A two-stage finite element model of a meander coil electromagnetic acoustic transducer transmitter
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a two-stage numerical model of a meander coil electromagnetic acoustic transducer transmitter operating on the Lorentz force principle. This model was used to predict the ultrasonic A-scan signals for bulk (longitudinal and shear) and guided (Rayleigh) waves in isotropic homogeneous materials. The simulation results agree with the experimental results. The grating effects of the meandering coil, for different coil spacings, are also discussed in this paper.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Maxfield B.W. · Mater. Eval. · 1987 · 45 · 1166
2. Frost H.M. · 1979 · 14 · 176
3. Thompson R.B. · 1990 · 19 · 157
4. Fortunko C.M. · Rev. Prog. Quant. NDE · 2003 · 2 · 283
5. 10.1121/1.191161710.1121/1.1911617 ↗
6. Thompson R.B. · IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason. · 1978 · 25 · 710.1109/T-SU.1978.30979 ↗
7. Maxfield, B.W. and Hulbert, J.K. 1975.Electromagnetic Acoustic Wave Transducers: Generation and mode patterns, Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on NDE, San Antonio, TX, April 23–30 44–62.
8. B.W. Maxfield, Electromagnetic generation and defection of acoustic waves, Cornell Materials Science Center Report No. 1573, June (1971)
9. Maxfield B.W. · Mater. Eval. · 1983 · 41 · 1399
10. Silk, M.G. 1984.Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducers, Ultrasonic Transducers for Nondestructive Testing, 111–119. Bristol: Adam Hilger Ltd.
11. Alers G.A. · Mater. Eval. · 1987 · 45 · 1184
12. 10.1103/PhysRev.184.70210.1103/PhysRev.184.702 ↗
13. 10.1109/20.21132310.1109/20.211323 ↗
14. R.J. Shapoorabadi, A.N. Sinclair, and A. Konrad, Finite element determination of the absolute magnitude of an ultrasonic pulse produced by an EMAT, in 2000 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Puerto Rico, October (2000)
15. Jian X. · Rev. Progr. QNDE · 2004 · 24 · 1041
16. 10.1080/1058975050003398810.1080/10589750500033988 ↗
17. Hirao M. · 200310.1007/978-1-4757-3743-1 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.212805810.1063/1.2128058 ↗
19. Sophian A. · Insight · 2001 · 43 · 308
20. 10.1063/1.32287210.1063/1.322872 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.34766210.1063/1.347662 ↗
22. 10.1109/58.14317210.1109/58.143172 ↗
23. 10.1109/58.5531410.1109/58.55314 ↗
24. 10.1109/TMAG.1980.106081310.1109/TMAG.1980.1060813 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.sna.2005.07.02610.1016/j.sna.2005.07.026 ↗
26. 10.1109/58.14853710.1109/58.148537 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.sna.2006.01.04810.1016/j.sna.2006.01.048 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.185139310.1063/1.1851393 ↗
29. 10.1109/20.99616110.1109/20.996161 ↗
30. Silvester P.P. · 1983
31. Chari M.V.K. · 2000
32. 10.1109/20.95131710.1109/20.951317 ↗
33. 10.1109/20.10289710.1109/20.102897 ↗
34. Abaqus 6.5.1. Abaqus Analysis users manual, Section 22.2.3 – 2D solid element library
35. S. Soua, A. Raude, and T-H. Gan, Guided wave in engineering structures using non-contact electromagnetic acoustic transducers – A numerical approach for the technique optimisation, Excerpt from the Proceedings of the COMSOL Conference 2009, Milan
36. 10.1063/1.113432210.1063/1.1134322 ↗
37. 10.1121/1.42276010.1121/1.422760 ↗
38. 10.1109/58.75302210.1109/58.753022 ↗
39. 10.1016/0041-624X(88)90042-X10.1016/0041-624X(88)90042-X ↗
40. 10.1121/1.38120810.1121/1.381208 ↗
41. 10.1007/BF0056708910.1007/BF00567089 ↗