Probabilistic analysis of electromagnetic acoustic resonance signals for the detection of pipe wall thinning
Source abstract
Abstract
This study proposes a probability of detection (POD) model for the probabilistic analysis of the detectability of electromagnetic acoustic resonance (EMAR) method for the detection and evaluation of pipe wall thinning. Forty-one carbon steel plate samples with an artificially corroded groove were prepared to simulate pipe wall thinning caused by flow-assisted corrosion. Experiments were performed to gather EMAR signals from the samples, and subsequently the depths of the grooves were evaluated based on the fundamental frequency of the measured signals. The results of the experiments showed that the error in evaluating the depth of a groove tended to increase with the depth. The results also confirmed that the surface roughness of the groove would contribute to the error, and the thickness of a plate without corrosion can be quite accurately evaluated. Analysing the measured EMAR signals using the proposed POD model, which takes these characteristics into consideration, and a conventional one confirmed that the proposed model can more reasonably evaluate the probability of detection against small wall thinning, as well as the false-positive rate.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Quantum Science and Energy Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
Institute of Fluid Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
ELyTMaX UMI 3757, CNRS – Université de Lyon – Tohoku University, International Joint Unit, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
Nuclear Power Department, Tohoku Electric Power Co., Inc, Miyagi, Japan
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.net.2016.01.02010.1016/j.net.2016.01.020 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.35204710.1063/1.352047 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.114432810.1063/1.1144328 ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0056591010.1007/BF00565910 ↗
5. 10.1121/1.41370310.1121/1.413703 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0041-624X(01)00083-X10.1016/S0041-624X(01)00083-X ↗
7. Tagawa A · E-J Adv Maint · 2009 · 1 · 52
8. Urayama R · E-J Adv Maint · 2010 · 2 · 25
9. Kosaka D · E-J Adv Maint · 2010 · 2 · 34
10. Urayama R · E-J Adv Maint · 2013 · 5 · 155
11. Takagi T, Urayama R, Ichihara T, et al. Field application of electromagnetic acoustic resonance to inspection of pipe wall thinning in a nuclear power plant, Electromagnetic Nondestructive Evaluation (XVI). Rebello JMA, Kojima F, Chady T, Eds. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): IOS Press; 2014. p. 312–318.
12. 10.14243/jsaem.26.31210.14243/jsaem.26.312 ↗
13. 2009
14. Annis C · Mater Eval · 2015 · 73 · 44
15. Berens AP · 1989 · 17 · 670
16. 10.1063/1.471642510.1063/1.4716425 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.05910.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.059 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ultras.2018.02.01210.1016/j.ultras.2018.02.012 ↗
19. 10.1080/00295450.2017.141978210.1080/00295450.2017.1419782 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.11.00410.1016/j.ultras.2017.11.004 ↗
21. 10.3233/JAE-14192610.3233/JAE-141926 ↗
22. Nakamoto H · E-J Adv Maint · 2014 · 5 · 228
23. 10.1007/s10921-012-0157-510.1007/s10921-012-0157-5 ↗
24. 10.1784/insi.2012.54.11.60610.1784/insi.2012.54.11.606 ↗
25. 10.1080/00223131.2015.106433210.1080/00223131.2015.1064332 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.03.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2016.03.001 ↗
27. 10.1177/147592171667084110.1177/1475921716670841 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.06.00810.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.06.008 ↗