journal article·2024-05-18

A study on the efficacy of modal acoustic emission technique for health monitoring of structures with different geometries

Parikshit Roy, Aloke Kumar Datta, Pijush Topdar

Publisher page

Abstract

Health monitoring of structures is a fertile field of research. Different techniques are being developed through research to perform the health monitoring on different types of structures. Acoustic emission (AE) technique is considered to be promising, as this technique can be used for damage detection in real time. However, AE technique has some limitations as far as geometry of structure is concerned. Here in this study, modal AE (MAE) technique has been explored through experimental investigation in laboratory for its possible, effective applications in the health monitoring of structures with different geometries, namely, plates and truss. MAE technique is adopted as it facilitates an analysis of structural behaviour under the application of an AE source along with source localisation. Further, a methodology is proposed to minimise the effects of geometry and boundaries/edges. The methodology is based on identifying the front part of the time-frequency representation (TFR) diagram, i.e. first few energetic zones in the TFR, of an AE signal, followed by the alignment of these zones with respect to the contour of the group velocity curves of Lamb modes. The efficacy of the proposed method for damage localisation has been verified and found to be promising.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Civil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology Durgapur, Durgapur, India

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s40857-021-00219-410.1007/s40857-021-00219-4 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.01.00810.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.01.008 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2005.12.00410.1016/j.ijpvp.2005.12.004 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10704510.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107045 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.02010.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.020 ↗
6. 10.1007/s13349-020-00433-010.1007/s13349-020-00433-0 ↗
7. 10.1080/10589759.2021.187437610.1080/10589759.2021.1874376 ↗
8. 10.3390/app704033910.3390/app7040339 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.06.03410.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.06.034 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.05.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.05.004 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.09510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.095 ↗
12. 10.3390/app806095810.3390/app8060958 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10714610.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107146 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.microrel.2021.11441110.1016/j.microrel.2021.114411 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.microrel.2018.06.07410.1016/j.microrel.2018.06.074 ↗
16. Gorman MR, Prosser WH. AE source orientation by plate wave analysis. J Acoust Emiss. 1991;9(4):283–288.
17. 10.1121/1.40125810.1121/1.401258 ↗
18. 10.1016/0041-624X(91)90063-E10.1016/0041-624X(91)90063-E ↗
19. Hamstad MA, Downs KS. On characterization and location of acoustic emission sources in real size composite structures: a waveform study. J Acoust Emiss. 1995;13(1–2):31–41.
20. Ziola S. Digital signal processing of modal acoustic emission signals. J Acoust Emiss. 1996;14(3–4):S12–S18.
21. 10.1016/S0963-8695(98)00077-210.1016/S0963-8695(98)00077-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)01142-310.1016/S0921-5093(98)01142-3 ↗
23. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.167-168.16210.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.167-168.162 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.03.00910.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.03.009 ↗
25. 10.1002/stc.22010.1002/stc.220 ↗
26. 10.1002/stc.201110.1002/stc.2011 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.06.00910.1016/j.ultras.2013.06.009 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0963-8695(96)00033-310.1016/S0963-8695(96)00033-3 ↗
29. Suzuki H, Kinjo T, Hayashi Y, et al. Wavelet transform of acoustic emission signals. J Acoust Emiss. 1996;14:69–84.
30. 10.1016/S0963-8695(98)00029-210.1016/S0963-8695(98)00029-2 ↗
31. 10.1109/58.84204810.1109/58.842048 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00079-910.1016/S0263-8223(00)00079-9 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00056-610.1016/S0963-8695(00)00056-6 ↗
34. Yamada H, Mizutani Y, Nishino H, et al. Lamb wave source location of impact on anisotropic plates. J Acoust Emiss. 2000;18:51.
35. Hamstad M, O’gallagher A, Gary J. A wavelet transform applied to acoustic emission: part 1: source identification. J Acoust Emiss. 2002;20:39–61.
36. Hamstad M, O’gallagher A, Gary J. A wavelet transform applied to acoustic emission signals: part 2: source location. J Acoust Emiss. 2002;20:62–82.
37. Aljets D, Chong A, Wilcox S, et al. Acoustic emission source location in plate-like structures using a closely arranged triangular sensor array. J Acoust Emiss. 2010;28:85–98.
38. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.01.01210.1016/j.ymssp.2012.01.012 ↗
39. 10.1007/s40857-020-00208-z10.1007/s40857-020-00208-z ↗
40. 10.4236/jst.2015.5100210.4236/jst.2015.51002 ↗
41. Teng F, Li DY, Gao GL. The mode of lamb wave transmitting in thin aluminum alloy plate. NDT. 2009;31:433–437.
42. 10.1080/10589759.2020.178544710.1080/10589759.2020.1785447 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.acha.2010.08.00210.1016/j.acha.2010.08.002 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.04.01410.1016/j.apacoust.2017.04.014 ↗
45. Hamstad MA, O’Gallagher A, Gary J. Effects of lateral plate dimensions on acoustic emission signals from dipole sources. J Acoust Emiss. 2001;19:258–274.
46. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/8/08503510.1088/0964-1726/25/8/085035 ↗
47. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa78de10.1088/1361-665X/aa78de ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.03.00610.1016/j.ultras.2017.03.006 ↗
49. Hsu NN, Breckenridge FR. Characterization and calibration of acoustic emission sensors. Mater Eval. 1981;39:60–68.
50. 10.1115/1.289600910.1115/1.2896009 ↗
51. AGU-Vallen Wavelet available at https://www.vallen.de/products/software/.
52. 10.1002/stc.41310.1002/stc.413 ↗
53. Dispersion Calculator Version 1.7 available at https://www.dlr.de/zlp/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-14332/24874_read-61142/
54. 10.1121/1.508229910.1121/1.5082299 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2012.11.02910.1016/j.sigpro.2012.11.029 ↗
56. 10.1177/147592171774233910.1177/1475921717742339 ↗
57. 10.1177/147592172092279710.1177/1475921720922797 ↗
58. 10.1177/147592172097704110.1177/1475921720977041 ↗
59. 10.1115/1.400078910.1115/1.4000789 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.08.02810.1016/j.ymssp.2015.08.028 ↗
61. 10.1088/1742-2140/aaacad10.1088/1742-2140/aaacad ↗
62. 10.1080/10589759.2016.124125210.1080/10589759.2016.1241252 ↗
63. Ono K, Cho H, Matsuo T. Transfer functions of acoustic emission sensors. J Acoust Emiss. 2008;26:72–90.
64. Sause MG. Investigation of pencil-lead breaks as acoustic emission sources. J Acoust Emiss. 2011;29:184–196.