Bolt preload monitoring based on percussion sound signal and convolutional neural network (CNN)
Source abstract
Abstract
The general approach to percussion-based monitoring of bolt preload is to train a classifier model to map the preloads and acoustic characteristics of percussion signals. However, the traditional percussion-based approach can only classify the preloads of bolts into certain ranges, and cannot accurately predict the exact bolt preload. This paper proposes an approach to estimate bolt preload using a convolutional neural network (CNN). The frequency contents of the percussion signals are analysed with the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), and the magnitudes of signals in different frequencies ranges are reconstructed into a matrix, which can be treated as an image. Each image is labelled with the corresponding bolt preload. Then the labelled images are used to train the CNN model, and the trained model is used to detect the actual preload of a selected bolt. The proposed model was experimentally verified using a bolted steel plate. The results show that the proposed model can accurately predict the preload values outside the range of training samples with an accuracy over 95%. Meanwhile, compared with the predicted effect of the traditional regression models, the predicted validity of the proposed model is further verified.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
Funding
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/s1704077610.3390/s17040776 ↗
2. 10.1080/10589759.2012.74004210.1080/10589759.2012.740042 ↗
3. 10.1080/10589759.2015.105837610.1080/10589759.2015.1058376 ↗
4. 10.1080/10589759.2015.104645310.1080/10589759.2015.1046453 ↗
5. Cui E · J Civ Struct Health Monit · 2021 · 1
6. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.06.00610.1016/j.engstruct.2019.06.006 ↗
7. Huo LS · Smart Mater Struct · 2017 · 26 · 10
8. Wang F · Smart Mater Struct · 2017 · 27 · 1
9. 10.1080/1058975100377011810.1080/10589751003770118 ↗
10. Ostachowicz WM · 2011
11. 10.3390/app611034110.3390/app6110341 ↗
12. Chen DD · Sensors · 2018 · 18 · 8
13. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.02610.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.026 ↗
14. 10.3390/app801010710.3390/app8010107 ↗
15. Huo LS · Smart Mater Struct · 2017 · 26 · 5
16. 10.1177/1045389X1875435410.1177/1045389X18754354 ↗
17. 10.1007/s13349-018-0307-210.1007/s13349-018-0307-2 ↗
18. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.285569310.1109/ACCESS.2018.2855693 ↗
19. Chen DD · Smart Struct Syst · 2020 · 25 · 423
20. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/8/08700110.1088/0964-1726/22/8/087001 ↗
21. Huo LS · Smart Mater Struct · 2017 · 26 · 2
22. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab3a0810.1088/1361-665X/ab3a08 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.03610.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.036 ↗
24. 10.3390/s1612208310.3390/s16122083 ↗
25. 10.1109/SDPC.2018.866482710.1109/SDPC.2018.8664827 ↗
26. 10.1177/147592171879076810.1177/1475921718790768 ↗
27. Xiang Z · J Exp Mech · 2012 · 27 · 545
28. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.05.01310.1016/j.ymssp.2010.05.013 ↗
29. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/2/00110.1088/0964-1726/13/2/001 ↗
30. 10.1109/TIE.2019.289955510.1109/TIE.2019.2899555 ↗
31. 10.12989/was.2015.21.6.70910.12989/was.2015.21.6.709 ↗
32. 10.1117/12.254759510.1117/12.2547595 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.06.00810.1016/j.autcon.2016.06.008 ↗
34. 10.1177/147592171875745910.1177/1475921718757459 ↗
35. 10.1115/1.284209310.1115/1.2842093 ↗
36. 10.1378/chest.75.1.2910.1378/chest.75.1.29 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0954-6111(06)80209-X10.1016/S0954-6111(06)80209-X ↗
38. 10.1016/S0011-5029(95)90098-510.1016/S0011-5029(95)90098-5 ↗
39. 10.1617/s11527-014-0506-110.1617/s11527-014-0506-1 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10786910.1016/j.measurement.2020.107869 ↗
41. 10.1080/10589759.2013.82361110.1080/10589759.2013.823611 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11976110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119761 ↗
43. 10.1088/1361-665X/aac96210.1088/1361-665X/aac962 ↗
44. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab3b3910.1088/1361-665X/ab3b39 ↗
45. 10.1177/136943321985256510.1177/1369433219852565 ↗
46. 10.1080/10589759.2014.91421010.1080/10589759.2014.914210 ↗
47. 10.1080/10589759.2013.82360810.1080/10589759.2013.823608 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.10284410.1016/j.autcon.2019.102844 ↗
49. 10.1177/147592171989061610.1177/1475921719890616 ↗
50. 10.1177/147592171880036310.1177/1475921718800363 ↗
51. 10.1177/147592171984605110.1177/1475921719846051 ↗
52. 10.1177/147592171987563010.1177/1475921719875630 ↗
53. 10.1111/mice.1226310.1111/mice.12263 ↗
54. Cha YJ · Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng · 2018 · 33 · 1