journal article·2023-03-10Open access

Data-Driven Quantitative Intrinsic Hazard Criteria for Nanoproduct Development in a Safe-by-Design Paradigm: A Case Study of Silver Nanoforms

Irini Furxhi, Rossella Bengalli, Giulia Motta, Paride Mantecca, Ozge Kose, Marie Carriere, Ehtsham Ul Haq, Charlie O’Mahony, Magda Blosi, Davide Gardini, Anna Costa

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 6· Issue 5

Abstract

The current European (EU) policies, that is, the Green Deal, envisage safe and sustainable practices for chemicals, which include nanoforms (NFs), at the earliest stages of innovation. A theoretically safe and sustainable by design (SSbD) framework has been established from EU collaborative efforts toward the definition of quantitative criteria in each SSbD dimension, namely, the human and environmental safety dimension and the environmental, social, and economic sustainability dimensions. In this study, we target the safety dimension, and we demonstrate the journey toward quantitative intrinsic hazard criteria derived from findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable data. Data were curated and merged for the development of new approach methodologies, that is, quantitative structure-activity relationship models based on regression and classification machine learning algorithms, with the intent to predict a hazard class. The models utilize system (i.e., hydrodynamic size and polydispersity index) and non-system (i.e., elemental composition and core size)-dependent nanoscale features in combination with biological in vitro attributes and experimental conditions for various silver NFs, functional antimicrobial textiles, and cosmetics applications. In a second step, interpretable rules (criteria) followed by a certainty factor were obtained by exploiting a Bayesian network structure crafted by expert reasoning. The probabilistic model shows a predictive capability of ≈78% (average accuracy across all hazard classes). In this work, we show how we shifted from the conceptualization of the SSbD framework toward the realistic implementation with pragmatic instances. This study reveals (i) quantitative intrinsic hazard criteria to be considered in the safety aspects during synthesis stage, (ii) the challenges within, and (iii) the future directions for the generation and distillation of such criteria that can feed SSbD paradigms. Specifically, the criteria can guide material engineers to synthesize NFs that are inherently safer from alternative nanoformulations, at the earliest stages of innovation, while the models enable a fast and cost-efficient in silico toxicological screening of previously synthesized and hypothetical scenarios of yet-to-be synthesized NFs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Computational Drug Discovery Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Transgero Ltd, Limerick V42V384, Ireland

Department of Accounting and Finance, Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick, Limerick V94T9PX, Ireland

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 1, Milano 20126, Italy

Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, CNRS, Grenoble INP, IRIG, SYMMES, Grenoble 38000, France

Department of Physics, and Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick V94TC9PX, Ireland

Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologia dei Materiali Ceramici (CNR-ISTEC), Via Granarolo, 64, Faenza 48018, Ravenna, Italy

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

References (97)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.10509310.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105093 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.impact.2021.10029710.1016/j.impact.2021.100297 ↗
3. European Union · 2022
4. Commission, E, Directorate-General for, R · 2022
5. 10.1038/s41565-021-00911-610.1038/s41565-021-00911-6 ↗
6. 10.3390/nano1010203310.3390/nano10102033 ↗
7. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.80509610.3389/fbioe.2021.805096 ↗
8. 10.3390/nano1106152010.3390/nano11061520 ↗
9. 10.3390/nano1107181810.3390/nano11071818 ↗
10. 10.3390/coatings1112148610.3390/coatings11121486 ↗
11. 10.1002/smll.20220023110.1002/smll.202200231 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.10521610.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105216 ↗
13. 10.3389/ftox.2022.96455310.3389/ftox.2022.964553 ↗
14. 10.1002/smll.20090017910.1002/smll.200900179 ↗
15. 10.1038/nnano.2011.1010.1038/nnano.2011.10 ↗
16. 10.3390/nano1001011610.3390/nano10010116 ↗
17. 10.1039/c8en00085a10.1039/c8en00085a ↗
18. 10.3109/17435390.2014.95269810.3109/17435390.2014.952698 ↗
19. 10.1214/21-ss13310.1214/21-ss133 ↗
20. 10.3390/nano1206099310.3390/nano12060993 ↗
21. 10.1038/nnano.2007.25710.1038/nnano.2007.257 ↗
22. Thirumuruganathan, S.; Huber, M. Building Bayesian Network based expert systems from rules. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 9–12 Oct 2011, 2011; pp 3002–3008.10.1109/ICSMC.2011.6084157 ↗
23. 10.1080/17435390.2016.127848110.1080/17435390.2016.1278481 ↗
24. 10.1186/s11671-016-1724-y10.1186/s11671-016-1724-y ↗
25. 10.3390/ijms1903064910.3390/ijms19030649 ↗
26. Furxhi I. · 2019
27. 10.1080/17435390.2020.172943910.1080/17435390.2020.1729439 ↗
28. 10.1214/15-AOAS84810.1214/15-AOAS848 ↗
29. Wang T. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2017 · 18 · 1
30. 10.1002/smll.20190051010.1002/smll.201900510 ↗
31. Costa A. L. · 2016 · 17110.1007/978-3-319-32392-3_10 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.impact.2018.06.00310.1016/j.impact.2018.06.003 ↗
33. 10.1098/rsos.17111310.1098/rsos.171113 ↗
34. 10.1039/d2en00178k10.1039/d2en00178k ↗
35. 10.1186/s13321-022-00614-710.1186/s13321-022-00614-7 ↗
36. 10.1039/c3nj00894k10.1039/c3nj00894k ↗
37. 10.1007/s11051-010-0010-710.1007/s11051-010-0010-7 ↗
38. 10.1039/c5nr07918g10.1039/c5nr07918g ↗
39. ECHA · 2022
40. 10.1038/s41565-022-01173-610.1038/s41565-022-01173-6 ↗
41. Andrade J. D. · 1985 · 10510.1007/978-1-4684-8610-0_5 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.fct.2017.08.03010.1016/j.fct.2017.08.030 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.10.01210.1016/j.tiv.2016.10.012 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.10.01910.1016/j.yrtph.2017.10.019 ↗
46. 10.1098/rsif.2018.036410.1098/rsif.2018.0364 ↗
47. 10.1021/nn101557e10.1021/nn101557e ↗
48. 10.1080/17435390.2017.136657410.1080/17435390.2017.1366574 ↗
49. 10.1186/s12951-014-0062-410.1186/s12951-014-0062-4 ↗
50. 10.1177/108201321989420210.1177/1082013219894202 ↗
51. 10.3109/17435390.2013.81528410.3109/17435390.2013.815284 ↗
52. 10.1186/s12989-022-00491-w10.1186/s12989-022-00491-w ↗
53. 10.1039/c6en00278a10.1039/c6en00278a ↗
54. 10.1002/smll.20190768710.1002/smll.201907687 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0297810.1021/acsnano.8b02978 ↗
56. 10.3390/nano1011213210.3390/nano10112132 ↗
57. 10.3390/ijms2105161810.3390/ijms21051618 ↗
58. 10.1080/1040844090312097510.1080/10408440903120975 ↗
59. 10.1002/wnan.5410.1002/wnan.54 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.tiv.2004.03.01210.1016/j.tiv.2004.03.012 ↗
61. 10.3389/ftox.2022.98170110.3389/ftox.2022.981701 ↗
62. 10.4236/ijis.2013.31a00610.4236/ijis.2013.31a006 ↗
63. 10.1109/access.2020.299403310.1109/access.2020.2994033 ↗
64. Cassel, M.; Lima, F. Evaluating one-hot encoding finite state machines for SEU reliability in SRAM-based FPGAs, 12th IEEE International On-Line Testing Symposium (IOLTS’06), 10–12 July 2006, 2006; p 6.
65. 10.1613/jair.95310.1613/jair.953 ↗
66. McInnes, L.; Healy, J.; Melville, J. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction. 2018, arXiv:1802.03426.10.21105/joss.00861 ↗
67. 10.1038/s41586-019-0969-x10.1038/s41586-019-0969-x ↗
68. Singh, G. K. C.; Mémoli, F.; Carlsson, G. E. Topological Methods for the Analysis of High Dimensional Data Sets and 3D Object Recognition; PBG@Eurographics, 2007.
69. He, Y.; Tan, H.; Luo, W.; Mao, H.; Ma, D.; Feng, S.; Fan, J. MR-DBSCAN: An Efficient Parallel Density-Based Clustering Algorithm Using MapReduce. 2011 IEEE 17th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 7–9 Dec 2011, 2011; pp 473–480.10.1109/ICPADS.2011.83 ↗
70. 10.2478/v10117-011-0021-110.2478/v10117-011-0021-1 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.00110.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001 ↗
72. 10.1088/1742-6596/1828/1/01201510.1088/1742-6596/1828/1/012015 ↗
73. 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b0007610.1021/acs.estlett.6b00076 ↗
74. 10.1111/risa.1282710.1111/risa.12827 ↗
75. 10.1089/10665270075005096110.1089/106652700750050961 ↗
76. Schreiber J. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2018 · 18 · 1
77. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq00510.1093/bioinformatics/btq005 ↗
78. Yuan C. · J. Artif. Intell. Res. · 2011 · 42 · 309
80. 10.1016/j.fct.2017.09.03710.1016/j.fct.2017.09.037 ↗
81. Grandini, M.; Bagli, E.; Visani, G. J. A. Metrics for Multi-Class Classification: an Overview. 2020, arXiv:2008.05756.
82. Carey, A.; Wu, X. The Fairness Field Guide: Perspectives from Social and Formal Sciences. 2022, arXiv:2201.0521610.3389/fdata.2022.892837 ↗
83. George D. · 2003
84. 10.1080/17435390.2019.159520610.1080/17435390.2019.1595206 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.impact.2021.10037810.1016/j.impact.2021.100378 ↗
86. 10.7717/peerj-cs.61910.7717/peerj-cs.619 ↗
87. 10.1007/s10115-019-01427-110.1007/s10115-019-01427-1 ↗
88. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-30910.1186/1471-2105-12-309 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.10658410.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106584 ↗
90. 10.3390/nano1107177410.3390/nano11071774 ↗
91. 10.3390/coatings1112153210.3390/coatings11121532 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.05.01610.1016/j.toxlet.2019.05.016 ↗
93. 10.1007/s10994-006-6226-110.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
94. 10.3390/nano1208134610.3390/nano12081346 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.06.11210.1016/j.neucom.2022.06.112 ↗
96. 10.1080/17435390.2016.127848110.1080/17435390.2016.1278481 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.05.01610.1016/j.toxlet.2019.05.016 ↗