Hybrid machine learning models to predict the shear strength of discontinuities with different joint wall compressive strength
Source abstract
Abstract
The shear strength of discontinuities with different joint wall compressive strength (DDJCS) is an important mechanical property. In this paper, the prediction of shear strength of DDJCS is performed using a hybrid machine learning model of artificial neural network (ANN) model with particle swarm optimisation (PSO). To develop the proposed model, a total of 168 cases are collected. Two classical models are introduced, and four performance indexes (i.e. coefficient of determination R2, mean absolute error MAE, root mean square error RMSE, and variance account for VAF) are utilised to evaluate the comprehensive predictive performances of these models. Finally, a graphical user interface (GUI) for predicting the shear strength of DDJCS is developed. The comparison results demonstrate that compared to the remaining models, this hybrid model has a better predictive performance and generalisation capability, with R2, RMSE, VAF, and MAE values of 0.999, 0.02, 99.9%, and 0.01, respectively. GUI signifies that this novel model provides an intuitive, efficient, and visual production experience for researchers. These findings can provide valuable insights for developing accurate predictive models.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Central South University
Shandong University
Southeast University
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China · Guizhou Provincial Major Scientific and Technological Program · Hunan provincial key research and development Program · Hunan Provincial Department of natural resources geological exploration project · The First National Natural Disaster Comprehensive Risk Survey in Hunan Province
References (89)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10581410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105814 ↗
2. 10.1080/10589759.2013.82360610.1080/10589759.2013.823606 ↗
3. 10.1080/10589759.2023.228706910.1080/10589759.2023.2287069 ↗
4. 10.1007/s40948-024-00736-210.1007/s40948-024-00736-2 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.10522410.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105224 ↗
6. 10.1111/ffe.1436910.1111/ffe.14369 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.10632610.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106326 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12404010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124040 ↗
9. 10.1080/10589759.2014.97778910.1080/10589759.2014.977789 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.tust.2023.10510610.1016/j.tust.2023.105106 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.10747610.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107476 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11771-023-5496-010.1007/s11771-023-5496-0 ↗
13. 10.1007/s43452-020-00097-z10.1007/s43452-020-00097-z ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12589210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125892 ↗
15. 10.1080/10589759.2023.224337310.1080/10589759.2023.2243373 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.crme.2019.08.00110.1016/j.crme.2019.08.001 ↗
17. 10.1080/10589759.2023.220871710.1080/10589759.2023.2208717 ↗
18. 10.1007/s40571-023-00660-410.1007/s40571-023-00660-4 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.10700810.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107008 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.gsf.2024.10188410.1016/j.gsf.2024.101884 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.09.00310.1016/j.jrmge.2023.09.003 ↗
22. Patton FD. Multiple modes of shear failure in rock. Proceedings of the First Congress of the International Society of Rock Mechanics; Lisbon. 1966. p. 509–513.
23. Ladanyi B, Archambault G. Simulation of shear behavior of a jointed rock mass. Proceeding of the 11th US symposium on Rock mechanics: Rock Mechanics – Theory and Practice; Berkeley, CA. 1969. 105–125.
24. 10.1007/BF0126180110.1007/BF01261801 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.03.01610.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.03.016 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.01.00710.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.01.007 ↗
27. Grasselli G. Shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description: EPFL2001 [Ph.D dissertation]. Lausanne: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.
28. 10.1007/s00603-017-1390-010.1007/s00603-017-1390-0 ↗
29. 10.1007/s12205-020-0296-710.1007/s12205-020-0296-7 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.10460510.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104605 ↗
31. 10.3389/feart.2020.0023210.3389/feart.2020.00232 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10064-018-1290-x10.1007/s10064-018-1290-x ↗
33. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.09.00210.1016/j.enggeo.2018.09.002 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.04.01010.1016/j.enggeo.2008.04.010 ↗
35. 10.1007/s00603-009-0030-810.1007/s00603-009-0030-8 ↗
36. 10.1007/s00603-021-02471-610.1007/s00603-021-02471-6 ↗
37. 10.1007/s12665-021-10041-w10.1007/s12665-021-10041-w ↗
38. 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.06.01310.1016/j.gsf.2020.06.013 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.11212610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112126 ↗
40. 10.1080/10589759.2022.213436510.1080/10589759.2022.2134365 ↗
41. 10.1111/ffe.1388910.1111/ffe.13889 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00603-024-03928-010.1007/s00603-024-03928-0 ↗
43. 10.1007/s11440-023-01826-310.1007/s11440-023-01826-3 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.00210.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.002 ↗
45. 10.1007/s40571-019-00295-410.1007/s40571-019-00295-4 ↗
46. 10.1111/ffe.1420710.1111/ffe.14207 ↗
47. 10.1007/s11771-021-4708-810.1007/s11771-021-4708-8 ↗
48. 10.1080/10589759.2024.233443410.1080/10589759.2024.2334434 ↗
49. 10.1080/10589759.2023.224094010.1080/10589759.2023.2240940 ↗
50. 10.1007/s10064-022-02874-x10.1007/s10064-022-02874-x ↗
51. 10.1007/s10064-022-02806-910.1007/s10064-022-02806-9 ↗
52. 10.1111/ffe.1432610.1111/ffe.14326 ↗
53. 10.1080/10589759.2023.227401210.1080/10589759.2023.2274012 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10460610.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104606 ↗
55. 10.1080/10589759.2023.224300410.1080/10589759.2023.2243004 ↗
56. 10.1111/ffe.1285810.1111/ffe.12858 ↗
57. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01469.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01469.x ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.01.00210.1016/j.jrmge.2019.01.002 ↗
59. Xie H, Pariseau, WG. Fractal estimation of joint roughness coefficients. Proceedings of international conference on fractured and jointed rock masses; Balkema, Rotterdam; 1995. p. 125–131.
60. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10678010.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106780 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13513310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135133 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13205210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132052 ↗
63. 10.1080/10589759.2023.220665510.1080/10589759.2023.2206655 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10822010.1016/j.jobe.2023.108220 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.08.00410.1016/j.ijmst.2021.08.004 ↗
66. 10.1007/s43452-022-00560-z10.1007/s43452-022-00560-z ↗
67. 10.1007/s10706-021-01899-510.1007/s10706-021-01899-5 ↗
68. 10.1111/ffe.1427810.1111/ffe.14278 ↗
69. 10.1007/s11277-015-2362-x10.1007/s11277-015-2362-x ↗
70. 10.1016/j.gsf.2014.10.00410.1016/j.gsf.2014.10.004 ↗
71. 10.1080/10589759.2019.162321410.1080/10589759.2019.1623214 ↗
72. 10.1080/1058975100377010010.1080/10589751003770100 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.10474510.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104745 ↗
74. 10.1080/10589759.2012.74208410.1080/10589759.2012.742084 ↗
75. Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of IEEE international conference on neural networks (ICNN ‘95). IEEE; 1995. p. 1942–1948.
76. 10.1007/s10064-018-1405-410.1007/s10064-018-1405-4 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.02.01710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.02.017 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.10532810.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105328 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.05.00310.1016/j.gsf.2020.05.003 ↗
80. 10.1111/ffe.1332510.1111/ffe.13325 ↗
81. 10.1080/10589759.2019.166290110.1080/10589759.2019.1662901 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.06.00110.1016/j.measurement.2014.06.001 ↗
83. 10.1007/s00366-015-0400-710.1007/s00366-015-0400-7 ↗
84. 10.1007/s40571-019-00228-110.1007/s40571-019-00228-1 ↗
85. 10.1007/s12665-022-10253-810.1007/s12665-022-10253-8 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.gsf.2015.07.00310.1016/j.gsf.2015.07.003 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.10426910.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104269 ↗
88. 10.1177/105678951990077810.1177/1056789519900778 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.04.01710.1016/j.enggeo.2018.04.017 ↗