RSSI-based location fingerprint method for RFID indoor positioning: a review
Source abstract
Abstract
The RSSI-based location fingerprinting method is currently a hot and challenging area of research in indoor positioning algorithms, which uses the degree of signal attenuation during spatial propagation to build a database, match data and ultimately determine the target location. This paper introduces and compares common indoor positioning techniques and algorithms, and elaborates on positioning algorithm improvement methods including signal filtering methods, received signal clustering algorithms and location fingerprint matching optimisation algorithms. Through a comparative analysis of the characteristics of the improved algorithms, a reference direction is provided for the selection of suitable improved location fingerprint fusion algorithms to improve positioning accuracy and efficiency in complex environments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies · Radio Wave Propagation Studies · Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computer Science, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan, China
Funding
Scientific Project of CAFU · Civil Aviation Professional Project · Sichuan Education Reform Project · Central University Education Reform Project · Sichuan Science and Technology
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.27014/d.cnki.gdnau.2019.00020710.27014/d.cnki.gdnau.2019.000207 ↗
2. 10.27351/d.cnki.gszhu.2018.00029810.27351/d.cnki.gszhu.2018.000298 ↗
3. Han ML, Liu Y. Comparison of RFID positioning technology and common algorithms. Ind Technol Forum. 2014;12(1):89–91.
4. 10.1007/s10776-016-0311-610.1007/s10776-016-0311-6 ↗
5. 10.3390/s1601000410.3390/s16010004 ↗
6. 10.1109/comst.2016.263242710.1109/comst.2016.2632427 ↗
7. Tao S. Research on filtering and positioning algorithm of WSN node ranging data based on phase difference ranging. Electron Des Eng. 2017;7:35–40.
8. 10.1109/tie.2014.230173710.1109/tie.2014.2301737 ↗
9. Ma N. Research on RFID indoor wireless location algorithm based on RSSI [MA thesis]. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China; 2012. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201301&filename=1012470985.nh.
10. 10.1145/1435473.143547510.1145/1435473.1435475 ↗
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.971-973.154710.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.971-973.1547 ↗
12. 10.14004/j.cnki.ckt.2019.362110.14004/j.cnki.ckt.2019.3621 ↗
13. Qiao GZ, Zeng J. An improved RSSI localisation method for dynamic environments. Comput Res Dev. 2010;S2:111–114.1.
14. Li Y, He X, Liu S. A wireless positioning method based on real-time estimation of path loss model parameters. J Sens Technol. 2010;23(9):1328–1333.
15. 10.4103/0377-2063.12375510.4103/0377-2063.123755 ↗
16. 10.16652/j.issn.1004-373x.2013.20.02010.16652/j.issn.1004-373x.2013.20.020 ↗
17. Henry W. Research and implementation of indoor location algorithm for wireless sensor networks based on RSSI. Beijing: Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications; 2010.
18. Xiao JN. Hybrid filtering algorithm based on RSSI. Comput Sci. 2019;46(8):133–137.
19. Zhu M, Zhang HQ. Research on indoor ranging model based on RSSI. Sens Microsys. 2010;8:19–22.
20. Wan Q, Guo X. Method and application of indoor positioning. Beijing: Electronic Industry Press; 2012.
21. Dong YY. Research on three-dimensional spatial positioning technology under WiFi network. Beijing: Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications; 2012.
22. James Z, Zhao H, G SP, et al. Location algorithm of equilateral triangle based on RSSI mean. J Northeast Univ Nat Sci Ed. 1094–1097. CNKI:SUN:DBDX.0.2007-08-008
23. 10.1115/1.366255210.1115/1.3662552 ↗
24. 10.14022/j.cnki.dzsjgc.2017.02.01110.14022/j.cnki.dzsjgc.2017.02.011 ↗
25. 10.1109/WiMob.2009.3010.1109/WiMob.2009.30 ↗
26. Ai H, Li Y. Weighted centroid localization algorithm based on RSSI ranging filter optimization. Comput Eng Des. 2017;38(10):2631–2635.
27. Shan HM, Chen CX. Artificial Bee Colony localization algorithm based on RSSI Gaussian filter. J Sens Technol. 2021;34(7):979–983. CNKI:SUN:CGJS.0.2021-07-020
28. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.273.50510.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.273.505 ↗
29. 10.13800/j.cnki.xakjdxxb.2020.012210.13800/j.cnki.xakjdxxb.2020.0122 ↗
30. 10.3390/s2123808610.3390/s21238086 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11227-020-03272-410.1007/s11227-020-03272-4 ↗
32. Wang JQ, Dai Y, Lei QF. Indoor localization algorithm of RSSI filtering by Dixon test. J Sens Technol. 2021;34(1):118–123. CNKI:SUN:CGJS.0.2021-01-018
33. 10.19392/j.cnki.1671-7341.20192809410.19392/j.cnki.1671-7341.201928094 ↗
34. 10.13440/j.slxy.1674-0033.2022.06.00910.13440/j.slxy.1674-0033.2022.06.009 ↗
35. Zhu QY, Ma XZ. Improved clustering algorithm for trilateration in wireless sensor networks. J Shandong Agric Univ. 2019;50(3):473–476.
36. Liu X. Research on indoor fingerprint map location algorithm based on RSSI [MA thesis]. North Univ China. 2019. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201902&filename=1019098806.nh.
37. 10.1109/ICOIN48656.2020.901662710.1109/ICOIN48656.2020.9016627 ↗
38. 10.1109/ICRIS.2019.0011310.1109/ICRIS.2019.00113 ↗
39. 10.16652/j.issn.1004-373x.2022.07.03110.16652/j.issn.1004-373x.2022.07.031 ↗
40. 10.19850/j.cnki.2096-4706.2021.15.01010.19850/j.cnki.2096-4706.2021.15.010 ↗
41. Du JX, Chen YW, Zhang J. Distance correction indoor positioning algorithm based on cluster analysis optimization. Comput Eng Sci. 2018;40(2):246–254.
42. 10.1109/WF-IoT.2018.835522810.1109/WF-IoT.2018.8355228 ↗
43. 10.13440/j.slxy.1674-0033.2022.06.00910.13440/j.slxy.1674-0033.2022.06.009 ↗
44. 10.13382/j.jemi.2018.10.01110.13382/j.jemi.2018.10.011 ↗
45. Mao KJ, Wu JB, Jin HB. Indoor location algorithm for NLOS environment. J Electron. 2016;44(5):1174–1179.
46. 10.1126/science.124207210.1126/science.1242072 ↗
47. Gao SY. Research on subarea clustering indoor location algorithm based on improved affinity propagation clustering algorithm. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology; 2019. pp. 1–64.
48. 10.1080/10589759.2020.180386010.1080/10589759.2020.1803860 ↗
49. 10.1007/s10776-011-0133-510.1007/s10776-011-0133-5 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.06610.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.066 ↗
51. 10.48550/arXiv.1308.085010.48550/arXiv.1308.0850 ↗
52. Jozefowicz R, Zaremba W, Sutskever I. An empirical exploration of recurrent network architectures. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR. 2015;2342–2350.
53. 10.1016/j.cie.2012.10.00710.1016/j.cie.2012.10.007 ↗
54. 10.3233/AIS-17042110.3233/AIS-170421 ↗
55. 10.1109/ICISCE48695.2019.0003710.1109/ICISCE48695.2019.00037 ↗
56. 10.1109/GCCE53005.2021.962202110.1109/GCCE53005.2021.9622021 ↗
57. 10.1109/ICAIIC51459.2021.941520710.1109/ICAIIC51459.2021.9415207 ↗
58. 10.1109/CCWC.2019.866647610.1109/CCWC.2019.8666476 ↗
59. 10.27157/d.cnki.ghzku.2020.00044610.27157/d.cnki.ghzku.2020.000446 ↗
60. 10.1109/JEEIT.2019.871750910.1109/JEEIT.2019.8717509 ↗
61. 10.1109/LCOMM.2020.299990410.1109/LCOMM.2020.2999904 ↗
62. 10.1109/GLOCOM.2017.825455610.1109/GLOCOM.2017.8254556 ↗
63. 10.1080/10589759.2023.224300410.1080/10589759.2023.2243004 ↗
64. 10.16208/j.issn1000-7024.2015.11.02610.16208/j.issn1000-7024.2015.11.026 ↗
65. 10.13873/J.1000-9787(2022)07-0126-0410.13873/J.1000-9787(2022)07-0126-04 ↗
66. Fan JC, Deng ZL, Jiao JC DBSCAN-SVM fusion clustering algorithm based on location fingerprint. Proceedings of the 8th China Satellite Navigation Academic Annual Conference-S10 Multi-source fusion navigation technology; Shanghai,China. 2017. p. 36–39. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=lDUDaiPi9qeCSIZ8ZruGoMTpUWqWn02N7MBsDvVGA-xkxVy_CnwVYP-YNulSmaOE4Hrd0EzlVEUdg0KRVj0W_dvzHoBOOSwwyw_K_mupgG4T7CtaUfoQZOSOjoyZfzW8xxIOY9iL4R4=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS.
67. 10.1109/JIOT.2019.294036810.1109/JIOT.2019.2940368 ↗
68. 10.3390/s2104111410.3390/s21041114 ↗
69. 10.1080/08839514.2017.131659210.1080/08839514.2017.1316592 ↗
70. 10.1080/10589759.2022.203073510.1080/10589759.2022.2030735 ↗
71. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.305256710.1109/ACCESS.2021.3052567 ↗
72. 10.3390/s1908179010.3390/s19081790 ↗
73. 10.1109/ICCSNT.2015.749070610.1109/ICCSNT.2015.7490706 ↗
74. Li ZH, Huang JS. GPS surveying and data processing. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press; 2005.
75. 10.1007/s10291-016-0594-110.1007/s10291-016-0594-1 ↗
76. 10.16452/j.cnki.sdkjzk.2020.03.00310.16452/j.cnki.sdkjzk.2020.03.003 ↗
77. 10.1109/JRFID.2022.317962010.1109/JRFID.2022.3179620 ↗
78. 10.1109/WF-IoT.2015.738908110.1109/WF-IoT.2015.7389081 ↗
79. 10.1109/ITSC.2016.779596210.1109/ITSC.2016.7795962 ↗
80. 10.1109/DTIS.2019.873501610.1109/DTIS.2019.8735016 ↗
81. 10.1109/ISCIT.2006.33986310.1109/ISCIT.2006.339863 ↗
82. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.293783110.1109/ACCESS.2019.2937831 ↗
83. 10.1109/CANDARW.2018.0005010.1109/CANDARW.2018.00050 ↗
84. 10.1109/JSYST.2019.291867810.1109/JSYST.2019.2918678 ↗
85. 10.1155/2019/428385710.1155/2019/4283857 ↗
86. 10.1371/journal.pone.020539210.1371/journal.pone.0205392 ↗
87. 10.1109/ICUFN55119.2022.982965310.1109/ICUFN55119.2022.9829653 ↗
88. 10.1109/ITNEC48623.2020.908505010.1109/ITNEC48623.2020.9085050 ↗
89. 10.1109/APCC55198.2022.994366310.1109/APCC55198.2022.9943663 ↗
90. 10.1080/10095020.2023.217833410.1080/10095020.2023.2178334 ↗
91. 10.1080/01969722.2022.213762210.1080/01969722.2022.2137622 ↗
92. 10.1109/5GWF52925.2021.0004710.1109/5GWF52925.2021.00047 ↗
93. 10.1186/s41044-018-0031-210.1186/s41044-018-0031-2 ↗
94. 10.1109/JAS.2017.751050810.1109/JAS.2017.7510508 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.02.05510.1016/j.neucom.2016.02.055 ↗
96. 10.1109/ICWCUCA.2012.640249210.1109/ICWCUCA.2012.6402492 ↗
97. 10.3390/en1211221210.3390/en12112212 ↗
98. 10.1109/JSEN.2017.266052210.1109/JSEN.2017.2660522 ↗
99. 10.3390/s2312548010.3390/s23125480 ↗
100. 10.3390/app12211106510.3390/app122111065 ↗