journal article·2022-02-25Open access

Surface-Functionalized Cellulose Nanocrystals as Nanofillers for Crosslinking Processes: Implications for Thermosetting Resins

Roneisha Haney, Ravichandran H. Kollarigowda, Lutz Wiegart, Subramanian Ramakrishnan

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 5· Issue 2

Abstract

Understanding the response of fillers in the epoxy resin crosslinking process and characterizing polymer–filler dynamics are the key features that guide the engineering of new thermosetting resin composites. In this work, X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy (XPCS) is used as a thermal analysis tool to track the microscopic changes occurring during the cure of a functionalized cellulose nanocrystal (mCNC)–epoxy composite. In contrast, traditional methods such as differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and curing rheology are used to understand the kinetics and properties on macroscopic length scales. Of interest is the influence of the mCNC on the curing kinetics and properties of the thermosetting resin. Two levels of modification (increasing hydrophobicity) were chosen to observe the effect of functionalization. Before cure, the highly functionalized CNC (mCNC3) shows a 44% increase in complex viscosity (η*), while the less functionalized CNC (mCNC2) shows a η* value similar to that of the neat resin. As the cure cycle progresses, results from DSC, rheology, and XPCS further show the enhancement in dispersion for mCNC3. The results show a clear difference in the maximum drift velocity, maximum heat flow, and complex viscosity during the ramp to the isothermal cure temperature (Tcure). Such results suggest that mCNC3 contains a well-dispersed network of particles due to the higher level of functionalization. During Tcure, a transition in elastic modulus (G′) occurs only for the highly functionalized CNC particle system. We believe that heat-induced aggregation occurs, and the crosslinked resin ultimately dominates the macroscopic properties of the final cured system for all samples. The results from the three techniques are in good agreement and showcase XPCS as a beneficial experimental tool for characterizing the microscopic dynamics of particulate-filled thermosetting resins. Hence, we envision this to be a fundamental curing study for the design of thermosetting resin composites.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, FAMU-FSU Engineering, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, United States

National Synchrotron Light Source II, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, United States

Funding

Army Research Office · National Science Foundation

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.03.02610.1016/j.jiec.2015.03.026 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jiec.2011.11.14010.1016/j.jiec.2011.11.140 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0287610.1021/acs.iecr.0c02876 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0171110.1021/acs.iecr.0c01711 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0110210.1021/acsapm.9b01102 ↗
6. 10.1002/pen.2324210.1002/pen.23242 ↗
7. 10.3389/fchem.2020.0039210.3389/fchem.2020.00392 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.nantod.2021.10120210.1016/j.nantod.2021.101202 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0478910.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04789 ↗
10. 10.1039/C6CS00895J10.1039/C6CS00895J ↗
11. 10.1007/s40820-020-0408-410.1007/s40820-020-0408-4 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.13610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.136 ↗
13. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0523110.1021/acssuschemeng.9b05231 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0051110.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00511 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10570-018-1830-310.1007/s10570-018-1830-3 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.08.07610.1016/j.polymer.2018.08.076 ↗
17. Heinze T. · 2006 · 1
18. 10.1007/s10570-005-2203-210.1007/s10570-005-2203-2 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.6b0985210.1021/acsami.6b09852 ↗
20. 10.1021/cm051881h10.1021/cm051881h ↗
21. 10.1007/s10853-017-1831-x10.1007/s10853-017-1831-x ↗
23. Kothmann, M. H.; de Anda, A. R.; Köppel, A.; Zeiler, R.; Tauer, G.; Zhang, Z.; Altstädt, V. The Effect of Dispersion and Particle–Matrix Interactions on the Fatigue Behavior of Novel Epoxy/Halloysite Nanocomposites; Hanser, 2019; pp 121–155.10.3139/9781569906361.004 ↗
24. 10.1002/pen.76022180710.1002/pen.760221807 ↗
25. 10.1088/0965-0393/22/2/02501310.1088/0965-0393/22/2/025013 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10973-005-0794-310.1007/s10973-005-0794-3 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.01.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2013.01.021 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0040-6031(01)00672-410.1016/S0040-6031(01)00672-4 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10853-012-6781-810.1007/s10853-012-6781-8 ↗
30. 10.1155/2013/18346310.1155/2013/183463 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msec.2010.07.00810.1016/j.msec.2010.07.008 ↗
32. 10.1039/C7RA13233F10.1039/C7RA13233F ↗
33. 10.1063/1.514148810.1063/1.5141488 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.02140810.1103/PhysRevE.79.021408 ↗
35. 10.1039/C6SM01492E10.1039/C6SM01492E ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0076610.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00766 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.03.03210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.03.032 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.07310.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.073 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0440310.1021/acs.langmuir.7b04403 ↗
40. 10.1186/1754-6834-3-1010.1186/1754-6834-3-10 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0376510.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03765 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.07.03810.1016/j.polymer.2009.07.038 ↗
43. Highly Modified Cellulose Nanocrystals and Formation of Epoxy-Nanocrystalline Cellulose (CNC) Nanocomposites. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsami.6b09852 (accessed April 11, 2021).
44. Feigin L. · 198710.1007/978-1-4757-6624-0 ↗
45. 10.1088/0953-8984/15/27/30810.1088/0953-8984/15/27/308 ↗
46. 10.1021/la020982g10.1021/la020982g ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b1142510.1021/acs.jpcb.6b11425 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.cis.2016.05.00210.1016/j.cis.2016.05.002 ↗
49. 10.1039/C3SM51290H10.1039/C3SM51290H ↗
50. Lehmkühler F. · 2020 · 117
51. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2020.10022010.1016/j.mtphys.2020.100220 ↗
52. 10.1209/0295-5075/95/2800110.1209/0295-5075/95/28001 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.22830210.1103/PhysRevLett.93.228302 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.227510.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2275 ↗
55. 10.1039/C4SM01598C10.1039/C4SM01598C ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.04140110.1103/PhysRevE.75.041401 ↗
57. 10.1063/1.365338010.1063/1.3653380 ↗
58. 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.01140510.1103/PhysRevE.79.011405 ↗
59. 10.1039/B204495A10.1039/B204495A ↗
60. 10.1007/s10189017000510.1007/s101890170005 ↗
61. 10.1007/978-3-0348-5775-8_1410.1007/978-3-0348-5775-8_14 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.tca.2008.04.01210.1016/j.tca.2008.04.012 ↗
63. 10.1002/pen.1177810.1002/pen.11778 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10730010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107300 ↗
65. 10.1038/352608a010.1038/352608a0 ↗
66. Borsali R. · 200810.1007/978-1-4020-4465-6 ↗
67. 10.1088/1367-2630/12/5/05500110.1088/1367-2630/12/5/055001 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.physleta.2019.06.02910.1016/j.physleta.2019.06.029 ↗
69. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0071610.1021/acsapm.0c00716 ↗
70. 10.1107/S160057671700057710.1107/S1600576717000577 ↗