Nondestructive testing of concrete using highly nonlinear solitary waves
Source abstract
Abstract
In this article, we describe the capability of a nondestructive evaluation (NDE) method at determining the strength of concrete surfaces. The method uses highly non-linear solitary waves (HNSWs) propagating inside a metamaterial in contact with the concrete to be tested. The metamaterial consists of a chain of spherical particles, and is part of a built-in transducer designed to excite and detect HNSWs. The NDE method exploits the dynamic interaction between the metamaterial and the concrete, and the hypothesis is that this interaction depends on the stiffness of the specimen being inspected. In this study, we tested this hypothesis by assembling two kinds of transducer and by casting cylinders with different water-to-cement ratios. The results show that the time of flight of the HNSWs is inversely proportional to the modulus of elasticity of the concrete. Once fully developed, the proposed NDE method may easily assess concrete surfaces.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory for Nondestructive Evaluation and Structural Health Monitoring Studies, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Funding
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation · Federal Highway Administration · China Scholarship Council
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1201/978142004005010.1201/9781420040050 ↗
2. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/11/11300110.1088/0964-1726/24/11/113001 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.07910.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.079 ↗
4. 10.1617/1385410.1617/13854 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0958-9465(03)00081-710.1016/S0958-9465(03)00081-7 ↗
6. 10.3141/2113-1610.3141/2113-16 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.07010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.070 ↗
8. 10.1016/0958-9465(96)00026-110.1016/0958-9465(96)00026-1 ↗
9. Popovics S · Mater Eval · 2001 · 59 · 123
10. 10.1179/1432891714Z.000000000129610.1179/1432891714Z.0000000001296 ↗
11. Huang Q · ACI Mater J · 2011 · 108 · 403
12. Yılmaz T · Nondestr Test Eval · 2015 · 31 · 1
13. ASTM C805/C805m-08 · Standard test method for rebound number of hardened concrete · 2008
14. 10.1080/10589759.2014.92689710.1080/10589759.2014.926897 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.00610.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.006 ↗
16. 10.1080/10589759.2014.97778910.1080/10589759.2014.977789 ↗
17. 10.1109/TUFFC.2014.00696210.1109/TUFFC.2014.006962 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2015.01.00310.1016/j.ndteint.2015.01.003 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.07.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2014.07.004 ↗
20. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/8/08501610.1088/0964-1726/24/8/085016 ↗
21. 10.2172/122173910.2172/1221739 ↗
22. 10.3390/ma810536810.3390/ma8105368 ↗
23. Cano-Barrita P · ACI Mater J · 2015 · 112 · 147
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.13110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.131 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.01710.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.017 ↗
26. 10.1617/s11527-014-0506-110.1617/s11527-014-0506-1 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.15810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.158 ↗
28. 10.12989/cac.2015.15.5.79510.12989/cac.2015.15.5.795 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.04310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.043 ↗
30. 10.1016/0950-0618(96)00003-710.1016/0950-0618(96)00003-7 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.05310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.053 ↗
32. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/3/03501610.1088/0964-1726/22/3/035016 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.355645510.1063/1.3556455 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.02660110.1103/PhysRevE.84.026601 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.05.00310.1016/j.ndteint.2012.05.003 ↗
36. 10.3390/s14071256810.3390/s140712568 ↗
37. 10.3390/s1601000510.3390/s16010005 ↗
38. 10.3390/app604010410.3390/app6040104 ↗
39. ASTM C469 · Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression · 2014
40. 10.1134/S106378420805002210.1134/S1063784208050022 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.490289910.1063/1.4902899 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.05660610.1103/PhysRevE.79.056606 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.01.01610.1016/j.ultras.2014.01.016 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.01.01510.1016/j.ultras.2012.01.015 ↗
45. 10.1007/s10051005042410.1007/s100510050424 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.04660610.1103/PhysRevE.83.046606 ↗
47. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/1/01500610.1088/0964-1726/24/1/015006 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2015.04.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2015.04.006 ↗
49. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/6/05510.1088/0964-1726/16/6/055 ↗
50. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:3(219)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:3(219) ↗
51. 10.1177/147592170606774210.1177/1475921706067742 ↗
52. 10.12989/sss.2006.2.3.25310.12989/sss.2006.2.3.253 ↗
53. Hertz H · J Reine Angew Math · 1881 · 92 · 156
54. Nesterenko V · Dynamics of heterogeneous materials · 2013
55. 10.1016/0008-8846(86)90106-710.1016/0008-8846(86)90106-7 ↗
56. Popovics J · A study of static and dynamic modulus of elasticity of concrete. ACI-CRC Final Report · 2008