Evaluation of the ratio between uniaxial compressive strength and Schmidt hammer rebound number and its effectiveness in predicting rock strength
Source abstract
Abstract
Schmidt rebound hammer (SRH) test has been used worldwide as an index test for estimating the compressive strength and deformation characteristics of intact rocks. Although there is a high correlation between the surface hardness and the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of intact rocks, the SRH provides only a crude estimate for the UCS of rocks. SRH numbers reflect the outer surface of rocks and a depth of 30-50mm. It is not sensitive to the intrinsic properties of the rocks such as texture, saturation, porosity and micro-fractures controlling the mechanical behaviour of rocks. In order for an empirical equation relating the surface hardness to the UCS to be widely used, the index parameter should characterise the mechanical properties of intact rocks. The ratio of UCS/SRH defined as a function of the UCS is a much better indicator for assessing the mechanical characteristics of rocks because the UCS of rocks defines the strength of the material and the ratio UCS/SRH is strongly affected by the level of the UCS. The ratio of UCS/SRH increases with increasing compressive strength at an increasing rate. A large-scale regression analysis was carried out using experimental data to evaluate the ratio of UCS/SRH for the rocks. The accuracy and reliability of the relationship was assessed by means of the root mean square error. The standard error associated with the empirical relationship is very small and the reliability and accuracy of the relationship to assess the compressive strength indirectly seem to be higher than those of traditional relationships between the UCS and the SRH. The ratio of UCS/SRH was also verified by a large database collected from previous studies. This strong linear relationship is proposed for engineering projects requiring the estimation of the compressive strength for intact rocks.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Schmidt E · Concrete · 1951 · 59 · 34
2. 10.1007/BF0259497710.1007/BF02594977 ↗
3. Büyüksağı¸ IS · Int Rock Mech Min Sci · 2007 · 44 · 29910.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.07.008 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.09.01010.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.09.010 ↗
5. 10.2478/popore-2014-000810.2478/popore-2014-0008 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.01.00310.1016/j.enggeo.2005.01.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00149-710.1016/S0013-7952(02)00149-7 ↗
8. KidybinskiA. Method of investigation, estimation and classification of roofs in the USA for the selection of suitable mechanized support for long walls. Project no. 14-01-0001-1450Katowice: Central Mining Institute; 1980.
9. TorabiSR, SereshkiF, ZareM, JavanshirM. An empirical approach in prediction of the roof rock strength in underground coal mines. Proceedings of coal operators' conference. Wollongong: University of Wollongong; 2008. p. 1342–1346.
10. 10.1016/0148-9062(82)90710-010.1016/0148-9062(82)90710-0 ↗
11. 10.1016/0167-9031(90)90303-A10.1016/0167-9031(90)90303-A ↗
12. 10.1007/s00603005000110.1007/s006030050001 ↗
13. 10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00007-110.1016/S1365-1609(00)00007-1 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.12.00210.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.12.002 ↗
15. 10.1016/0148-9062(75)90004-210.1016/0148-9062(75)90004-2 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.10.00810.1016/j.enggeo.2007.10.008 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2003.10.00110.1016/j.enggeo.2003.10.001 ↗
18. 10.1177/030913330607195410.1177/0309133306071954 ↗
19. GrassoP, XuS, MahtabA. Problems and promises of index testing of rocks. In: JR Tilerson, WR Wawerelk, editors. The 33th U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS); Balkema, Rotterdam. American Rock Mechanics Association; 1992.
20. 10.1016/0148-9062(80)91363-710.1016/0148-9062(80)91363-7 ↗
21. 10.1002/esp.40210.1002/esp.402 ↗
22. 10.1002/esp.329008031110.1002/esp.3290080311 ↗
23. Mohamed Z · Electron J Geotech Eng · 2007 · 12 · 1
24. HaramyKY, De MarcoMJ. Use of Schmidt hammer for rock and coal testing. Use of Schmidt hammer for rock and coal testing. Proceedings of 26th US symposium on rock mechanics; 26–28 June; Rapid City, South Dakota. American Rock Mechanics Association. Balkema, Rotterdam; 1985. p. 549–555.
25. Del Porto R · Rock Mech Rock Eng · 2008 · 42 · 931
26. 10.1016/0148-9062(84)90008-110.1016/0148-9062(84)90008-1 ↗
27. Gökçeoğlu C · [An assessment for predicting uniaxial compressive strength using the Schmidt hardness hammer] Jeol Muh · 1996 · 48 · 78
28. 10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00041-810.1016/S0013-7952(02)00041-8 ↗
29. Karaoğlu Ö · Turk J Earth Sci · 2005 · 14 · 123
30. 10.1007/s00445-013-0714-510.1007/s00445-013-0714-5 ↗
31. AcarlarM, BilginAZ, ElibolE, ErkanT, Gedikİ, GünerE, HakyemezY, ŞenAM, UğuzMF, UmutM. The Geology for eastern and northern part of Lake Van. The Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (MTA), Report No. 9469 (94). Ankara/Turkey(in Turkish)1991.
32. 10.1016/0148-9062(65)90009-410.1016/0148-9062(65)90009-4 ↗
33. Soiltest Inc.Operating instructions – concrete test hammer. Evanston, IL: Soiltest Inc.1976.
34. USBR. Engineering geology field manual. Field index tests. U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado. Vol. 1.1998.
35. ISRM. Suggested methods rock characterization, testing and monitoring. In: BrownET, editors. Rock characterization. Testing and monitoring: ISRM suggested Methods. Oxford, Pergamon; 1981, 95–6.
36. ASTM. Standard test method for determination of rock hardness by rebound hammer method. ASTM Standard 04.09 (D 5873-00), American Society for Testing and Materials, PA-USA,2000.
37. AydayC, GoktanRM. Correlations between L and N-type Schmidt hammer rebound values obtained during field testing. Proceedings of EUROCK'92, The International Society for Rock Mechamics. Chester, UK. 1992. p. 47–50.
38. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.00610.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.006 ↗
39. ASTM. Standard test method for unconfined strength of intact rock core specimens. ASTM Standard D2938-95, American Society for Testing and Materials, PA-USA; 2000.
40. MakridakisSG, HibonM. Evaluating accuracy (or error) measures. Working papers. 95/18/TM/INSEAD. European Institute of Business Administration, Fontainebleau, France 1995.
41. Deere DU, Miller RP. Engineering classification and index properties for intact rocks. Technical Report. New Mexico: Air Force Weapons Lab; no. AFNL-TR1966.10.21236/AD0646610 ↗
42. Aufmuth RE · Bull Assoc Eng Geol · 1973 · 11 · 235
43. BeverlyBE, SchoenwolfDA, BrierlyGS. Correlations of rock index values with engineering properties and the classification of intact rock. Washington, DC: FHWA; 1979.
44. SinghRN, HassaniFP, ElkingtonPAS. The application of strength and deformation index testing to the stability assessment of coal measures excavations. Proceedings of 24th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics. Balkema: Texas A&M University, AEG; 1983. p. 599–609.
45. GhoseAK, ChakrabortiS. Empirical strength indices of Indian coals – an investigation. Proceedings of 27th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration: Balkema; 1986. p. 59–61.
46. O'Rourke JE · Min Eng · 1989 · 286 · 106
47. 10.1007/BF0259262210.1007/BF02592622 ↗
48. XuS, GrassoP, MahtabA. Use of Schmidt hammer for estimating mechanical properties of weak rock. 6th International IAEG Congress. Balkema; 1990;1: 511–519.
49. KahramanS. The reliability of Schmidt hammer and point load index for estimating compressive strength. In: Korkmaz veS, AkcayM, editors. K.T.U Dept of Geol. Eng. Proceedings of 30th Anniversary geology Symposium, Trabzon-Turkey; 1996. p. 362–369(in Turkish).
50. 10.1016/S0013-7952(98)00071-410.1016/S0013-7952(98)00071-4 ↗
51. 10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00004-610.1016/S1365-1609(00)00004-6 ↗
52. 10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00039-910.1016/S1365-1609(01)00039-9 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0013-7952(03)00141-810.1016/S0013-7952(03)00141-8 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.12.00610.1016/j.enggeo.2006.12.006 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10064-008-0128-310.1007/s10064-008-0128-3 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.04.00410.1016/j.enggeo.2013.04.004 ↗