In Situ Growth of Nanoporous Covalent Organic Frameworks on Metal–Organic Framework Surfaces for Epoxy Coating Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
The Cu-MOF’s susceptibility to easy hydrolysis impairs its utility. A one-pot method was used to encapsulate nanoporous hydrophobic Im-COF on the surface of Cu-MOF. The hybrid Cu-MOF@Im-COF exhibited a water contact angle (WCA) of 100.9°. Cu-MOF/G@Im-COF was obtained by a grooming process (G) with 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctanetriethoxysilane and integrated with epoxy resin (E51) in two ways. The Cu 2+ release rate from the coatings, as determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy tests, was reduced to 0.01037 μg·cm –2 ·d –1 . In antimicrobial experiments with E. coli, the killing time was extended for 12 h. The Bode value increased to 1.4 × 10 10 Ω when immersed in a 3.5% NaCl solution for comparison. The self-cleaning and anti-icing test performance of the coatings was significantly improved with increasing WCA. Cu-MOF/G@Im-COF will have an even greater impact in more areas than just antimicrobial and corrosion resistance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
Offshore Oil Production Plant of Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Company, Dongying 257237, China
Funding
Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Koch, G.; Varney, J.; Thompson, N.; Moghissi, O.; Gould, M.; Payer, J. International Measures of Prevention, Application, and Economics of Corrosion Technologies Study; NACE International: Houston, TX, March 2016.
2. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.10088910.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100889 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.08.14610.1016/j.electacta.2016.08.146 ↗
4. 10.1002/maco.20050386110.1002/maco.200503861 ↗
5. Lewis J. · Mater. Forum · 1998 · 22 · 41
6. Duan J.-z. · Marine Science · 2020 · 44 · 162
7. 10.1039/D1PY00512J10.1039/D1PY00512J ↗
8. 10.3390/md1807037110.3390/md18070371 ↗
9. 10.1002/mame.20220000410.1002/mame.202200004 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.04310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.043 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.0c0674310.1021/acsami.0c06743 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.07.02310.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.07.023 ↗
13. 10.3390/polym1304056110.3390/polym13040561 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jscs.2023.10176210.1016/j.jscs.2023.101762 ↗
15. 10.1021/jacs.6b0123310.1021/jacs.6b01233 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.trac.2019.06.00710.1016/j.trac.2019.06.007 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.03.03410.1016/j.micromeso.2004.03.034 ↗
18. 10.1016/B978-0-12-822099-3.00012-510.1016/B978-0-12-822099-3.00012-5 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.05910.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.059 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.10704910.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.107049 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13364010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133640 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2023.10777710.1016/j.porgcoat.2023.107777 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14186910.1016/j.cej.2023.141869 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jiec.2023.07.05210.1016/j.jiec.2023.07.052 ↗
25. 10.1126/science.112041110.1126/science.1120411 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b0036910.1021/acs.accounts.5b00369 ↗
27. 10.1002/marc.20230020310.1002/marc.202300203 ↗
28. 10.1002/advs.20180236510.1002/advs.201802365 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.21373510.1016/j.ccr.2020.213735 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.trac.2022.11674110.1016/j.trac.2022.116741 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11771-023-5471-910.1007/s11771-023-5471-9 ↗
32. 10.1039/C8NJ06249H10.1039/C8NJ06249H ↗
33. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0562410.1021/acsnano.2c05624 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.est.2023.10761710.1016/j.est.2023.107617 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.03.00410.1016/j.micromeso.2014.03.004 ↗
36. 10.1007/s00604-019-3330-z10.1007/s00604-019-3330-z ↗
37. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.07.02510.1016/j.materresbull.2018.07.025 ↗
38. Dikio E. D. · Chemical Science Transactions · 2013 · 2 · 1386
39. 10.1002/aic.1136210.1002/aic.11362 ↗
40. 10.1021/jacs.7b0152310.1021/jacs.7b01523 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.18610.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.186 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.13427710.1016/j.molstruc.2022.134277 ↗
43. 10.3390/polym1417353610.3390/polym14173536 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.03710.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.037 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.06110.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.061 ↗
46. 10.1021/ja973960310.1021/ja9739603 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.11654210.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116542 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.02010.1016/j.cej.2015.07.020 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.21449610.1016/j.ccr.2022.214496 ↗
50. 10.1128/AEM.02268-0910.1128/AEM.02268-09 ↗
51. 10.1039/C9DT00791A10.1039/C9DT00791A ↗
52. 10.1021/la702567w10.1021/la702567w ↗
53. 10.1039/tf944400054610.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.15690710.1016/j.apsusc.2023.156907 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13655710.1016/j.cej.2022.136557 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12734310.1016/j.cej.2020.127343 ↗
57. 10.1002/chem.20210322010.1002/chem.202103220 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.colcom.2021.10058010.1016/j.colcom.2021.100580 ↗
59. 10.1002/app.1969.07013081510.1002/app.1969.070130815 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.04.06510.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.04.065 ↗
61. 10.1038/s41586-019-1827-610.1038/s41586-019-1827-6 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10909410.1016/j.corsci.2020.109094 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.10712110.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.107121 ↗
64. 10.1021/acsami.8b1110810.1021/acsami.8b11108 ↗