journal article·2021-09-03

Integrating non-destructive testing data to produce asphalt pavement critical strains

Christina Plati, Konstantinos Gkyrtis, Andreas Loizos

Publisher page

Abstract

Knowledge of critical strains during the asphalt pavements’ life is an inherent process within pavement structural assessment. Highway agencies need this knowledge to effectively manage potential maintenance activities. Conventional practice includes mechanistic analysis of data collected in-situ. Contrariwise, developing models or algorithms for strain prediction bypasses the time-consuming processes of back-analysis and strain analysis and contributes towards a more efficient assessment. This research deals with adaptability issues of empirical equations suggested in the international literature for the estimation of tensile strains at the bottom of asphalt concrete (AC) layers. For this purpose, non-destructive testing data collected from a trial section of a heavy-duty highway is utilised. Moving forward with the research, new models are developed for AC strain estimation considering the effect of AC temperature on the developed strains. From a statistical view, the high R2 values indicate acceptable goodness of fit for the new equations. These results outline the feasibility of using the developed equations to ensure time and cost savings towards the acceleration of pavement evaluation processes. Besides, these results motivate future research to consider variable pavement structures, material and climatic conditions during model development, since the use of existing equations elsewhere may not be a rational approach.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Technical University of Athens (NTUA)

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000083210.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000832 ↗
2. 10.3141/1860-1010.3141/1860-10 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10712-019-09518-y10.1007/s10712-019-09518-y ↗
4. Gkyrtis K Loizos A Plati C. A mechanistic framework for field response assessment of asphalt pavements. Int J Pave Res Tech. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-020-0097–x10.1007/s42947-020-0097-x ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.03410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.034 ↗
6. 10.3846/13923730.2015.107317310.3846/13923730.2015.1073173 ↗
7. 10.3141/1716-0410.3141/1716-04 ↗
8. Zhang Z, Claros G, Manuel L, et al. Evaluation of the pavement structural condition at network level using falling weight deflectometer (FWD) Data. Paper presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 12–16 January 2003, Washington, D.C. USA.
9. 10.3141/2366-1410.3141/2366-14 ↗
10. 10.3141/2304-0910.3141/2304-09 ↗
11. Applied Research Associates (ARA). Guide for mechanistic empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. NCHRP 1-37A Final Report Transportation Research Board Washington DC 2004.
12. Horak E. Benchmarking the structural condition of flexible pavements with deflection bowl parameters. J South Afr Inst Civil Eng. 2008;50:2–9.
13. Horak E, Emery S Falling weight deflectometer bowl parameters as analysis tool for pavement structural evaluations. Proceedings of 22nd ARRB conference: research into practice: proceedings, 2006 October–November 29–2; Australia.
14. Leiva-Villacorta F, Timm D Falling weight deflectometer loading pulse duration and its effect on predicted pavement responses. Paper presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.: 2013.
15. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2005.10.00110.1016/j.advengsoft.2005.10.001 ↗
16. 10.1201/9781315100333-9910.1201/9781315100333-99 ↗
17. Akbarzadeh H, Bayat A, Soleymani HR. Analytical review of the HMA temperature correction factors from laboratory and falling weight deflectometer tests. Int J Pavement Res Technol. 2012;5:30–39.
18. Zang G, Li L, Chen Z, et al. A nondestructive evaluation method for semi-rigid base cracking condition. Paper presented at 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board; Washington, D.C.: 2017.
19. 10.1061/JPEODX.000004410.1061/JPEODX.0000044 ↗
20. Van-Geem C, Nigro P, Berlemont B The use of deflection measurements in pavement management of the primary road network of Wallonia, Belgium. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Managing Pavement Assets (ICMPA); 2015 May 18- 21; United States.
21. 10.1080/14680629.2008.969017510.1080/14680629.2008.9690175 ↗
22. Hassan H, Mousa RM. Evaluation of non-destructive testing data using AASHTO and WESDEF backcalculation approaches. J Eng Appl Sci. 2003;50:75–93.
23. AASHTO Guide for design of pavement structures american association of state highway and transportation officials Washington DC USA 1993.
24. 10.3141/2641-0610.3141/2641-06 ↗
25. 10.1201/9781315100333-7710.1201/9781315100333-77 ↗
26. 10.1080/10298436.2015.108815210.1080/10298436.2015.1088152 ↗
27. Nasimifar M, Siddharthan RS, Hajj EY, et al. Investigation of 3D-move responses under traffic speed deflection devices (TSDDs). Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Accelerated Pavement Testing; 2016 Sept 19-21; Costa R, Moya A (eds.); 2017, p. 161–176.
28. 10.1080/10298436.2016.114983610.1080/10298436.2016.1149836 ↗
29. 10.3141/2094-0110.3141/2094-01 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:7(574)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:7(574) ↗
31. Molenaar AAA. Structural evaluation and strengthening of flexible pavements using deflection measurements and visual condition surveys. In: Structural design of pavements – part IV. San Jose, Costa Rica; 2006.
32. Jung FW. Direct calculation of maximum curvature and strain in asphalt concrete layers of pavements from load deflection basin measurements. Transp Res Rec. 1988;1196:125–132.
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1999)125:3(238)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1999)125:3(238) ↗
34. Kim YR Park H Use of FWD multi-load data for pavement strength estimation. Report No. FHWA/NC/2002-006 North Carolina Department of Transportation 2002.
35. Plati C, Loizos A. Using ground-penetrating radar for assessing the structural needs of asphalt pavements. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval. 2012;27(3):273–284.
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1996)2:2(94)10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1996)2:2(94) ↗
37. Smith KD Bruinsma JE Wade MJ et al. Using falling weight deflectometer data with mechanistic-empirical design and analysis volume I: final report. Report No. FHWA-HRT-16-009. Federal Highway Administration McLean VA 2017.
38. 10.1515/rjti-2015-001510.1515/rjti-2015-0015 ↗
39. EVERSERIES© USER’S GUIDE. Pavement analysis computer software and case studies Washington State Department of Transportation 2005.
40. BISAR. Shell pavement design method BISAR PC user manual shell international petroleum Company Limited London. 1998.
41. 10.1155/2014/37283810.1155/2014/372838 ↗
42. 10.1080/14680629.2019.159322910.1080/14680629.2019.1593229 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jtte.2018.07.00310.1016/j.jtte.2018.07.003 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.11310.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.113 ↗
45. Irwin LH, Yang WS, Stubstad RN (1989) Deflection Reading Accuracy and Layer Thickness Accuracy in Backcalculation of Pavement Layer Modul. First international symposium on nondestructive testing of pavements and backcalculation of Moduli, ASTM STP 1026. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
46. Irwin LH Backcalculation: an overview and perspective. Presented at the 2002 FWD User Group Annual Meeting, 2002, Roanoke, VA.
47. 10.1179/1938636212Z.000000000910.1179/1938636212Z.0000000009 ↗
48. 10.3390/rs1004055910.3390/rs10040559 ↗
49. Plati C Loizos A Gkyrtis K. Integration of non-destructive testing methods to assess asphalt pavement thickness. NDT & E Int. 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.10229210.5194/egusphere-egu2020-3422 ↗