journal article·2026-08

CADER: CAD-constrained elastic registration for voxel-accurate sparse-view 3D surface reconstruction in minutes

Hristo Valtchanov, Weiqiang Liu, Sadaival Singh, Josselin Paccoud, Ammar Al Sheghri, Julien Dompierre, Catherine Desrosiers, Nicolas Piché, Vladimir Brailovski, François Guibault

Publisher page

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is a standard for high-precision metrology in industrial non-destructive testing (NDT), enabling sub-voxel reconstruction of internal geometries in complex aerospace and biomedical components. However, attaining such accuracy typically requires thousands of X-ray projections and long acquisition and reconstruction times, particularly for high-attenuation materials such as nickel alloys. This work presents a computationally efficient alternative to volumetric CT reconstruction based on projection-space 3D–2D elastic registration of a prior CAD model to sparse CT projections. The voxel-wise reconstruction and segmentation steps are replaced by a hierarchical surface deformation model that morphs a CAD mesh using multi-scale radial basis functions (RBFs) followed by constrained vertex-level refinement (texture fitting). A differentiable X-ray renderer based on soft rasterization simulates forward projections and provides analytical gradients of mutual-information and edge-based objectives for gradient-based optimization with stochastic batching and sub-image sampling. A geometry-driven view-optimization heuristic further improves sparse-view performance using only the rigidly registered CAD input. Across representative industrial datasets, measurement accuracy is equivalent to CT reconstruction and segmentation using filtered-back projection using between 12-20 projections. Wall thickness measurements relative to micro CT segmentation (filtered back projection) deviate by less than 1 voxel for simple parts, though both methods measure thickness within one voxel compared to coordinate-measuring-machine (CMM) measurements. For complex industrial components such as a turbine blade, mean wall thickness deviation is 1̃ voxel vs conventional microCT segmentation. The proposed framework reduces image acquisition time to as little as 22 s with total processing time being less than five minutes (a hundred-fold improvement relative to conventional microCT for the same accuracy), establishing a realistic pathway toward high-throughput CT-metrology without necessitating full CT reconstruction.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization · Optical measurement and interference techniques · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Computed tomography for dimensional metrology10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.006 ↗
2. Sub-pixel high precision dimensional measurement method for aero-engine hollow turbine blade based on industrial computed tomography image10.1007/s41230-022-2044-8 ↗
3. Momeni · 2024
4. Plug-and-play priors for model based reconstruction
5. Learned primal–dual reconstruction10.1109/TMI.2018.2799231 ↗
6. Diamond · 2018
7. Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization10.1088/0031-9155/53/17/021 ↗
8. Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.01.003 ↗
9. Automated parameter selection for total variation minimization in image restoration10.1007/s10851-016-0676-2 ↗
10. Feature shape inspection of metal parts by matching X-ray projection images with cad model projections10.1016/j.precisioneng.2023.01.003 ↗
11. Bussy V, Vienne C, Escoda J, Kaftandjian V. Sparse-view X-ray CT reconstruction using cad model registration. In: Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation. 2022, paper ID: QNDE2022-98042 (ASME QNDE 2022).10.1115/QNDE2022-98042 ↗
12. Compensating streak artifacts in sparse-view inline industrial CT for accurate metrology using self-supervised optimization of implicit neural volume representations10.1007/s10921-025-01310-w ↗
13. Dynamic angle selection for few-view X-ray inspection of cad based objects
14. Dynamic few-view X-ray imaging for inspection of cad-based objects10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115012 ↗
15. Practical multi-mesh registration for few-view poly-chromatic X-ray inspection10.1007/s10921-024-01071-y ↗
16. The impact of machine learning on 2d/3d registration for image-guided interventions: A systematic review and perspective10.3389/frobt.2021.716007 ↗
17. Gopalakrishnan V, Dey D, Golland P, et al. Intraoperative 2d/3d image registration via differentiable X-ray rendering. In: Proc. IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2024.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01108 ↗
18. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images10.1109/42.796284 ↗
19. Point-set registration: Coherent point drift10.1109/TPAMI.2010.46 ↗
20. Locally injective mappings10.1111/cgf.12179 ↗
21. Scalable locally injective mappings10.1145/2983621 ↗
22. Guaranteed globally injective 3d deformation processing10.1145/3450626.3459757 ↗
23. Shape measurements of lattice materials from few X-ray radiographs using the 3d virtual image correlation (3d-VIC) method10.1007/s11340-024-01116-3 ↗
24. Kato · 2020
25. Soft rasterizer: A differentiable renderer for image-based 3d reasoning
26. Markov-chain monte carlo sampling of visibility boundaries for differentiable rendering
27. Slang. d: Fast, modular and differentiable shader programming10.1145/3618353 ↗
28. Deep learning compatible differentiable X-ray projections for inverse rendering
29. Generalizing spatial transformers to projective geometry with applications to 2d//3d registration
30. A fully differentiable framework for 2d/3d registration and the projective spatial transformers10.1109/TMI.2023.3299588 ↗
31. Striewski · 2022
32. Cad-astra: a versatile and efficient mesh projector for X-ray tomography with the astra-toolbox10.1364/OE.498194 ↗
33. Butzer JS, Riedel T, Woelk C, Proettel U, Doering A, Kurth P, Rueckert F, Rueckert D. Comparison of CT-imaging methods for defect detection in a multi-material 7-pin power connector. In: 10th International symposium on digital industrial radiology and computed tomography. 2025.
34. Ravi · 2020
35. Liu · 2019
36. Accurate reconstruction of gas turbine blade geometry using 3d/2d rigid-registration CT view optimization
37. Singh · 2026
38. Valtchanov · 2026
39. Elastic registration for non-destructive testing of additively manufactured TPMS lattice structures10.1007/s10921-026-01342-w ↗
40. Effect of iterative sparse-view ct reconstruction with task-specific projection angles on dimensional measurements