journal article·2023-05-04

Phased array ultrasonic imaging and characterization of adhesive bonding between thermoplastic composites aided by machine learning

Guanyu Piao, Jorge Mateus, Jiaoyang Li, Ranjit Pachha, Parvinder Walia, Yiming Deng, Sunil Kishore Chakrapani

Publisher page

Abstract

The testing and evaluation of adhesive bonding quality between thermoplastics are crucial for structural integrity. This article presents the use of phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT) method to characterise the adhesive interface between thermoplastic composites. Samples with three different bond conditions: control, bad and mid-level were fabricated and tested using PAUT. A damage index (DI) based classification framework aided by machine learning (ML) algorithm is proposed to classify different adhesion conditions. A set of 18 physics-based damage indices were extracted from each PAUT image for quantitative characterisation. ML algorithms were developed to build a non-linear mapping that correlates the input DIs with the output sample types to address the classification problem. The experimental results show that support vector machine (SVM) performs better than other ML algorithms with classification accuracy greater than 95%, and the defined DIs can differentiate among bad, mid-level, and control samples.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Michigan State University

MAGNA Exteriors Inc. Concord

MAGNA Exteriors Inc

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2015.09.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2015.09.001 ↗
2. 10.1243/14644207JMDA21910.1243/14644207JMDA219 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00125-210.1016/S0263-8223(00)00125-2 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00044-010.1016/S0143-7496(00)00044-0 ↗
5. 10.1002/stc.284910.1002/stc.2849 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.10248110.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102481 ↗
7. K CS, Dayal V, Krafka R, et al. Ultrasonic testing of adhesive bonds of thick composites with applications to wind turbine blades,aip Conf Proc. Am Inst Phys. 2012;1430(1):1284–1290.
8. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.10267510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102675 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0963-8695(03)00045-810.1016/S0963-8695(03)00045-8 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.03.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2018.03.006 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.05.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2018.05.005 ↗
12. Ehrhart B, Valeske B, Bockenheimer C. Non-destructive evaluation (NDE) of aerospace composites: methods for testing adhesively bonded composites. Non-Destruct Eval Polym Matrix Compos. 2013;220–237.
13. 10.1163/15685610677741249110.1163/156856106777412491 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.004 ↗
15. 10.1098/rsta.2019.059010.1098/rsta.2019.0590 ↗
16. Zeighami M, Honarvar F. New approaches for testing of adhesive joints by ultrasonic C-scan imaging technique. Mater Eval. 2009;67(8):945–954.
17. 10.3390/ma1012140210.3390/ma10121402 ↗
18. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa678710.1088/1361-665X/aa6787 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.14430110.1103/PhysRevLett.113.144301 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.03.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2006.03.006 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10626410.1016/j.ultras.2020.106264 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.006 ↗
23. 10.1109/TUFFC.2017.272681910.1109/TUFFC.2017.2726819 ↗
24. 10.1080/10589759.2019.156690510.1080/10589759.2019.1566905 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ultras.2015.05.00710.1016/j.ultras.2015.05.007 ↗
26. 10.3390/s2109304810.3390/s21093048 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.sna.2008.01.02010.1016/j.sna.2008.01.020 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10889410.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108894 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11423310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114233 ↗
30. Yeh RY, Hsu RQ. Improving the adhesion of plastic/metal direct bonding by injection moulding using surface modifications. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2016;2(1):21–30.
31. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000007726.58758.e410.1023/B:JMSC.0000007726.58758.e4 ↗
32. 10.1163/156855198X0004810.1163/156855198X00048 ↗
33. Li J Gopalakrishnan K Piao G et al. Classification of adhesive bonding between thermoplastic composites using ultrasonics and machine learning under review.
34. Gopalakrishnan K, Deng Y, Chakrapani S. Studying the effect of primer coatings and surface activations on adhesion in adhesively bonded plastic plates using ultrasonic testing. Rev Prog Quant Nondestruct Eval. 2019;1–3.
35. Supriyanti R, A PD, Murdyantoro E, et al. Comparing edge detection methods to localize uterus area on ultrasound image//2013 3rd Int Conf Instrum, Commun. Inf Technol Biomed Eng (ICICI-BME) IEEE. 2013. p. 152–155.
36. Khairudin M Irmawati D. Comparison methods of edge detection for USG images/ r/2016 3rd Int Conf Inf Technol Comp Electr Eng (ICITACEE). IEEE. 2016. pp. 85–88.10.1109/ICITACEE.2016.7892416 ↗