↗
15. Tristan Ursell. 2022. autocorr2d [cited 2021 Dec 13] https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/67348-autocorr2d, MATLAB central file exchange.
16. Plougonven E · 2012