Effects of the wire mesh on pulsed eddy current detection of corrosion under insulation
Source abstract
Abstract
Pulsed eddy current (PEC) technique has been used to detect corrosion under insulation (CUI) for decades, but whether and how the wire mesh laid in the insulation layer affects the detection remains ambiguous. This paper touches on this issue for the first time. The insulated structure was simplified to a carbon steel plate covered by a cladding with an air gap representing the insulation layer, in which the wire mesh was situated. Finite element simulations were performed on the simplified model and found that the aluminium or stainless steel wire mesh had little effect on eddy currents in the plate, while the mild steel wire mesh could cause a considerable increase in the probe footprint and a significant drop of the eddy current density. For the mild steel wire mesh, the magnetic permeability and wire diameter were the main factors affecting the probe footprint and eddy current density. Afterwards, simulations were conducted to analyse the effect of the mild steel wire mesh on the PEC probe performances for evaluating the CUI depth and found that the mild steel wire mesh led to decreases in both the PEC signal amplitude and decay rate. The simulation results were finally verified by experiments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-08-101105-8.00017-610.1016/B978-0-08-101105-8.00017-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.03.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2016.03.006 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41598-020-58122-310.1038/s41598-020-58122-3 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.infrared.2013.03.00610.1016/j.infrared.2013.03.006 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10921-011-0121-910.1007/s10921-011-0121-9 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.10406010.1016/j.jlp.2020.104060 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.07.01010.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.07.010 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.08.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2012.08.004 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.10238410.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102384 ↗
10. Robers MA
11. 10.1115/PVP2008-6123910.1115/PVP2008-61239 ↗
12. Lyft E. Pulsed eddy current array (PECA™) probe selection and footprint—carbon steel (Lyft 2.2). [Accessed February 4 2022]. https://eddyfi.com/doc/Downloadables/201908_Eddyfi-LYFT-footprint-poster_INTERACTIVE-01.pdf
13. Wassink C · Mater Eval · 2018 · 76 · 700
14. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.07.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2012.07.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.08.00310.1016/j.ndteint.2018.08.003 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10921-020-00699-w10.1007/s10921-020-00699-w ↗
17. 10.1007/978-1-4684-5772-8_10710.1007/978-1-4684-5772-8_107 ↗
18. Cheng W · 2012
19. 10.1007/s10921-020-00679-010.1007/s10921-020-00679-0 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10921-019-0638-x10.1007/s10921-019-0638-x ↗
21. Demers-Carpentier V · 2017
22. Robert WP. NDT inspection of insulated vessels and piping for interior corrosion and CUI. [Accessed 4 February 2022]. https://insulation.org/io/articles/ndt-inspection-of-insulated-vessels-and-piping-for-interior-corrosion-and-cui/
23. Innospection. Pulsed eddy current testing (PECT) inspection technique. [Accessed 4 February 2022]. https://www.innospection.com/images/PDF/corrosion/Technology_-_Pulse_Eddy_Current_Testing_PECT_Technique-min.pdf
24. 10.1109/TMAG.2002.80357210.1109/TMAG.2002.803572 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.12.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2012.12.002 ↗
26. Grenier M
27. 10.1109/TIM.2020.300511410.1109/TIM.2020.3005114 ↗
28. 10.3390/electronics805047010.3390/electronics8050470 ↗
29. Robers MA · 2002
30. 10.1109/15.47734210.1109/15.477342 ↗