Probability of detection applied to X-ray inspection using numerical simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, we apply and adapt established probability of detection (POD) methods on the in-line inspection of aluminium cylinder heads using X-ray computed tomography (XCT). We propose to use the XCT simulation tool SimCT to simulate virtual X-ray radiographs from the specimen including artificial defects, which avoids the manufacturing of specimens with calibrated defects of known type (e.g. pores, inclusions, cracks) and characteristics (e.g. size, shape, location). To quantify the POD, these virtual images are analysed using ZEISS automated defect detection (ZADD) to determine defects automatically. ZADD is a deep learning application for anomaly defect detection, classification and segmentation. To create respective POD curves, we apply a hit/miss approach. We demonstrate our method on artificial defects of different sizes, location and material types. Eight representative defects are discussed in detail together with the generated POD curves as well as their characteristics. We finally discuss the advantages of numerical simulations with respect to the probability of detection in order to quantify and improve detection limits.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Image and Object Detection Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research Group X-ray Computed Tomography, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Wels, Austria
Lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
Department of Process Engineering, Nemak Linz GmbH, Linz, Austria
Funding
FFG · Upper Austria and Styria · European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Reiter M · 2016
2. 10.1007/978-3-319-59573-3_410.1007/978-3-319-59573-3_4 ↗
3. 10.1111/cgf.1321410.1111/cgf.13214 ↗
4. 10.1007/978-3-030-79150-6_1810.1007/978-3-030-79150-6_18 ↗
5. Berens AP · 1989 · 17 · 689
6. 10.1007/s10921-014-0258-410.1007/s10921-014-0258-4 ↗
7. US Department Of Defense · 1999
8. 10.1115/1.404451510.1115/1.4044515 ↗
9. 10.1051/ijmqe/201701510.1051/ijmqe/2017015 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70239-610.1016/S1369-7021(08)70239-6 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.04.09410.1016/j.neucom.2021.04.094 ↗
12. Reisinger S · 2011
13. 10.1364/OE.24.02512910.1364/OE.24.025129 ↗
14. 10.1118/1.323182410.1118/1.3231824 ↗
15. 10.1787/32da5043-en10.1787/32da5043-en ↗
16. 10.1088/0031-9155/49/19/00710.1088/0031-9155/49/19/007 ↗
17. 10.1364/OE.39233710.1364/OE.392337 ↗
18. 10.1784/insi.2007.49.7.40910.1784/insi.2007.49.7.409 ↗
19. 10.1088/1757-899x/1022/1/01202710.1088/1757-899x/1022/1/012027 ↗
20. 10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_4910.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49 ↗
21. Yosifov M. Extraction and quantification of features in XCT datasets of fibre reinforced polymers using machine learning techniques [master’s thesis]. Umeå University, Department of Computing Science; 2020.
22. Reiter M · 2019
23. CERA user manual version 6.0.0; 2019. Available from: https://www.cera-systeem.nl/en/downloads.
24. 10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-610.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0229436110.1007/BF02294361 ↗
26. Demidenko E · Math Commun · 1997 · 6 · 233
27. Li J. Choosing the proper link function for binary data [master’s thesis]; 2014.