journal article·2018-11-26

Finding the Optimal Balance between the Pore Size and Pore Chemistry in Hybrid Ultramicroporous Materials for Trace Acetylene Capture

Daniel O’Nolan, Amrit Kumar, Kai-Jie Chen, Soumya Mukherjee, David G. Madden, Michael J. Zaworotko

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 1· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

The development of porous coordination networks based on square grids pillared by inorganic anions has attracted attention thanks to their benchmark gas sorption properties (e.g., high uptake capacity at low partial pressures; high selectivity). These properties are imparted by combining ultramicropores with strong electrostatics. Such hybrid ultramicroporous materials (HUMs) are also modular in nature and therefore amenable to systematic design via crystal engineering. Herein, we report the trace acetylene-capture-from-ethylene performance of two new interpenetrated HUMs with primitive cubic (pcu) topology, TIFSIX-14-Cu-i and NbOFFIVE-2-Cu-i. The sorption performances of these two materials were compared with those of three existing isostructural HUMs including the current benchmark, SIFSIX-14-Cu-i. Our results reveal that, whereas all five materials exhibit an excellent separation performance, small increases in the pore size from larger anions such as TIFSIX and NbOFFIVE more than counteracts their stronger electrostatics. SIFSIX-14-Cu-i, therefore, remains the benchmark material despite its weaker electrostatics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Sciences and Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.19952127110.1002/anie.199521271 ↗
2. 10.1002/anie.20046071210.1002/anie.200460712 ↗
3. Desiraju G. R. · 1989
4. 10.1021/cr990043210.1021/cr9900432 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature1189310.1038/nature11893 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.chempr.2016.10.00910.1016/j.chempr.2016.10.009 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20170421010.1002/adma.201704210 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0095010.1021/acs.iecr.8b00950 ↗
9. 10.1021/ja309452y10.1021/ja309452y ↗
10. 10.1039/C5CC06577A10.1039/C5CC06577A ↗
11. 10.1021/ja211340t10.1021/ja211340t ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.20160228710.1002/anie.201602287 ↗
13. 10.1039/C6SC05012C10.1039/C6SC05012C ↗
14. 10.1039/c3cc37695h10.1039/c3cc37695h ↗
15. 10.1039/C7CC02289A10.1039/C7CC02289A ↗
16. 10.1039/C5CC04487A10.1039/C5CC04487A ↗
17. 10.1021/ic048766d10.1021/ic048766d ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.6b0534510.1021/jacs.6b05345 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20170876910.1002/anie.201708769 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.aaf245810.1126/science.aaf2458 ↗
21. 10.1039/C7CC05882A10.1039/C7CC05882A ↗
22. 10.1021/ja502119z10.1021/ja502119z ↗
23. 10.1039/C4CC09774B10.1039/C4CC09774B ↗
24. 10.1021/jacs.7b0168210.1021/jacs.7b01682 ↗
25. 10.1021/cg050331t10.1021/cg050331t ↗
26. 10.1107/S205252061600395410.1107/S2052520616003954 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b0045310.1021/acs.cgd.6b00453 ↗
28. 10.1002/aic.69011012510.1002/aic.690110125 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20180986910.1002/anie.201809869 ↗