journal article·2023-01-22

Terahertz based Thickness Measurement of Thermal Barrier Coatings Using Hybrid Machine Learning

Yunli Gong, Binghua Cao, Hong Zhang, Fengshan Sun, Mengbao Fan

Publisher page

Abstract

Thickness of thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) is closely related to the performance of hot-section components in aero-engine. In this paper, a model of Elman neural network optimised by whale optimisation algorithm (WOA) with principal component analysis (PCA) based on singular value decomposition (SVD) was proposed for terahertz (THz)-based thickness measurement of TBCs. First of all, the theoretical model of THz propagation in TBC is employed to generate simulated signals to meet the demand of sample size for Elman neural network training. Second, PCA based on SVD is used to reduce the dimension of each signal. In order to decrease the possibility of falling into local optimisation and improve the output accuracy of neural network, the weights and biases of network are optimised by WOA. Finally, the performance of the models was evaluated by statistical assessments. Our results show that the thickness measurement method combined with hybrid machine learning adopted in this paper have improved the accuracy of thickness measurement and occupied great potential applications on thickness measurement of TBCs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Terahertz technology and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Nondestructive Testing (Fujian Polytechnic Normal University), Fujian Province University, Fuzhou, China

School of Information and Control Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China

School of Mechatronic Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.106860910.1126/science.1068609 ↗
2. 10.1557/mrs2003.19410.1557/mrs2003.194 ↗
3. 10.1080/10589759.2022.206666510.1080/10589759.2022.2066665 ↗
4. 10.1179/1743280413Y.000000001910.1179/1743280413Y.0000000019 ↗
5. 10.3390/coatings1209131810.3390/coatings12091318 ↗
6. Takahashi R · J Mater Res Technol · 2022 · 19 · 493210.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.037 ↗
7. 10.1364/AO.55.00369510.1364/AO.55.003695 ↗
8. 10.1080/10589759.2019.160560310.1080/10589759.2019.1605603 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.09.00510.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.09.005 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ultras.2019.10598110.1016/j.ultras.2019.105981 ↗
11. 10.3390/s1805163010.3390/s18051630 ↗
12. 10.1080/10589759.2022.210216710.1080/10589759.2022.2102167 ↗
13. Huang R · IEEE Trans Instrum Measur · 2022 · 71 · 1
14. Bennett TD · Surf Coat Technol · 2015 · 261 · 10210.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.11.051 ↗
15. 10.1080/10589759.2022.206386010.1080/10589759.2022.2063860 ↗
16. 10.1080/10589759.2012.69488210.1080/10589759.2012.694882 ↗
17. Zhai M · NDT E Int · 2020 · 116 · 10235810.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102358 ↗
18. 10.1088/1361-6463/ac569810.1088/1361-6463/ac5698 ↗
19. White J · AIP · 2009 · 1096 · 43410.1063/1.3114273 ↗
20. 10.1109/TTHZ.2018.286726510.1109/TTHZ.2018.2867265 ↗
21. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.295867410.1109/JSEN.2019.2958674 ↗
22. 10.1109/TTHZ.2022.316435310.1109/TTHZ.2022.3164353 ↗
23. 10.1109/TII.2021.309879110.1109/TII.2021.3098791 ↗
24. 10.1109/TII.2022.321782910.1109/TII.2022.3217829 ↗
25. 10.1080/10589759.2019.166290110.1080/10589759.2019.1662901 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.12.05110.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.12.051 ↗
27. 10.1364/OE.40404210.1364/OE.404042 ↗
28. 10.1364/AO.39274810.1364/AO.392748 ↗
29. 10.3390/coatings1009080510.3390/coatings10090805 ↗
30. Cao B · Mater Eval · 2021 · 79 · 125
31. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.00810.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008 ↗
32. An B · IEEE Trans Instrum Measur · 2022 · 71 · 1