Experimental investigation on the effect of glass fiber orientation on impact damage resistance under cyclic indentation loading using AE monitoring
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper investigates the effect of glass fibre orientation on the impact damage evolution and post-impact residual strength of glass/epoxy laminates, using mechanical and acoustic emission (AE) analysis. The glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite laminates with stacking sequence such as 0°, 90°, [±45°] and [0°/90°] were tested. The indentation-induced damage behaviour was examined in GFRP composite laminates by conducting drop weight impact and quasi-static indentation (QSI) tests to induce barely visible impact damage (BVID). Both tests provided essentially the same results for damage modes, dent depth, back surface crack size and load-deflection history. Mechanical parameters such as peak force, incident energy, absorbed energy, rebound energy and linear stiffness were used for the quantification of the indentation response. The AE parameters, such as amplitude, rise time, counts and energy were considered for monitoring damage progression during QSI loading. Also, other parameters linked to AE monitoring, such as the rise angle (RA), Felicity ratio (FR) and sentry function (SF) were measured for evaluating damage progression in each cycle of indentation. These results showed the [±45°] laminates having higher indentation damage resistance compared to other fibre orientation, whereas residual compressive strength was high for 0° laminates.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Madras Institute of Technology Campus, Chromepet, Anna University, Chennai, India
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirapalli, India
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Nanyang, Singapore
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.05.00110.1016/j.paerosci.2010.05.001 ↗
2. 10.1177/00219983980320120310.1177/002199839803201203 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00021-X10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00021-X ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.07810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.078 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.06.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2016.06.023 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.03310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.033 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.09710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.097 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.04310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.043 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.06410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.064 ↗
10. 10.1520/JTE2018070110.1520/JTE20180701 ↗
11. 10.7763/IJAPM.2012.V2.5410.7763/IJAPM.2012.V2.54 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.013 ↗
13. Flores JEA · Inter J Comput Meth · 2014 · 11 · 344004
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.08.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2010.08.004 ↗
15. Caprino G, Lopresto V. Factors affecting the penetration energy of glass fiber reinforced plastics subjected to a concentrated transverse load. Proceedings of 9th European Conference on Composite Materials (ECCM-9); Brighton, UK; 2000. p. 4–7.
16. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00152-410.1016/S0266-3538(00)00152-4 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1359-8368(03)00002-710.1016/S1359-8368(03)00002-7 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.02910.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.029 ↗
19. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)90152-X10.1016/0266-3538(94)90152-X ↗
20. 10.1177/00219983910250020510.1177/002199839102500205 ↗
21. 10.1177/00219983880220010310.1177/002199838802200103 ↗
22. 10.4236/ojcm.2012.2100210.4236/ojcm.2012.21002 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00196-710.1016/S0266-3538(99)00196-7 ↗
24. 10.1016/0734-743X(94)00039-Y10.1016/0734-743X(94)00039-Y ↗
25. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00078-710.1016/S1359-835X(02)00078-7 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.01710.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.017 ↗
27. Ramazan K · Indian J Eng Mater Sci · 2010 · 17 · 186
28. 10.1016/0963-8695(88)90113-210.1016/0963-8695(88)90113-2 ↗
29. Suresh Kumar C · J Nondestruct Eval · 2015 · 34 · 1
30. Arumugam V · J Test Eval · 2011 · 39 · 110.1520/JTE103730 ↗
31. Suresh Kumar C · Struct Health Monit · 2018 · 18 · 1253
32. 10.1080/10589759.2019.159082910.1080/10589759.2019.1590829 ↗
33. 10.1023/A:101234662480210.1023/A:1012346624802 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.012 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.03510.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.035 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10696210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106962 ↗
37. Ashok Kumar M · Adv Mater Sci · 2014 · 14 · 40
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.05010.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.050 ↗
39. 10.1177/073168441454439110.1177/0731684414544391 ↗
40. 10.1177/002199831350950410.1177/0021998313509504 ↗