journal article·2025-08-03

Experimental validation of an efficient strategy for FE model updating and damage identification in tubular structures

Parsa Ghannadi, Seyed Sina Kourehli, Andy Nguyen

Publisher page

Abstract

Early identification of damages in tubular structures is crucial for their long-term safety and functionality, as they are essential in various modern life applications. Experimental and numerical modal data may slightly differ due to unknown structural characteristics and uncertainties, which are typically addressed using finite element (FE) model updating procedures. Instead of using the Euler-Bernoulli beam element, this paper utilises the semi-rigidly connected frame element (S-RCFE). By incorporating extra design parameters, such as the end fixity factor of all connections, the S-RCFE offers a unique opportunity to establish a strong agreement between experimental and numerical models through an optimisation-based FE model updating procedure. A well-calibrated FE model represents the actual behaviour of the structure and leads to achieving accurate results in the damage detection step. This paper employs the improved grey wolf optimiser (IGWO) and weIghted meaN oF vectOrs (INFO) to minimise 11 objective functions with adjustable coefficients. The statistical investigations reveal that the IGWO effectively minimised five out of six objective functions, which were defined based on the modified total modal assurance criterion (MTMAC). The rest of the objective functions based on the modal assurance criterion (MAC), natural frequency vector assurance criterion (NFVAC), differences in natural frequencies, and a combination of the MAC and NFVAC could not obtain accurate outcomes for the model updating problem. The statistical comparison indicates that the INFO algorithm is unreliable for the FE model updating despite achieving at least one successful result in ten independent runs. The INFO algorithm and the IGWO algorithm demonstrate comparable performance in damage detection. The analysis also shows that the coefficients of MTMAC, alpha and beta, should be adjusted to 0.65 and 1, respectively, to achieve the most accurate damage detection result.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Islamic Azad University

Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University

University of Southern Queensland

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.11584510.1016/j.jsv.2020.115845 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10489-022-04188-710.1007/s10489-022-04188-7 ↗
3. 10.3390/app710104010.3390/app7101040 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10725410.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107254 ↗
5. 10.1177/1475921721105233510.1177/14759217211052335 ↗
6. 10.1080/10589759.2022.213750810.1080/10589759.2022.2137508 ↗
7. 10.1142/S021945541250021610.1142/S0219455412500216 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.08.00110.1016/j.ymssp.2009.08.001 ↗
9. 10.3390/s2217665410.3390/s22176654 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11525410.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115254 ↗
11. 10.1115/1.402697310.1115/1.4026973 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.09.00710.1016/j.ymssp.2007.09.007 ↗
13. 10.1177/136943322094719310.1177/1369433220947193 ↗
14. 10.1007/s13349-019-00345-810.1007/s13349-019-00345-8 ↗
15. Kourehli SS. Prediction of unmeasured mode shapes and structural damage detection using least squares support vector machine. Struct Monit Maint. 2018;5(3):379–390.
16. 10.1002/stc.18310.1002/stc.183 ↗
17. 10.7158/S12-040.2014.15.110.7158/S12-040.2014.15.1 ↗
18. 10.1080/10589759.2018.151844510.1080/10589759.2018.1518445 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.11718710.1016/j.jsv.2022.117187 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.11355110.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113551 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.10802310.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108023 ↗
22. 10.1002/stc.255010.1002/stc.2550 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000085510.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000855 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12439310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124393 ↗
25. 10.1177/147592171036541910.1177/1475921710365419 ↗
26. 10.1007/978-3-030-72192-3_610.1007/978-3-030-72192-3_6 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10707710.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107077 ↗
28. 10.3390/s2214507910.3390/s22145079 ↗
29. 10.1111/mice.1242410.1111/mice.12424 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.04110.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.041 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10518-023-01670-610.1007/s10518-023-01670-6 ↗
32. 10.1007/s11831-015-9150-310.1007/s11831-015-9150-3 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.apm.2016.07.01510.1016/j.apm.2016.07.015 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.29510.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.295 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11831-018-9273-410.1007/s11831-018-9273-4 ↗
36. 10.3390/s2011331510.3390/s20113315 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10518-023-01615-z10.1007/s10518-023-01615-z ↗
38. 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.62.3210.3221/IGF-ESIS.62.32 ↗
39. 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.64.0410.3221/IGF-ESIS.64.04 ↗
40. 10.1201/9781003306924-210.1201/9781003306924-2 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.43910.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.439 ↗
42. 10.3390/e2307087410.3390/e23070874 ↗
43. Nayak J, et al. Nature inspired optimization and its application to engineering. 2021. Springer. p. 1–3.
44. Ghannadi P, Kourehli SS. Structural damage detection based on MAC flexibility and frequency using moth-flame algorithm. Struct Eng Mech. 2019;70(6):649–659.
45. Ghannadi P, Kourehli SS. Model updating and damage detection in multi-story shear frames using salp swarm algorithm. Earthquakes Struct. 2019;17(1):63–73.
46. 10.1002/tal.177710.1002/tal.1777 ↗
47. 10.1002/tal.196710.1002/tal.1967 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.10337410.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103374 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.10327610.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103276 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.10336310.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103363 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.10339910.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103399 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.apm.2020.06.03910.1016/j.apm.2020.06.039 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10621110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106211 ↗
54. 10.1142/S021945540800265X10.1142/S021945540800265X ↗
55. 10.1260/1369-4332.16.1.5110.1260/1369-4332.16.1.51 ↗
56. 10.1007/978-3-030-12184-6_1210.1007/978-3-030-12184-6_12 ↗
57. 10.1007/978-981-16-0945-9_2110.1007/978-981-16-0945-9_21 ↗
58. Seguini M, et al. Crack identification in pipe using improved artificial neural network. In: Recent Advances in Structural Health Monitoring and Engineering Structures: Select Proceedings of SHM and ES 2022. Springer; 2022. p. 15–25.
59. Seguini M, et al. Crack prediction in pipeline using ANN-PSO based on numerical and experimental modal analysis. Smart Struct Syst. 2021;27(3):507–523.
60. 10.1177/147592171987562810.1177/1475921719875628 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.marstruc.2022.10334210.1016/j.marstruc.2022.103342 ↗
62. Abdullahi A, Wang Y. Digital twin-like Model updating of a laboratory offshore wind turbine with few-parameters soil-structure interaction Model. 2021. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure; Porto, Portugal.
63. 10.1002/stc.287210.1002/stc.2872 ↗
64. 10.1177/136943322092100010.1177/1369433220921000 ↗
65. 10.1007/s00158-022-03270-510.1007/s00158-022-03270-5 ↗
66. Ghannadi P, Kourehli SS. Investigation of the accuracy of different finite element model reduction techniques. Struct Monit Maint. 2018;5(3):417–428.
67. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10668810.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106688 ↗
68. 10.1002/stc.264710.1002/stc.2647 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.renene.2021.09.02210.1016/j.renene.2021.09.022 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.10897510.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108975 ↗
71. 10.12989/sem.2010.34.3.35110.12989/sem.2010.34.3.351 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.amc.2014.05.11510.1016/j.amc.2014.05.115 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11202910.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112029 ↗
74. 10.1007/s11709-021-0739-310.1007/s11709-021-0739-3 ↗
75. 10.1142/S021945542250056010.1142/S0219455422500560 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.02.00810.1016/j.istruc.2023.02.008 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.10292310.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102923 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.11737310.1016/j.jsv.2022.117373 ↗
79. 10.1080/17415977.2013.82341310.1080/17415977.2013.823413 ↗
80. Xue-Lin P. Condition monitoring of offshore pipelines using vibration based methods [doctoral thesis]. The University of Western Australia, School of Civil and Resource Engineering; 2012.
81. Hernández González I. Damage identification of large-scale structures using surrogate kriging models and particle swarm algorithms [master’s thesis]. University of Granada, Department of Structural Mechanics and Hydraulic Engineering; 2022.
82. 10.3390/buildings1207095810.3390/buildings12070958 ↗
83. 10.3390/app712124510.3390/app7121245 ↗
84. 10.1080/0305215X.2017.136739210.1080/0305215X.2017.1367392 ↗
85. 10.1155/2018/318306710.1155/2018/3183067 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.07.00310.1016/j.compstruc.2008.07.003 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.55110.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.551 ↗
88. Chopra AK. Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, USA: Pearson Education; 2007.
89. 10.1177/1045389X0935033210.1177/1045389X09350332 ↗
90. Hofmeister B. Vibration-based damage localisation: impulse response identification and model updating methods [doctoral thesis]. Mitteilungen des Instituts für Statik und Dynamik der Leibniz Universität Hannover; 2023.
91. 10.1016/B978-0-12-416743-8.00014-210.1016/B978-0-12-416743-8.00014-2 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.02310.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.023 ↗
93. 10.15446/dyna.v88n218.9169310.15446/dyna.v88n218.91693 ↗
94. 10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00118-910.1016/S0141-0296(02)00118-9 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.11651610.1016/j.eswa.2022.116516 ↗
96. 10.1007/s00500-023-08092-110.1007/s00500-023-08092-1 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.00710.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.11391710.1016/j.eswa.2020.113917 ↗
99. Esu OE. Vibration-based indicators for damage identification in axisymmetric structures. University of Surrey. 2022.
100. 10.1088/1742-6596/842/1/01203410.1088/1742-6596/842/1/012034 ↗