journal article·2023-07-04

Effect of flaw orientation on magnetic flux leakage and remote field eddy current inspection of small diameter steel tubes

W. Sharatchandra Singh, S. Thirunavukkarasu, Anish Kumar

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents effect of flaw orientation on magnetic flux leakage (MFL) and remote field eddy current (RFEC) inspection of small diameter (19.05-mm outer diameter, OD and 2.77-mm wall thickness, WT) seamless low carbon steel tubes. Artificial electro-discharge machined (EDM) notches in three carbon steel Tubes A (orientations from 0° to 90° in steps of 10° and 50% WT depth), B (70° orientation and depths from 10% WT to 100% WT in steps of 10% WT) and C (50° orientation and depths from 10% WT to 60% WT in steps of 10% WT) were used to investigate the detectability of notches with different orientations and depths. Studies on different notch orientations reveal that RFEC technique detected all the notches with good signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), while MFL technique detected the notches with orientations from 40° to 90°. The effect of notch orientation is observed more in MFL technique as compared to RFEC technique. Further, the effects of scanning speed and notch depth for the detection of oriented notches were studied. Studies reveal that the effect of scanning speed is also more (40 times) dominant in MFL technique as compared to RFEC technique. Studies also reveal that the scanning effect is again dependent upon the notch depth. For 70° oriented notches, MFL technique is found to be more sensitive to notch depth as compared to RFEC technique. For 50° oriented notches, RFEC technique is found to be more sensitive to notch depth as compared to MFL technique.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Non-Destructive Evaluation Division, Metallurgy and Materials Group, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam, Tamil Nadu, India

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Vivekananda KS · 2006
2. Bergender MJ. · Mater Eval · 1986 · 44 · 811
3. 10.4236/eng.2020.12803810.4236/eng.2020.128038 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.anucene.2015.04.00610.1016/j.anucene.2015.04.006 ↗
5. Förster F · Br J Non-Destr Test · 1977 · 19 · 26
6. 10.1080/1058975920895301110.1080/10589759208953011 ↗
7. Mackintosh DD · Mater Eval · 1996 · 54 · 652
8. Al-Qadeeb FA · 2005
9. Sadek HM · Test and Cond Monit · 2006 · 48 · 181
10. 10.1109/TMAG.2014.235046010.1109/TMAG.2014.2350460 ↗
11. 10.1109/20.76736910.1109/20.767369 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0963-8695(02)00103-210.1016/S0963-8695(02)00103-2 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.09.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2013.09.005 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.01.00610.1016/j.matlet.2004.01.006 ↗
15. 10.3390/s14122409810.3390/s141224098 ↗
16. 10.1504/IJIED.2014.06409310.1504/IJIED.2014.064093 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.02.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2014.02.001 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10921-019-0567-810.1007/s10921-019-0567-8 ↗
19. Olympus multi-scan MS5800 user manual.
20. Atherton DL · Mater Eval · 1993 · 51 · 782
21. 10.1109/20.48988810.1109/20.489888 ↗
22. Bray DE · 1989 · 318