Contemporary ultrasonic signal processing approaches for nondestructive evaluation of multilayered structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Various signal processing techniques have been used for the enhancement of defect detection and defect characterisation. Cross-correlation, filtering, autoregressive analysis, deconvolution, neural network, wavelet transform and sparse signal representations have all been applied in attempts to analyse ultrasonic signals. In ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation (NDE) applications, a large number of materials have multilayered structures. NDE of multilayered structures leads to some specific problems, such as penetration, echo overlap, high attenuation and low signal-to-noise ratio. The signals recorded from a multilayered structure are a class of very special signals comprised of limited echoes. Such signals can be assumed to have a sparse representation in a proper signal dictionary. Recently, a number of digital signal processing techniques have been developed by exploiting the sparse constraint. This paper presents a review of research to date, showing the up-to-date developments of signal processing techniques made in ultrasonic NDE. A few typical ultrasonic signal processing techniques used for NDE of multilayered structures are elaborated. The practical applications and limitations of different signal processing methods in ultrasonic NDE of multilayered structures are analysed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Rose J.L. · Mater. Eval. · 1996 · 54 · 1310
2. 10.1016/S0041-624X(01)00087-710.1016/S0041-624X(01)00087-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.10110.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.101 ↗
4. 10.1177/14759217020010010410.1177/147592170200100104 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.111769410.1126/science.1117694 ↗
6. 10.1109/58.92071310.1109/58.920713 ↗
7. Schmerr L.W. · 199810.1007/978-1-4899-0142-2 ↗
8. 10.1109/TADVP.2005.85355310.1109/TADVP.2005.853553 ↗
9. 10.1002/ima.2005710.1002/ima.20057 ↗
10. Kinsler L.E. · 1982
11. 10.1109/58.47655010.1109/58.476550 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.07.00510.1016/j.ultras.2006.07.005 ↗
13. Neal S.P. · J. Acoust. Soc. Am. · 1989 · 86 · 94
14. 10.1088/0959-7174/1/1/00810.1088/0959-7174/1/1/008 ↗
15. 10.1109/58.29410210.1109/58.294102 ↗
16. 10.1109/58.33026510.1109/58.330265 ↗
17. 10.1109/58.77565410.1109/58.775654 ↗
18. 10.1109/58.30849310.1109/58.308493 ↗
19. 10.1109/58.64691210.1109/58.646912 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00202-010.1016/S0041-624X(02)00202-0 ↗
21. 10.1109/58.6846810.1109/58.68468 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.17410.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.174 ↗
23. 10.1109/58.13912610.1109/58.139126 ↗
24. 10.1109/58.58518610.1109/58.585186 ↗
25. 10.1121/1.298241410.1121/1.2982414 ↗
26. G. Wu, J. Su, D. Zhu, W. Sheng, and Y. Li, Ultrasonic NDE of thin composite plate based on an enhanced Wigner–Ville distribution, in 17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing, Shanghai, China, 2008
27. 10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00063-310.1016/S0963-8695(00)00063-3 ↗
28. 10.1109/58.67760610.1109/58.677606 ↗
29. Ramuhalli P. · Mater. Eval. · 2000 · 58 · 65
30. 10.1109/TUFFC.2002.102602510.1109/TUFFC.2002.1026025 ↗
31. Mandayam S. · 2001 · 20 · 1210
32. Rose J.L. · Mater. Eval. · 1984 · 42 · 98
33. Rose J.L. · Mater. Eval. · 1984 · 42 · 433
34. 10.1016/0041-624X(88)90002-910.1016/0041-624X(88)90002-9 ↗
35. Burch S.F. · Br. J. Nondestr. Test. · 1990 · 32 · 347
36. 10.1109/58.50371910.1109/58.503719 ↗
37. Berry D. · 1991 · 10 · 659
38. Brown L.M. · 1991 · 10 · 705
39. Y. Guez, K.D. Donohoue, and N.M. Bilgutay, A neural networks architecture for ultrasonic nondestructive testing, IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, Orlando, USA, 1991
40. T. Stepinski and F. Lingvall, Automatic defect characterisation in ultrasonic NDT, in 15th World Conference on NDT, Rome, 2000
41. 10.1016/0963-8695(95)00053-410.1016/0963-8695(95)00053-4 ↗
42. Simone G. · Int. J. Appl. Electromagnet. Mech. · 2002 · 15 · 29110.3233/JAE-2002-462 ↗
43. Windsor C.G. · Insight · 1993 · 35 · 15
44. 10.1007/BF0056829010.1007/BF00568290 ↗
45. 10.1109/72.15905910.1109/72.159059 ↗
46. 10.1109/5326.98393310.1109/5326.983933 ↗
47. 10.1109/72.80908010.1109/72.809080 ↗
48. 10.1109/TUFFC.2004.132440310.1109/TUFFC.2004.1324403 ↗
49. 10.1023/A:100971592355510.1023/A:1009715923555 ↗
50. 10.1784/insi.46.6.331.5639010.1784/insi.46.6.331.56390 ↗
51. 10.1007/BF0035026510.1007/BF00350265 ↗
52. 10.1121/1.145107110.1121/1.1451071 ↗
53. 10.1115/1.149127210.1115/1.1491272 ↗
54. 10.1784/insi.46.9.537.4083810.1784/insi.46.9.537.40838 ↗
55. 10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00407-910.1016/S0041-624X(02)00407-9 ↗
56. 10.1109/TUFFC.2005.150402010.1109/TUFFC.2005.1504020 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.03.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2006.03.006 ↗
58. 10.1121/1.157574610.1121/1.1575746 ↗
59. 10.1121/1.221540710.1121/1.2215407 ↗
60. 10.1016/0041-624X(82)90003-810.1016/0041-624X(82)90003-8 ↗
61. 10.1109/58.24820810.1109/58.248208 ↗
62. Bilgutay V.M. · IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control · 1989 · 37 · 1590
63. 10.1109/58.47655110.1109/58.476551 ↗
64. Pagodinas D. · Ultragarsas · 2002 · 45 · 47
65. Mallat S. · 1999
66. 10.1214/aos/102469108110.1214/aos/1024691081 ↗
67. 10.1093/biomet/81.3.42510.1093/biomet/81.3.425 ↗
68. 10.1111/1467-9868.0007110.1111/1467-9868.00071 ↗
69. 10.1016/S0041-624X(00)00043-310.1016/S0041-624X(00)00043-3 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.microrel.2005.07.00810.1016/j.microrel.2005.07.008 ↗
71. Han J.B. · Mater. Eval. 57 · 1999 · 837
72. 10.1080/1058975070132789010.1080/10589750701327890 ↗
73. Cardoso G. · IEEE Ultrason. Symp. · 2003 · 1 · 250
74. 10.1109/19.85038810.1109/19.850388 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.10110.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.101 ↗
76. Jollife I.T. · 2002
77. 10.1109/TAC.1981.110256810.1109/TAC.1981.1102568 ↗
78. Haykin S. · 2008
79. Khelil M. · Proc. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. · 2005 · 9 · 226
80. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2003.10.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2003.10.007 ↗
81. 10.1002/047122131710.1002/0471221317 ↗
82. 10.1162/08997669930001686310.1162/089976699300016863 ↗
83. 10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.112910.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129 ↗
84. 10.1016/0165-1684(94)90029-910.1016/0165-1684(94)90029-9 ↗
85. 10.1162/neco.1997.9.7.148310.1162/neco.1997.9.7.1483 ↗
86. 10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00026-510.1016/S0893-6080(00)00026-5 ↗
87. 10.1162/15324430376896608510.1162/153244303768966085 ↗
88. 10.1784/insi.45.11.740.5295810.1784/insi.45.11.740.52958 ↗
89. Liu Q. · J. X-ray Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 14 · 21
90. Salazar A. · 200610.1007/11679363_51 ↗
91. 10.1109/TIP.2006.88196910.1109/TIP.2006.881969 ↗
92. 10.1109/78.25808210.1109/78.258082 ↗
93. 10.1007/BF0267843010.1007/BF02678430 ↗
94. 10.1109/TSP.2007.91612410.1109/TSP.2007.916124 ↗
95. 10.1109/TIT.2004.83479310.1109/TIT.2004.834793 ↗
96. S.S. Chen, Basis pursuit, Ph.D. thesis, The Department of Statistics, Stanford University, 1995
97. 10.1073/pnas.043784710010.1073/pnas.0437847100 ↗
98. 10.1109/78.73825110.1109/78.738251 ↗
99. 10.1109/TSP.2004.83101610.1109/TSP.2004.831016 ↗
100. 10.1162/08997660030001582610.1162/089976600300015826 ↗