CADER: CAD-constrained elastic registration for voxel-accurate sparse-view 3D surface reconstruction in minutes
Source abstract
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) is a standard for high-precision metrology in industrial non-destructive testing (NDT), enabling sub-voxel reconstruction of internal geometries in complex aerospace and biomedical components. However, attaining such accuracy typically requires thousands of X-ray projections and long acquisition and reconstruction times, particularly for high-attenuation materials such as nickel alloys. This work presents a computationally efficient alternative to volumetric CT reconstruction based on projection-space 3D–2D elastic registration of a prior CAD model to sparse CT projections. The voxel-wise reconstruction and segmentation steps are replaced by a hierarchical surface deformation model that morphs a CAD mesh using multi-scale radial basis functions (RBFs) followed by constrained vertex-level refinement (texture fitting). A differentiable X-ray renderer based on soft rasterization simulates forward projections and provides analytical gradients of mutual-information and edge-based objectives for gradient-based optimization with stochastic batching and sub-image sampling. A geometry-driven view-optimization heuristic further improves sparse-view performance using only the rigidly registered CAD input. Across representative industrial datasets, measurement accuracy is equivalent to CT reconstruction and segmentation using filtered-back projection using between 12-20 projections. Wall thickness measurements relative to micro CT segmentation (filtered back projection) deviate by less than 1 voxel for simple parts, though both methods measure thickness within one voxel compared to coordinate-measuring-machine (CMM) measurements. For complex industrial components such as a turbine blade, mean wall thickness deviation is 1̃ voxel vs conventional microCT segmentation. The proposed framework reduces image acquisition time to as little as 22 s with total processing time being less than five minutes (a hundred-fold improvement relative to conventional microCT for the same accuracy), establishing a realistic pathway toward high-throughput CT-metrology without necessitating full CT reconstruction.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization · Optical measurement and interference techniques · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Computed tomography for dimensional metrology10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.006 ↗
2. Sub-pixel high precision dimensional measurement method for aero-engine hollow turbine blade based on industrial computed tomography image10.1007/s41230-022-2044-8 ↗
3. Momeni · 2024
4. Plug-and-play priors for model based reconstruction
5. Learned primal–dual reconstruction10.1109/TMI.2018.2799231 ↗
6. Diamond · 2018
7. Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization10.1088/0031-9155/53/17/021 ↗
8. Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.01.003 ↗
9. Automated parameter selection for total variation minimization in image restoration10.1007/s10851-016-0676-2 ↗
10. Feature shape inspection of metal parts by matching X-ray projection images with cad model projections10.1016/j.precisioneng.2023.01.003 ↗
11. Bussy V, Vienne C, Escoda J, Kaftandjian V. Sparse-view X-ray CT reconstruction using cad model registration. In: Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation. 2022, paper ID: QNDE2022-98042 (ASME QNDE 2022).10.1115/QNDE2022-98042 ↗
12. Compensating streak artifacts in sparse-view inline industrial CT for accurate metrology using self-supervised optimization of implicit neural volume representations10.1007/s10921-025-01310-w ↗
13. Dynamic angle selection for few-view X-ray inspection of cad based objects
14. Dynamic few-view X-ray imaging for inspection of cad-based objects10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115012 ↗
15. Practical multi-mesh registration for few-view poly-chromatic X-ray inspection10.1007/s10921-024-01071-y ↗
16. The impact of machine learning on 2d/3d registration for image-guided interventions: A systematic review and perspective10.3389/frobt.2021.716007 ↗
17. Gopalakrishnan V, Dey D, Golland P, et al. Intraoperative 2d/3d image registration via differentiable X-ray rendering. In: Proc. IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2024.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01108 ↗
18. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images10.1109/42.796284 ↗
19. Point-set registration: Coherent point drift10.1109/TPAMI.2010.46 ↗
20. Locally injective mappings10.1111/cgf.12179 ↗
21. Scalable locally injective mappings10.1145/2983621 ↗
22. Guaranteed globally injective 3d deformation processing10.1145/3450626.3459757 ↗
23. Shape measurements of lattice materials from few X-ray radiographs using the 3d virtual image correlation (3d-VIC) method10.1007/s11340-024-01116-3 ↗
24. Kato · 2020
25. Soft rasterizer: A differentiable renderer for image-based 3d reasoning
26. Markov-chain monte carlo sampling of visibility boundaries for differentiable rendering
27. Slang. d: Fast, modular and differentiable shader programming10.1145/3618353 ↗
28. Deep learning compatible differentiable X-ray projections for inverse rendering
29. Generalizing spatial transformers to projective geometry with applications to 2d//3d registration
30. A fully differentiable framework for 2d/3d registration and the projective spatial transformers10.1109/TMI.2023.3299588 ↗
31. Striewski · 2022
32. Cad-astra: a versatile and efficient mesh projector for X-ray tomography with the astra-toolbox10.1364/OE.498194 ↗
33. Butzer JS, Riedel T, Woelk C, Proettel U, Doering A, Kurth P, Rueckert F, Rueckert D. Comparison of CT-imaging methods for defect detection in a multi-material 7-pin power connector. In: 10th International symposium on digital industrial radiology and computed tomography. 2025.
34. Ravi · 2020
35. Liu · 2019
36. Accurate reconstruction of gas turbine blade geometry using 3d/2d rigid-registration CT view optimization
37. Singh · 2026
38. Valtchanov · 2026
39. Elastic registration for non-destructive testing of additively manufactured TPMS lattice structures10.1007/s10921-026-01342-w ↗
40. Effect of iterative sparse-view ct reconstruction with task-specific projection angles on dimensional measurements