journal article·2023-09-08Open access

Nanomechanical Modeling of the Bending Response of Silicon Nanowires

Sina Zare Pakzad, Mohammad Nasr Esfahani, Zuhal Tasdemir, Nicole Wollschläger, Taotao Li, XueFei Li, Mustafa Yilmaz, Yusuf Leblebici, B. Erdem Alaca

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 6· Issue 17

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Understanding the mechanical behavior of silicon nanowires is essential for the implementation of advanced nanoscale devices. Although bending tests are predominantly used for this purpose, their findings should be properly interpreted through modeling. Various modeling approaches tend to ignore parts of the effective parameter set involved in the rather complex bending response. This oversimplification is the main reason behind the spread of the modulus of elasticity and strength data in the literature. Addressing this challenge, a surface-based nanomechanical model is introduced in this study. The proposed model considers two important factors that have so far remained neglected despite their significance: (i) intrinsic stresses composed of the initial residual stress and surface-induced residual stress and (ii) anisotropic implementation of surface stress and elasticity. The modeling study is consolidated with molecular dynamics-based study of the native oxide surface through reactive force fields and a series of nanoscale characterization work through in situ three-point bending test and Raman spectroscopy. The treatment of the test data through a series of models with increasing complexity demonstrates a spread of 85 GPa for the modulus of elasticity and points to the origins of ambiguity regarding silicon nanowire properties, which are some of the most commonly employed nanoscale building blocks. A similar conclusion is reached for strength with variations of up to 3 GPa estimated by the aforementioned nanomechanical models. Precise consideration of the nanowire surface state is thus critical to comprehending the mechanical behavior of silicon nanowires accurately. Overall, this study highlights the need for a multiscale theoretical framework to fully understand the size-dependent mechanical behavior of silicon nanowires, with fortifying effects on the design and reliability assessment of future nanoelectromechanical systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey

School of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, U.K.

Laboratory of Micro and Nanotechnology, Paul Scherrer Institute, Forschungsstrasse 111, Villigen PSI, CH-5232, Switzerland

Department 5.1: Materialography, fractography and aging of technical materials, Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Unter den Eichen 87, Berlin 12205, Germany

School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Jiangsu 210093, China

Microelectronic Systems Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology − Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland

Rectorate, Sabanci University, Tuzla, Istanbul 34956, Turkey

, n2STAR-Koç University Nanofabrication and Nanocharacterization Center for Scientific and Technological Advanced Research, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey

Koç University Surface Technologies Research Center (KUYTAM), Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adem.20190019210.1002/adem.201900192 ↗
2. 10.3390/nano1207104310.3390/nano12071043 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20190360910.1002/adfm.201903609 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41467-018-05783-410.1038/s41467-018-05783-4 ↗
5. Alaca, B. E.; Karimzadehkhouei, M. Piezoresistive nanowire-based electromechanical sensors. Elsevier, 2023.10.1016/B978-0-12-822548-6.00075-3 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.snb.2010.02.02110.1016/j.snb.2010.02.021 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0133910.1021/acsnano.8b01339 ↗
8. 10.1002/aelm.20190124410.1002/aelm.201901244 ↗
9. 10.1109/TED.2020.304568910.1109/TED.2020.3045689 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10499110.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104991 ↗
11. Cakirlar, C.; Galderisi, G.; Beyer, C.; Simon, M.; Mikolajick, T.; Trommer, J. Challenges in Electron Beam Lithography of Silicon Nanostructures. 2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Nanotechnology (NANO), 2022; pp 207–210.10.1109/NANO54668.2022.9928629 ↗
12. 10.1088/1361-6439/ac855910.1088/1361-6439/ac8559 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.491954010.1063/1.4919540 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-021-26353-110.1038/s41467-021-26353-1 ↗
15. 10.1109/JMEMS.2002.80520810.1109/JMEMS.2002.805208 ↗
16. 10.1021/nl025875l10.1021/nl025875l ↗
17. 10.1002/9781118482568.ch810.1002/9781118482568.ch8 ↗
18. 10.1002/advs.20160033210.1002/advs.201600332 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10500210.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.105002 ↗
20. Pakzad, S. Z.; Esfahani, M. N.; Alaca, B. E. Molecular Dynamics Study of Orientation-dependent Tensile Properties of Si Nanowires with Native Oxide: Surface Stress and Surface Energy Effects. 2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Nanotechnology (NANO), 2021; pp 370–373.10.1109/NANO51122.2021.9514301 ↗
21. 10.1557/s43580-021-00117-x10.1557/s43580-021-00117-x ↗
22. 10.1109/TNANO.2018.286871210.1109/TNANO.2018.2868712 ↗
23. 10.1021/nl060028u10.1021/nl060028u ↗
24. 10.1016/j.eml.2018.06.00910.1016/j.eml.2018.06.009 ↗
25. 10.1155/2016/490583810.1155/2016/4905838 ↗
26. 10.3390/s1906141010.3390/s19061410 ↗
27. 10.1021/nl061939710.1021/nl0619397 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.480086510.1063/1.4800865 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.370367310.1063/1.3703673 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.491901710.1063/1.4919017 ↗
31. 10.1021/nl504793910.1021/nl5047939 ↗
32. 10.1021/nl073323310.1021/nl0733233 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.03.02110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.03.021 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsanm.2c0298310.1021/acsanm.2c02983 ↗
35. Zare Pakzad, S.; Nasr Esfahani, M.; Alaca, B. E. Mechanical Properties of Silicon Nanowires with Native Oxide Surface State. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03650, 2023.
36. 10.1021/nl801724b10.1021/nl801724b ↗
37. 10.1021/nl202630n10.1021/nl202630n ↗
38. 10.1143/JJAP.46.327710.1143/JJAP.46.3277 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.03.03410.1016/j.tsf.2004.03.034 ↗
40. 10.1007/BF0026137510.1007/BF00261375 ↗
41. 10.1098/rspa.1997.004710.1098/rspa.1997.0047 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.06.00710.1016/j.jmps.2011.06.007 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.physe.2011.11.01610.1016/j.physe.2011.11.016 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.235609410.1063/1.2356094 ↗
45. 10.1007/s00707-021-03112-310.1007/s00707-021-03112-3 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.physleta.2009.08.06510.1016/j.physleta.2009.08.065 ↗
47. 10.1107/S160057671901550410.1107/S1600576719015504 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.274695010.1063/1.2746950 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.02.01810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.02.018 ↗
50. 10.1007/s10483-022-2814-610.1007/s10483-022-2814-6 ↗
51. 10.1007/s12647-020-00409-x10.1007/s12647-020-00409-x ↗
52. 10.1021/nn304094b10.1021/nn304094b ↗
53. 10.1088/0026-1394/53/6/133910.1088/0026-1394/53/6/1339 ↗
54. 10.1088/0957-4484/11/3/30110.1088/0957-4484/11/3/301 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jmps.2004.03.00910.1016/j.jmps.2004.03.009 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.04130510.1103/PhysRevB.75.041305 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.13100110.1016/j.matlet.2021.131001 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.370367110.1063/1.3703671 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.physe.2016.01.00510.1016/j.physe.2016.01.005 ↗
60. 10.1021/nl071986e10.1021/nl071986e ↗
61. 10.1007/978-90-481-2516-6_510.1007/978-90-481-2516-6_5 ↗
62. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa7c3110.1088/1361-6528/aa7c31 ↗
63. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
64. 10.1021/jp027630310.1021/jp0276303 ↗
65. 10.1039/C2NR32387G10.1039/C2NR32387G ↗
66. 10.1021/jp400433u10.1021/jp400433u ↗
67. 10.1021/jp306391p10.1021/jp306391p ↗
68. 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.02.00810.1016/j.tsf.2017.02.008 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.10314010.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103140 ↗
70. 10.1063/1.293957610.1063/1.2939576 ↗
71. 10.1088/0026-1394/52/2/21410.1088/0026-1394/52/2/214 ↗
72. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa9a6910.1088/1361-6528/aa9a69 ↗
73. 10.1088/0026-1394/50/3/24310.1088/0026-1394/50/3/243 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.susc.2007.10.01410.1016/j.susc.2007.10.014 ↗
75. 10.1016/0039-6028(89)90748-610.1016/0039-6028(89)90748-6 ↗
76. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.194710.1103/PhysRevB.49.1947 ↗
77. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.197310.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1973 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.06.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2006.06.010 ↗
79. 10.1088/0965-0393/12/4/S0310.1088/0965-0393/12/4/S03 ↗
80. 10.1088/0957-4484/27/9/09530310.1088/0957-4484/27/9/095303 ↗
81. 10.1088/1361-6439/aaab2f10.1088/1361-6439/aaab2f ↗
82. 10.1063/5.001328410.1063/5.0013284 ↗
83. 10.1140/epjb/e2009-00276-210.1140/epjb/e2009-00276-2 ↗
84. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.138710.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1387 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.cpc.2016.04.00110.1016/j.cpc.2016.04.001 ↗
86. 10.1126/science.108031310.1126/science.1080313 ↗
87. 10.1023/A:101090090301910.1023/A:1010900903019 ↗
88. 10.1063/1.171394510.1063/1.1713945 ↗
89. 10.1063/1.34718110.1063/1.347181 ↗
90. 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.426310.1103/PhysRevB.43.4263 ↗
91. 10.1002/adma.20060270510.1002/adma.200602705 ↗
92. 10.1002/adma.20080048510.1002/adma.200800485 ↗
93. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0178910.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01789 ↗
94. 10.1021/nl204282y10.1021/nl204282y ↗
95. 10.1109/84.89676510.1109/84.896765 ↗
96. 10.1126/sciadv.150138210.1126/sciadv.1501382 ↗
97. 10.1063/1.314877410.1063/1.3148774 ↗
98. 10.1063/1.161836910.1063/1.1618369 ↗
99. 10.1021/nl902132w10.1021/nl902132w ↗
100. 10.3390/app806088010.3390/app8060880 ↗